1,725,309 research outputs found
Supplemental Material - A comparison of the efficacy and safety between anticoagulation alone and combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of pulmonary embolism on outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Supplemental Material for A comparison of the efficacy and safety between anticoagulation alone and combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of pulmonary embolism on outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Bing Sun, Rui Rui Chen in Perfusion</p
Analyse and Talk about the Ma Rui-Chen" Mao-Shi-Chuan-Jian-Tong-Shi• Za-Kao-Ge-Shuo"
[[abstract]]馬瑞辰是清代中期漢學的代表學者之一,在《詩經》學史的評述中,其《毛詩傳箋通釋》與胡承洪《毛詩後箋》、陳吳《詩毛氏傳疏》齊名,屬於一流的傳世之作。在馬瑞辰看來,《毛詩正義》中的許多疏釋誤解了《毛傅》、《鄭箋》的釋義,其推出《毛詩傳箋通釋》的主要動機與目標就是打算超越《毛詩正義》的正瓦解成績,以修正孔氏對《毛傳》、《鄭箋》的誤釋與混淆。《毛詩傳箋通釋》首卷〈雜考各說〉共收考證是性的文章十九篇,多是馬氏考辨《詩經》外緣問題的基本意見,以之與考釋詩文的各卷內容合併參看,才能對馬氏的《詩經》學有完金色的概念。〈雜考各說〉中最值得注意的是〈詩入樂說〉、〈詩人義同字變例〉與〈毛詩古文多假借〉三篇,首篇精闢分析了《詩》與樂之間的密切關係,後兩者乃全書重要訓話觀念之介紹,馬氏也在此二文中透露了他解《詩》的方法論。本文以此三篇爲考察對象,籍以管窺馬氏考釋與論述之細膩,也要點出其說仍待商榷之處。[[abstract]]Ma Rui-Chen was one of the representative scholar in middle period Qing Dynasty .On "the Book of Songs" studying history, his "Mao-Shi- Chuan-Jian-Tong-Shi" with Hu Cheng-Gong "Mao-Shi-Hou-Jian" Chen Huan "Shi-Mao-Shi-Chuan-Shu" enjoy equal popularity, belong to first- c1ass doing handed down from ancient times. In the view of Ma, a lot of "Mao-Shi-Zheng-Yi" misunderstand "Mao-Chuan" and "ZhengJian". So Ma Rui-Chen wanted to write a study to fix those problems This is a great work that is very difficult. "Za-Kao-Ge-Shuo" charge 19 articles, those study was the basic viewpoint of Ma Rui-Chen .But we have to use that to read the whole book. The most important articles were "Shi-Ru-Le-Shuo" "Shi-Ren-Yi-Tong-Zi-Bian-Li", "Mao-Shi-Gu-Wen-Duo-Jia-Jie". The first study was talk about "the Book of Songs" and its music. another studies were the important view of Ma. These three articles shows Ma Rui-Chen outstanding work, but we have to say there was someplace wrong
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
sj-docx-1-sed-10.1177_00224669231151914 – Supplemental material for Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Instructional Experiences of Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disability
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-sed-10.1177_00224669231151914 for Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Instructional Experiences of Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disability by Jenny R. Root, Esther R. Lindström, Deidre Gilley and Rui Chen in The Journal of Special Education</p
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
sj-docx-1-eqs-10.1177_87552930231205878 – Supplemental material for Least cost path analysis as an objective and automatic method to define the main fault trace for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analyses
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-eqs-10.1177_87552930231205878 for Least cost path analysis as an objective and automatic method to define the main fault trace for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analyses by Kate Thomas, Christopher Milliner, Rui Chen, Brian Chiou, Timothy Dawson and Mark Petersen in Earthquake Spectra</p
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
