1,720,967 research outputs found
Anatomy and development of Messinian mass-wasting deposits in submarine confined basins: examples from northwestern Apennine of Italy.
No full textEditors: Iaccarino S., Lugli S., Manzi V., Roveri M
Tectonic and climatic cyclicity in the late Messinian Lago Mare deposits bordering the Salsomaggiore structure (Northern Apennine foothills, Italy)
No full text1st EGU General Assembl
From debris flows to sliding masses in a confined basin at the toe of an orogenic wedge: the case of the Messinian mass-wasting deposits of Northwestern Apennine of Italy.
No full textPaleo-landslides shaping the messinian Northern Apennine mountain front: the example of the Salsomaggiore structure (Northern Italy)
No full text1st EGU General Assembl
The Salsomaggiore structure (Northern Apennines, Italy): evidences of paleo-landslides shaping the Messinian mountain front
No full textMessinian mass-wasting products of Northwestern Apennine foothills: from debris flows to huge slided masses in response to increasing relief steepness of an accretionary wedge
No full textSession Stratigraphy, Sedimentology and Paleontology Conveners: Jacobs P., Steuber T
Tectonic and climatic controls on sedimentation in late Miocene Cortemaggiore wedge-top basin (Northern Apennine, Italy)
No full textTectonic-climatic controls and cyclicities in Late Miocene sedimentary record of Cortemaggiore Wedge-Top Basin (Northwestern Apennines, Italy)
No full textEditors: Iaccarino S., Lugli S., Manzi V., Roveri M
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
