1,721,055 research outputs found

    Antioxidant status in herbaceous plants growing under elevated CO2 in mini-FACE rings

    No full text
    Here we present studies on the antioxidant status of a semi-natural grassland community, permanently growing in mini-FACE rings under elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2 (560μmol mol–1). In general, in leaves of Dactylis glomerata L. and Trifolium repens L., no differences between ambient and elevated CO2 were detected as concerns protein content, activity of oxidantscavenging enzymes (catalase, superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase and guaiacol peroxidase), and lipid peroxidation. The activity of antioxidant-regenerating enzymes (monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase and glutathione disulfide reductase) and the content of antioxidants (ascorbic acid, dehydroascorbic acid, reduced glutathione and glutathione disulfide) showed remarkable variability between leaves from plants grown in ambient and CO2-enriched mini- FACE rings. Thus, in general it can be concluded that the effects of elevated CO2 at environmentally relevant concentrations on the leaf antioxidant status of a grassland community are extremely variable, species-specific and rather limited

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore