1,720,974 research outputs found
Cannabidiol-enriched Cannabis sativa L. extract modulates inflammatory-induced human peripheral mononuclear cells response
No full textRecent studies propose non-psychotropic Cannabis sativa L. as a candidate drug having a role in the pathogenic mechanisms involved in inflammation [1]. In order to evaluate the biological effect of a chemically standardized extract of C. sativa var. carmagnola dried female inflorescences (CSE) and its main constituents, the purpose of this study was to investigate the modulation of cannabinoid receptors (CBr) and pro-inflammatory cytokines in an acute inflammatory stress in vitro model. CSE was chemically characterized by HPLC-DAD and GC. The CSE biological effect was investigated on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) firstly exposed to the endotoxin LPS (2, 6, 24 hours) in order to evaluate CBr and cytokines regulation. Then, cells were pre-treated with CSE and its main components at the concentration of 1 μg/ml, followed by a 2 hours stimulation with the endotoxin LPS.
CSE was found to contain cannabidiol (CBD) >20%, THC <0.6% and β-caryophyllene as principal sesquiterpene; flavonoids were found only <0.1%. Short term exposure to LPS significantly downregulated CB1r and CB2r gene expression and induced IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α release. CBr transcription resulted attenuat by pre-treatment with CSE, and more with CBD. Moreover, the LPS-induced release of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 was attenuated by CSE and CBD treatment.
C. sativa extract and its main constituent CBD were able to regulate the LPS-induced inflammatory PBMC response through the modulation of CBr expression. These results contribute to support the role of the non-psychotropic cannabis compounds in the management of the inflammatory mechanisms
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Safety and Efficacy of Red Yeast Rice Phytocomplex and Lovastatin: a Comparative Analysis
No full textIn the last 20 years, the demand for red yeast rice-based food supplements has significantly increased as consumers have been looked for natural alternatives to manage blood cholesterol levels without the adverse effects associated with synthetic statins. Actually, monacolin K, derived from red yeast rice (RYR) and chemically identical to lovastatin, inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, offering a natural alternative to synthetic drugs. In 2018, despite the health claim approved in 2011, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) raised concerns about the safety of monacolin K consumption, especially for vulnerable populations, and highlighted the lack of knowledge on RYR phytocomplex. Consequently, in 2021, the European Commission established a new maximum intake limit < 2.99 mg/day for monacolins.
This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of RYR phytocomplex compared to the sole monacolin K (=lovastatin) by analyzing eight different RYR samples with different monacolin K and secondary monacolins content. Efficacy was evaluated through a validated cell-free enzymatic assay, while an integrated in vitro simulated digestion and in silico ADME prediction were employed to compare the pharmacokinetics of different samples and lovastatin. The safety of RYR was assessed by monitoring cytotoxicity in intestinal, hepatic, kidney, and skeletal muscle cells using cell viability assays. Furthermore, muscle damage-related targets and myokines were measured by qRT-PCR in myoblasts exposed to prolonged non-toxic stimuli.
Results demonstrated that RYR samples have a large chemical variability not only related to monacolin K content, in lactone and hydroxy-acid form, but also as regards pigments, secondary monacolins, polyphenols, and triterpenes. The enzymatic test revealed that all samples were more effective in inhibiting HMG-CoA activity than lovastatin at equivalent monacolin K content. Although secondary monacolins had a weaker effect than monacolin K, a synergistic effect was observed within the phytocomplex. Additionally, the phytocomplex facilitated higher bioaccessibility of monacolin K in RYR compared to lovastatin. Regarding cell viability, lovastatin and RYR samples exhibited no toxic effects up to 150 g/mL on intestinal, hepatic, and kidney cells; however, variable effects were observed on skeletal muscle cells at medium-high concentrations. Nevertheless, at physiological non-toxic concentrations, RYR samples did not impact the expression levels of myokine IL-6, autophagy factors, and catabolic markers of protein balance, unlike synthetic statin.
These results suggest that RYR and lovastatin share similar biological activities, but the phytocomplex's contribution from secondary monacolins, pigments, polyphenols, and triterpenes ensure a superior safety profile for this botanical food supplement. However, it is important to note that the composition of RYR phytocomplex can vary significantly between different products on the market. This variability highlights the need for standardization and quality control measures to ensure the safety and efficacy of this botanical food supplement. In conclusion, our study provides evidence supporting the enhanced efficacy, bioaccessibility, and safety profile of RYR phytocomplex compared to lovastatin demonstrating its potential as a natural and effective option for hypercholesterolemia management
Safety and Efficacy of Red Yeast Rice Phytocomplex and Lovastatin: a Comparative Analysis
No full textIn the last 20 years, the demand for red yeast rice-based food supplements has significantly increased as consumers have been looked for natural alternatives to manage blood cholesterol levels without the adverse effects associated with synthetic statins. Actually, monacolin K, derived from red yeast rice (RYR) and chemically identical to lovastatin, inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, offering a natural alternative to synthetic drugs. In 2018, despite the health claim approved in 2011, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) raised concerns about the safety of monacolin K consumption, especially for vulnerable populations, and highlighted the lack of knowledge on RYR phytocomplex. Consequently, in 2021, the European Commission established a new maximum intake limit < 2.99 mg/day for monacolins.
This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of RYR phytocomplex compared to the sole monacolin K (=lovastatin) by analyzing eight different RYR samples with different monacolin K and secondary monacolins content. Efficacy was evaluated through a validated cell-free enzymatic assay, while an integrated in vitro simulated digestion and in silico ADME prediction were employed to compare the pharmacokinetics of different samples and lovastatin. The safety of RYR was assessed by monitoring cytotoxicity in intestinal, hepatic, kidney, and skeletal muscle cells using cell viability assays. Furthermore, muscle damage-related targets and myokines were measured by qRT-PCR in myoblasts exposed to prolonged non-toxic stimuli.
Results demonstrated that RYR samples have a large chemical variability not only related to monacolin K content, in lactone and hydroxy-acid form, but also as regards pigments, secondary monacolins, polyphenols, and triterpenes. The enzymatic test revealed that all samples were more effective in inhibiting HMG-CoA activity than lovastatin at equivalent monacolin K content. Although secondary monacolins had a weaker effect than monacolin K, a synergistic effect was observed within the phytocomplex. Additionally, the phytocomplex facilitated higher bioaccessibility of monacolin K in RYR compared to lovastatin. Regarding cell viability, lovastatin and RYR samples exhibited no toxic effects up to 150 g/mL on intestinal, hepatic, and kidney cells; however, variable effects were observed on skeletal muscle cells at medium-high concentrations. Nevertheless, at physiological non-toxic concentrations, RYR samples did not impact the expression levels of myokine IL-6, autophagy factors, and catabolic markers of protein balance, unlike synthetic statin.
These results suggest that RYR and lovastatin share similar biological activities, but the phytocomplex's contribution from secondary monacolins, pigments, polyphenols, and triterpenes ensure a superior safety profile for this botanical food supplement. However, it is important to note that the composition of RYR phytocomplex can vary significantly between different products on the market. This variability highlights the need for standardization and quality control measures to ensure the safety and efficacy of this botanical food supplement. In conclusion, our study provides evidence supporting the enhanced efficacy, bioaccessibility, and safety profile of RYR phytocomplex compared to lovastatin demonstrating its potential as a natural and effective option for hypercholesterolemia management
- …
