1,720,982 research outputs found
К вопросу о категории « возвышенного » у Вячеслава Иванова
Rolf FIEGUTH, The question of the category of the sublime in Viacheslav Ivanov s poetry.
We interpret as a theory of the sublime Ivanov's view on the poet's inspiration which is surmounting individualism, first by the lonely poet's mystic ecstasies, and then by the inspired poet's return to the community (sobornost') with other human beings. The same idea is underlying Ivanov's poetical cycles : the single poem's individualism is dominated by its intertextuality (stylisation of the antique, the Old Russian, etc.) and by its subordination to the compositional principle of ordered texts : the single word's individualism is partly sacrificed to the particularities of Ivanovian metrics and syntax (for instance Hesperides). Ivanov's ideal of a communitarian sublime (sobornoe vozvyshennoe) should be read in the context of a history of the sublime in Russian literature.Rolf FIEGUTH, La question de la catégorie du «sublime » chez Vjačeslav Ivanov.
Nous interprétons en tant que théorie du sublime la conception ivanovienne de l'inspiration du poète, inspiration qui surmonte l'individualisme d'abord par les extases mystiques du poète solitaire, et puis par le retour du poète inspiré à la communauté (sobornost') avec les autres êtres humains. La même idée caractérise les cycles lyriques d'Ivanov : l'individualisme du poème individuel est dominé parson intertextualité (stylisation antique, vieux-russe, etc.), et par sa subordination au principe de la composition cyclique ; celui du mot individuel est en partie sacrifié à une métrique et à une syntaxte particulièrement marquées (cf. le cycle Hes- pérides). L'idéal du sublime communautaire (sohornoe vozvyšennoe) d'Ivanov doit être lu dans le contexte d'une histoire du sublime dans la littérature russe.Fieguth Rolf. К вопросу о категории « возвышенного » у Вячеслава Иванова. In: Cahiers du monde russe : Russie, Empire russe, Union soviétique, États indépendants, vol. 35, n°1-2, Janvier-juin 1994. Un maître de sagesse au XX e siècle Vjačeslav Ivanov et son temps. pp. 155-170
Norwid in studies by Rolf Fieguth
Autor tego artykułu stara się przedstawić badania Rolfa Fiegutha, poświęcone twórczości Norwida, koncentrując uwagę przede wszystkim na studiach wybitnego niemieckiego slawisty o cyklu poetyckim Vade-mecum i poemacie Quidam. W pierwszej kolejności rekonstrukcji tu podlegają założenia i ustalenia studium o „poezji w fazie krytycznej” z 1985 roku, a także późniejszy szkic o komparatystycznych kontekstach cyklu wierszy Norwida z 2005 roku (opublikowany po polsku w 2011 r.). Wiele uwagi w tej części artykułu poświęca się dokonanej przez Fiegutha analizie zakłóceń w poezji autora Vade-mecum na różnych poziomach organizacji wiersza. Uwagi te dopełnia charakterystyka sformułowanej przez Fiegutha koncepcji komparatystycznej „konfrontacji międzykulturowej”, która wykracza poza dualne ujęcia twórczości literackiej, odsłaniając zawsze szeroki, europejski kontekst spotkań poetów i ich tekstów uczestniczących w procesie przenikania się kultur narodowych.
Druga część artykułu poświęcona jest książce Rolfa Fiegutha Zaproszenie do „Quidama”. Portret poematu Cypriana Norwida z 2014 roku. Refleksja o tej publikacji dotyczy nie tylko szczegółowych ustaleń jej autora na temat poematu Norwida, ale także przyjętych przez niego założeń metodologicznych, które pozwoliły odświeżyć dawny gatunek historii literatury, jakim była monografia typu „autor i dzieło”. Szerzej spośród zagadnień przedstawionych w tej książce autor artykułu omawia trudności towarzyszące lekturze Quidama i problematykę Norwidowskiego klasycyzmu.
W trzeciej części artykułu zwraca się uwagę na pojedyncze glosy Rolfa Fiegutha do jego badań nad Norwidem, pochodzące z lat ostatnich (2017, 2018, 2020). Całość artykułu jest podsumowaniem ponad trzydziestoletnich studiów Rolfa Fiegutha nad najważniejszymi poetyckimi dokonaniami polskiego poety.This article aims discusses Rolf Fieguth’s studies of works by Norwid, focusing primarily on the German Slavist’s interpretations of the cycle Vade-mecum and the long poem Quidam. The first work reconstructed here, along with its assumptions and conclusions, is Fieguth’s 1985 study on “poetry in a critical phase”and the second is the 2005 essay on the comparative contexts of Norwid’s famous cycle (the latter was published in Polish in 2011). A lot of room is devoted in this section to Fieguth’s analysis of distortions introduced by Norwid at various levels of the poem’s organization. These remarks are complemented with an account of Fieguth’s comparatist conceptof “cultural confrontation,” which goes beyond dualistic accounts of literary creativity, revealing the invariably broad, European context of meetings between poets and texts, facilitated by the process of national cultures permeating each other. The second part of the article is devoted to Fieguth’s 2014 book Zaproszenie do „Quidama”. Portret poematu Cypriana Norwida [An invitation to Quidam. A portrait of Cyprian Norwid’s long poem]. Reflections on this publication concern not only its detailed findings about Norwid’s long poem but also the critic’s methodological assumptions, which have helped him to update the long-standing genre in the history of literature, namely the “author and his particular work” type of monograph. Among the issues addressed in the book, the article discusses, in particular, the difficulties accompanying interpretations of Quidamand the question of Norwid’s classicism. The third part of the article draws attention to Fieguth’s remarks onNorwid made in recent years (2017, 2018, 2020). The article thus summarizes Rolf Fieguth’s thirty years of research on the most important poetic achievements of the Polish poet
Struggle with the century : "Czesław Miłosz and the 20th century" - an international conference in Paris
O twórczości Czesława Miłosza rozmawiali: Tomas Venclova, Alfred Sproede, Włodzimierz Bolecki, Aleksander Fiut, Rolf Fieguth, Marie Buvard, Jack Łukasiewicz, Anna Saignes, Celine Gervais, Anna Synoradzka-Demadre, Marek Tomaszewski, Ewa Bieńkowska, Jerzy Jarzębski, Marta Wyka, Michał Masłowski, Tomasz Wójcik, Maria Delaperrière. Spotkanie zorganizowało Polskie Stowarzyszenie Historyczno-Literackie, Ośrodek Cywilizacji Polskiej przy Sorbonie, Inalco (Instytut Narodowy Języków i Cywilizacji Wschodniej)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
We Asked Five Schulz Scholars… The editors’ Questionnaire
Finding by Piotr Szalsza two German language stories signed with the name “Bruno Schulz” could not be ignored by the editors of Schulz/Forum. Not yet recovered from the shock caused by the 14th issue, we are again facing a possible revelation. Unlike, however, in the case of the story titled “Undula” of 1922, which leaves no doubt that it is an early work by the author of The Cinnamon Shops, even if he preferred to use a penname, the question of the authorship of the two stories published in the Cetinjer Zeitung in 1917 and 1918 seems much more complicated. Perhaps without more research in the archives its resolution will be impossible. We asked four Schulz scholars for their opinions about the texts: Stefan Chwin, Włodzimierz Bolecki, Jerzy Jarzębski, Rolf Fieguth, and Katarzyna Lukas
- …
