1,721,712 research outputs found
Samuelson (Paul A.) - Economics : An Introductory Analysis.
James Emile. Samuelson (Paul A.) - Economics : An Introductory Analysis.. In: Revue économique, volume 3, n°6, 1952. pp. 875-877
The Harvard-Circle
This brief note reflects on the times when Joseph A. Schumpeter was engaged at Harvard University in Boston/Mass, 1932-1950. A description of Schumpeter’s interaction with friends and collaborators as well as opponents, of the intellectual struggles he was engaged in as well as the ideological dimensions of his life and approaches sheds an interesting light on a scholar whose oeuvre received full admiration only some decades after he passed away in 1950
Samuelson (Paul A.) - Economics : An Introductory Analysis.
James Emile. Samuelson (Paul A.) - Economics : An Introductory Analysis.. In: Revue économique, volume 3, n°6, 1952. pp. 875-877
La falacia clásica clásica
Traducción del artículo de Samuelson, P. A. (1994). The classical classical fallacy. Journal of Economic Literature, (32)2, 620-639.Fil: Samuelson, Paul A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; United States
(書簡) Sender: Samuelson, Paul A. ; Receiver: Haberler, Gottfried
3枚FAX書簡オリジナルの所在: 一橋大学経済研究所資料室都留正子氏,和田昭允氏より寄贈2-I-1-1
Samuelson (Paul A.), Bishop (Robert L.), Coleman (John R.) ed. - Readings in economics.
Samuelson (Paul A.), Bishop (Robert L.), Coleman (John R.) ed. - Readings in economics.. In: Revue économique, volume 7, n°1, 1956. p. 168
(書簡)Date: 1970/3/?? ; Sender: Samuelson, Paul A. ; Receiver: Tsuru, S (Shigeto)
手書き数式メモ, 署名書簡オリジナルの所在: 一橋大学経済研究所資料室都留重人氏より寄贈1-B1-14-01/00
(書簡)Date: 1982/11/8 ; Sender: Samuelson, Paul A. ; Receiver: Tsuru, S (Shigeto)
手書き名前入りメモ用紙書簡オリジナルの所在: 一橋大学経済研究所資料室都留重人氏より寄贈1-B1-14-01/00
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
