1,720,968 research outputs found

    L'allevamento del cavallo anglo-arabo in Sardegna

    No full text
    Horse breeding in Sardinia has a long tradition and is very spread in all over the region. In the last years it is suffering a strong crises, even being characterized by a good level of management, and wide homogeneity of the main breed, the Anglo-Arabian, which represents nearly the total Italian production of this breed. This work aims to have an overview of the sector. 131 horse farms were visited to obtain information on their animals and management. In average in each farm there are 9.3 heads and 2.2 mares. Only 23% of the farm is held as main activity of the owner, in 30% of cases horse breeding is a collateral activity associated to a different main species (ovine, bovine, pig etc.), in the other cases it is held as a secondary activity. Only in 17% of cases the horses are prepared and took to the competitions, in the other cases they are only produced (56%) or even tamed (19%). The adult animals in reproduction are 25% of the total. The ratio foals/mares in the years 2005-2009 vary between 0,4 and 0,5 and in the last season the percentage of born foals Italian saddle overcame that of Anglo-Arabian. This tendency can lead in few years to the risk of reduction of the spread homogeneity reached after long time of selection and improvement of the Anglo-Arabia

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore