1,720,983 research outputs found
Metabolomic Profiling in Sudden Cardiac Death: Identification of Potential Biomarkers for ischaemic heart disease without myocardial changes and death due to substance abuse.
This study explored the potential of metabolomics to differentiate between sudden cardiac death caused by coronary artery disease (CAD) and death from toxic causes. By analyzing the unique chemical signatures in heart tissue, the researchers sought to identify lipid biomarkers that could improve the diagnosis of CAD-related deaths, particularly in ambiguous cases where traditional autopsy findings are inconclusive. The results revealed distinct metabolic profiles between the two groups, with specific lipids like SM 40:2;2O_A and PC 16:0_18:1_B being significantly more abundant in individuals who died from CAD. Conversely, lipids such as PI 38:4 and HexCer 18:1;2O/24:0 were more prevalent in the toxic death group. These findings suggest that metabolomics holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy in sudden cardiac death cases. Further investigation of these identified biomarkers could lead to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying sudden cardiac death and potentially pave the way for improved prevention and treatment strategies.This study explored the potential of metabolomics to differentiate between sudden cardiac death caused by coronary artery disease (CAD) and death from toxic causes. By analyzing the unique chemical signatures in heart tissue, the researchers sought to identify lipid biomarkers that could improve the diagnosis of CAD-related deaths, particularly in ambiguous cases where traditional autopsy findings are inconclusive. The results revealed distinct metabolic profiles between the two groups, with specific lipids like SM 40:2;2O_A and PC 16:0_18:1_B being significantly more abundant in individuals who died from CAD. Conversely, lipids such as PI 38:4 and HexCer 18:1;2O/24:0 were more prevalent in the toxic death group. These findings suggest that metabolomics holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy in sudden cardiac death cases. Further investigation of these identified biomarkers could lead to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying sudden cardiac death and potentially pave the way for improved prevention and treatment strategies
Medication Errors in Pediatrics: Proposals to Improve the Quality and Safety of Care Through Clinical Risk Management
Medication errors represent one of the most common causes of adverse events in pediatrics and are widely reported in the literature. Despite the awareness that children
are at increased risk for medication errors, little is known about the real incidence of the phenomenon. Most studies have focused on prescription, although medication
errors also include transcription, dispensing, dosage, administration, and certification errors. Known risk factors for therapeutic errors include parenteral infusions, oral fluid
administration, and tablet splitting, as well as the off-label use of drugs with dosages taken from adult literature. Emergency Departments and Intensive Care Units constitute
the care areas mainly affected by the phenomenon in the hospital setting. The present paper aims to identify the risk profiles in pediatric therapy to outline adequate preventive
strategies. Precisely, through the analysis of the available evidence, solutions such as standardization of recommended doses for children, electronic prescribing, targeted
training of healthcare professionals, and implementation of reporting systems will be indicated for the prevention of medication error
Spread of COVID-19 Infection in Long-Term Care Facilities of Trieste (Italy) during the Pre-Vaccination Era. Integrating Findings of 41 Forensic Autopsies with Geriatric Comorbidity Index as a Valid Option for the Assessment of Strength of Causation
Background: in 2020, a new form of coronavirus spread around the world starting from China. The older people were the population most affected by the virus worldwide, in particular in Italy where more than 90% of deaths were people over 65 years. In these people, the definition of the cause of death is tricky due to the presence of numerous comorbidities. Objective: to determine whether COVID-19 was the cause of death in a series of older adults residents of nursing care homes. Methods: 41 autopsies were performed from May to June 2020. External examination, swabs, and macroscopic and microscopic examination were performed. Results: the case series consisted of nursing home guests; 15 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 87 years. The average number of comorbidities was 4. Based only on the autopsy results, the defined cause of death was acute respiratory failure due to diffuse alveolar damage (8%) or (31%) bronchopneumonia with one or more positive swabs for SARS-CoV-2. Acute cardiac failure with one or more positive swabs for SARS-CoV-2 was indicated as the cause of death in in symptomatic (37%) and asymptomatic (10%) patients. Few patients died for septic shock (three cases), malignant neoplastic diseases (two cases), and massive digestive bleeding (one case). Conclusions: Data from post-mortem investigation were integrated with previously generated Geriatric Index of Comorbidity (GIC), resulting in four different degrees of probabilities: high (12%), intermediate (10%), low (59%), and none (19%), which define the level of strength of causation and the role of COVID-19 disease in determining death
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Liver pathology in COVID-19 related death and leading role of autopsy in the pandemic
BACKGROUND: Information on liver involvement in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is currently fragmented. AIM: To highlight the pathological changes found during the autopsy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 positive patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search on PubMed was carried out until June 21, 2022. RESULTS: A literature review reveals that pre-existing liver disease and elevation of liver enzyme in these patients are not common; liver enzyme elevations tend to be seen in those in critical conditions. Despite the poor expression of viral receptors in the liver, it seems that the virus is able to infect this organ and therefore cause liver damage. Unfortunately, to date, the search for the virus inside the liver is not frequent (16% of the cases) and only a small number show the presence of the virus. In most of the autopsy cases, macroscopic assessment is lacking, while microscopic evaluation of livers has revealed the frequent presence of congestion (42.7%) and steatosis (41.6%). Less frequent is the finding of hepatic inflammation or necrosis (19%) and portal inflammation (18%). The presence of microthrombi, frequently found in the lungs, is infrequent in the liver, with only 12% of cases presenting thrombotic formations within the vascular tree. CONCLUSION: To date, the greatest problem in interpreting these modifications remains the association of the damage with the direct action of the virus, rather than with the inflammation or alterations induced by hypoxia and hypovolemia in patients undergoing oxygen therapy and decompensated patients
Is hospital autopsy auditing suitable for clinical risk management? Actualities and perspectives of auditing in the autopsy room following Italian Law 24/2017 on patient safety
BACKGROUND: autopsies are a valuable tool for understanding the physiopathology of a disease and it is the gold standard to assess the cause of death. The clinical autopsy is the ultimate medical service for a patient and plays a crucial role in the context of quality control, education of physicians and other medical personnel, as well as mitigation of risk of malpractice claims.OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate the importance of improving an autopsy service and the relevance of this investigation procedure in daily clinical practice by evaluating the rate of major discrepancies between the assumed cause of death and the ascertained cause of death after a complete post mortem investigation. A further aim is to classify these discrepancies as class I or class II discrepancies according to Goldman's criteria in order to asses performance quality.METHODS: a retrospective study of the hospital autopsies performed from June 2018 to March 2020 was conducted by considering a diversified dataset, including age and sex of the deceased as well as the clinical and pathological causes of death.RESULTS: 362 cases were taken into consideration. Major discrepancies were found in 71.3% of cases, with a class I error of 22.7% and a class II error of 48.6%. The most frequent misdiagnoses were cardiovascular disorder, embolism and aneurism rupture.DISCUSSION: The rate of major discrepancies and the rate of class I and class II errors are way above the rate found in literature. Despite the high rate of major discrepancy evidences collected from hospital autopsies (i.e. certainty of the cause of death, unknown comorbidities) strengthened the legal defense in cases of medical malpractice litigation. In our experience, by accurately determining the cause of death, revealing new or unexpected findings and possible diagnostic or technical errors, postmortem examinations can significantly contribute to the improvement of team performance and quality of care.CONCLUSION: The presence of clinicians during autopsy and the early sharing of results can be considered a new auditing strategy for hard clinical cases. Finally, by providing a clearer understanding of the nature and cause of the illness, the autopsy results assisted in the grieving process by reassuring family members that action or inaction on their part had not contributed to the death
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
