310,248 research outputs found
Migranti e non migranti : accogliere, ospitare e convivere
No full textQuesto saggio, attraverso le annotazioni sulle reti sociali stratificate lungo il tempo e i decenni di immigrazione straniera in Italia (Colucci 2018) e osservando tentativi di convivenza e modelli alternativi di ospitalità, ha avuto come obiettivo di illuminare alcuni interstizi (Riccio e Tarabusi 2018) potenzialmente fruttuosi per chi opera nell’accoglienza e inclusione dei migranti
The opera omnia of Giovanni Battista Riccio: a project for the valorisation of a forgotten repertoire / Gli opera omnia di Giovanni Battista Riccio: un progetto per la valorizzazione di un repertorio dimenticato,
No full textGli opera omnia di Giovanni Battista Riccio si inseriscono all'interno di un più vasto progetto per lo studio e la valorizzazione del patrimonio musicale pervenutoci in uno stato di conservazione incompleto
Schede 11 (Bartolomeo Bellano, in collaborazione con Luciana Giacomelli); 106 (Andrea Riccio); 108 (Andrea Riccio, in collaborazione con Luciana Giacomelli); 114 (Antonio Minelli); 116 (Scultore veneto); 118 (Vincenzo Grandi ?); 120(Pirgotele);121 (Pirgotele)
No full textIn queste schede vengono esaminate e studiate varie sculture venete della fine del Quattrocento e di primo Cinquecento, opera di Bartolomeo Bellano, Andrea Riccio, Antonio Minell
L'immaginazione e il senso : su alcune dimensioni dell'estetico : una conversazione con Alfredo Ferrarin
No full textuna conversazione di Agnese di Riccio e Danilo Manca con Alfredo Ferrarin a proposito del suo libro "Un mondo non di questo mondo, ISBN: 9788846765765"
Migration and Development. Reflections on an Ambivalent Relationship
No full textNowadays the Migration and Development relation is becoming a kind of “mantra” (Faist 2008) a real “discourse of development” (Grillo, Stirrat 1997) connected, as it is, with other discourses stressing community, civil society, self reliance, and, sometimes problematically, profitable investment. However, from the perspective of African hometown associations, especially those developed in France, such a connection displays a longer story. Already at the beginning of the 80’s Malian and Senegalese organisations embarked on micro-development projects aimed at their country of origin in sub-Saharan Africa (Daum 1998). Codevelopment projects, it was argued, should be ‘decentralised’, their primary movers, and the locus of their activities, are not states, but localities: local states and places, the people who inhabit them, and the institutions of civil society (NGOs, associations etc) they have created. Codevelopment circles also stress the importance of dialogue with migrants and their organisations. Their legitimate interests in the development process, it is argued, should be recognised and they should be encouraged to become ‘development actors’, dissolving the developer/developed distinction (Lavigne-Delville, 1991: 196; Quiminal 1991). What distinguishes codeveloppement from the transnational activities of migrant hometown associations is the involvement of a variety of local institutions and actors ‘here’ (regional and municipal authorities, NGOs, and associations, based locally in Europe but representing particular villages or clusters of villages where migrants originate, with funding from the state, or the EU), and counterparts (local authorities, NGOs, village associations etc) ‘there’, in the South. These activities may represent an original strategy signalling a refusal to break with countries of origin while seeking integration. However, Do these reflect the real demands of migrants or the logic of European planners, politicians, and social practitioners involved in the implementation of migration policies? This is an aspect that applied as much as academic research should always explore, moved from a healthy skepticism (Grillo, Riccio 2004). However, although one should be cautious towards a celebratory as much as pessimistic views towards co-development, a methodological opportunity needs to be recognized: by involving so many social actors, this field of research represents a laboratory for the study of such a complex and ambivalent social process, as is transnational migration. Ideally the student of migration should be working simultaneously on three fronts: with the institutions of the receiving society, among migrants themselves, and in the sending society (Grillo 1985). Therefore, it is important to combine a transnational approach with the need to bridge a divide in the studies of migration, which have tended to consider either the characteristics of an immigrant community or the characteristics of the society incorporating it. With this aim, the study of migrants’ translocal codevelopment projects represents a methodological solution to study social change (De Sardan 1995) by focussing on the interaction between the institutions of the receiving contexts, migrants’ transnational practices and the economic and socio-cultural transformations of the sending context (Riccio 2007)
Commento all’art. 12 del Regolamento (UE) 2016/679, “Informazioni, comunicazioni e modalità trasparenti per l'esercizio dei diritti dell'interessato”
No full textLa Sfida di Lepre e Riccio
No full textUna mattina Riccio va a cogliere una pannocchia in un campo non lontano dalla sua tana e scopre che Lepre ha deciso di essere l'unica proprietaria del campo di mais!
Riccio non può accettarlo, così sfida Lepre a una gara di corsa: il vincitore avrà in premio il campo.
Lepre, sicura di essere la più forte e la più veloce, accetta, ma non ha messo in conto la furbizia di Riccio, che con uno stratagemma riuscirà a vincere e a dare a Lepre una bella lezione di generosità
- …
