1,720,959 research outputs found
INDEX O TE MAU PAPA'I E TE TOMITAI AITAHI
The author index is a list that compiles the names of the authors who have contributed to a publication, allowing their works to be easily identified and accessed. This index is essential for recognizing authorship and facilitating the search for specific articles.
The scientific committee is a group of experts who advise and evaluate the quality of publications in a scientific journal. Its functions include reviewing submitted works, advising on editorial policy and promoting publication in international settings.El índice de autores es una lista que recopila los nombres de los autores que han contribuido a una publicación, permitiendo identificar y acceder fácilmente a sus trabajos. Este índice es esencial para reconocer la autoría y facilitar la búsqueda de artículos específicos.
El comité científico es un grupo de expertos que asesoran y evalúan la calidad de las publicaciones en una revista científica. Sus funciones incluyen revisar los trabajos postulados, asesorar sobre la política editorial y promover la publicación en ámbitos internacionalesO índice de autores é uma lista que compila os nomes dos autores que contribuíram para uma publicação, permitindo que seus trabalhos sejam facilmente identificados e acessados. Este índice é essencial para reconhecer autoria e facilitar a busca de artigos específicos.
O comitê científico é um grupo de especialistas que aconselham e avaliam a qualidade das publicações em um periódico científico. Suas funções incluem revisar trabalhos enviados, aconselhar sobre política editorial e promover publicações em ambientes internacionais
INSTRUÇÕES PARA AUTORES
The scientific journal CODEX of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of the University of Nariño is a means of disseminating legal and socio-legal knowledge. Its main objective is to publish research results and generate critical debates on relevant legal issues. It is aimed at lawyers, researchers, litigants, judicial, legislative and executive officials, law students and people interested in legal matters at national and international level. The journal addresses issues of private, public, social, criminal, international and humanistic law.La revista científica CODEX de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad de Nariño es un medio de divulgación del conocimiento jurídico y socio-jurídico. Su objetivo principal es publicar resultados de investigación y generar debates críticos sobre temas jurídicos relevantes. Está dirigida a abogados, investigadores, litigantes, funcionarios judiciales, legislativos y ejecutivos, estudiantes de derecho y personas interesadas en asuntos jurídicos a nivel nacional e internacional. La revista aborda temas de derecho privado, público, social, penal, internacional y humanístico.A revista científica CODEX da Faculdade de Direito e Ciências Políticas da Universidade de Nariño é um meio de divulgação de conhecimento jurídico e sociojurídico. Seu principal objetivo é publicar resultados de pesquisas e gerar debates críticos sobre questões jurídicas relevantes. É destinado a advogados, pesquisadores, litigantes, autoridades judiciais, legislativas e executivas, estudantes de direito e pessoas interessadas em questões jurídicas de âmbito nacional e internacional. A revista aborda questões de direito privado, público, social, penal, internacional e humanístico
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
