186,398 research outputs found
Rhetor : Vol. 03 (2009)
No full text200 p.
Introduction: Editorial Vicissitudes and Rhetorical Rapprochement / SYLVAIN RHEAULT -- Introduction: Vicissitudes éditoriales et rapprochements rhétoriques / SYLVAIN RHEAULT -- What's Hotter: Hell House or Global Warming? The Shifting Rhetoric of the Evangelical Right / COLIN SNOWSELL -- Rhetorical Theory and the Institutionalization of Community Service Learning in Higher Education / TANIA S. SMITH -- The Sparrow and the Shaking Tent: Containing the Convert in Two Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Ojibwe Conversion Narratives / JOHN MOFFATT -- Life on the Rock: Island and Identity in Mary Walsh's "A Hymn to Canada" / JENNIFER MACLENNAN -- Bathos: Some Canadian Examples / SHANNON PURVES-SMITH -- Communicating for Influence: Ethical Borders / JIM GOUGH -- May Sinclair: Idealism-Feminism and the Suffragist Movement / JIM GOUGH -- The Rhetorical Paradigm of Nietzsche's Aphorisms / JOSEPH SCHMIDT.Articles in English or French.Facultyye
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
No full textThis video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
Population average atlas for RecobundlesX (BundleSeg)
No full text<p><strong>Multi-atlas bundle segmentation</strong></p>
<p>This data is made to be used with the following script:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/scilus/scilpy/blob/master/scripts/scil_recognize_multi_bundles.py">https://github.com/scilus/scilpy/blob/master/scripts/scil_recognize_multi_bundles.py</a><br>
<br>
Or the following Nextflow pipeline:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/scilus/rbx_flow">https://github.com/scilus/rbx_flow</a></p>
<p>This script is in fact a multi-atlas, multi-parameters version of Garyfallidis et al. (2018) with labels fusions. We name this algorithm RecobundlesX. This version facilitates parameter exploration and stabilizes/robustifies the results from Recobundles.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Etienne St-Onge, Kurt Schilling, Francois Rheault, "BundleSeg: A versatile, reliable and reproducible approach to whitte matter bundle segmentation.", arXiv, 2308.10958 (2023)<br>
<br>
Rheault, François. "Analyse et reconstruction de faisceaux de la matière blanche." Computer Science (Université de Sherbrooke) (2020), https://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/17255</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Usage</strong><br>
Here is an example (for more details use `scil_recognize_multi_bundles.py -h`) :</p>
<p>`antsRegistrationSyNQuick.sh -d 3 -f {T1} -m mni_masked.nii.gz -t a -n 4`<br>
`scil_recognize_multi_bundles.py {TRACTOGRAM} config_fss_1.json atlas/*/ output0GenericAffine.mat --out_dir ${OUTPUT_DIR}/ --log_level DEBUG --minimal_vote 0.4 --processes 8 --seed 0 --inverse -f`</p>
<p>To facilitate interpretation, all endpoints were uniformized head/tail. To see, which side of a bundle is head or tail, you can load the atlas bundle into the software <a href="https://github.com/imeka/mi-brain ">MI-Brain</a></p>
<p><strong>Notes on bundles</strong><br>
- AC and PC were added mostly in case the atlas is used for lesion-mapping or figures. Likely, segmentation won't produce good results. This is mostly due to difficult tracking for these bundles.<br>
- The CC are split for each lobe. However, for technical consideration, the frontal portion was split in two to facilitate clustering and segmentation. For the same reason, the portion fanning to the pre/post central gyri were separated.<br>
- The streamlines present in the CC are homotopic, Recobundles will allow for variation and thus lead to 'some' heterotopy. However, it is expected that the results will be mostly homotopic.<br>
- CG has 3 possible endpoint locations. However, the full extent of the tail is difficult to track and is often missing.<br>
- FPT and POPT should terminate in the pons. However, to fully capture candidate streamlines and improve segmentation quality even streamlines reaching down the brainstem are selected. <br>
- PYT should reach down the brainstem. For similar reasons to the FPT/POPT, streamlines ending in the pons are selected. Otherwise, fanning is affected and bundles is too skinny. <br>
- OR_ML will most likely have difficulty capturing the full ML. However, this is often due to difficult tracking.<br>
- The cerebellum is often cut due to acquisition FOV. In such a case, all projection bundles will be more difficult to recognize and most cerebellum bundles will be missing (ICP, MCP, SCP).</p>
<p>See Mosaic of bundles <a href="https://i.ibb.co/n7Ln3Gf/mosaic-local.png"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>
<p><strong>Acronym</strong><br>
AC - Anterior commisure<br>
AF - Arcuate fasciculus<br>
CC_Fr_1 - Corpus callosum, Frontal lobe (most anterior part)<br>
CC_Fr_2 - Corpus callosum, Frontal lobe (most posterior part)<br>
CC_Oc - Corpus callosum, Occipital lobe<br>
CC_Pa - Corpus callosum, Parietal lobe<br>
CC_Pr_Po - Corpus callosum, Pre/Post central gyri<br>
CC_Te - Corpus callosum, Temporal lobe<br>
CG - Cingulum<br>
FAT - Frontal aslant tract<br>
FPT - Fronto-pontine tract<br>
FX - Fornix<br>
ICP - Inferior cerebellar peduncle<br>
IFOF - Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus<br>
ILF - Inferior longitudinal fasciculus<br>
MCP - Middle cerebellar peduncle<br>
MdLF - Middle longitudinal fascicle<br>
OR_ML - Optic radiation and Meyer's loop<br>
PC - Posterior commisure<br>
POPT - parieto-occipito pontine tract<br>
PYT - Pyramidal tract<br>
SCP - Superior cerebellar peduncle<br>
SLF - Superior longitudinal fasciculus<br>
UF - Uncinate fasciculus</p>
Author Rights and Scholarly Publishing
No full textOriginally posted at
http://blog.library.gsu.edu/2014/10/24/author-rights-and-scholarly-publishing/</p
Validation d'une grille d'analyse de gestion d'entreprise appliquée dans une école privée : rapport de recherche présenté à l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières /
No full textFévrier 1990Bibliogr.: f. 109-110Notes (part. bibliogr.) au bas des p
- …
