1,721,122 research outputs found
Optimizing the Instruction Cache Performance of Embedded Systems
No full textIn the embedded domain, the gap between memory and processor performance and the increase in application complexity need to be supported without wasting precious system resources: die size, power, etc. For these reasons, effective exploitation of small and simple cache memories is of the utmost importance. However, programs running on such caches can experience serious inefficiencies due to cache conflicts.We present a new Cache-Aware Code Allocation Technique (CAT), which transforms the structure of programs so that their behavior toward memory can meet the locality features the cache is able to exploit. The proposed approach uses detailed information of program execution to place program areas into memory and employs the new idea of “look-forward estimation” that helps to seek better global layouts during the placement of each area. CAT-optimized programs outperform the original ones achieving the same miss rate on two times, and sometimes four times, smaller caches. Moreover, CAT improves the instruction miss rate by more than 40% if compared to the best procedure-reordering algorithm. CAT performances derive from the increased number of cache lines that support the execution of optimized applications and from a more balanced load on them
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
