1,798 research outputs found
Quinet (B.), Begue (P.) Étude épidémiologique des enfants migrants : expérience parisienne
No full textCharbit Yves. Quinet (B.), Begue (P.) Étude épidémiologique des enfants migrants : expérience parisienne . In: Revue européenne des migrations internationales, vol. 6, n°3,1990. p. 170
Yves-Heng Lim
No full textYves-Heng Lim est enseignant-chercheur au Département d’Etudes de Sécurité et de Criminologie de l’Université Macquarie, Sydney. Il est l’auteur de China’s Naval Power: An Offensive Realist Approach (Ashgate, 2014). Yves-Heng Lim is a lecturer at the Department of Security Studies and Criminology, Macquarie University. He is the author of China’s Naval Power: An Offensive Realist Approach (Ashgate, 2014)
Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example
No full textAn earlier draft of 6th October 2010 by Gaudry and Quinet, entitled Optimisation de l’entretien et de la régénération d’une infrastructure: exploration d’hypothèses, benefitted from comments by Bernard Caillaud and Matthieu de Lapparent and was presented without econometric tests at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Stockholm on 1st July 2011 under the title “Joint optimization of continuous maintenance and periodic renewal”. The authors thank Marc Antoni, Richard Arnott, David Meunier and Yves Puttalaz for discussions or comments, Cong-Liem Tran for computing assistance and are grateful to Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) for financial support and for allowing inclusion in this version of estimates based on databases constructed by Michel Ikonomov and Pascaline Boyer. Exploratory estimates obtained from fixed form regression specifications were presented at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Berlin on 21st June 2012 through David Meunier’s good offices
La libéralisation des chemins de fer européens au regard de l’histoire
No full textLa table ronde « La libéralisation des chemins de fer européens au regard de l’histoire : avancée, risque ou régression ? » avait pour mission de mettre en perspective historique la libéralisation des chemins de fer européens : son évolution et sa place dans une histoire à long terme, ses résultats, les nouvelles relations que ces mesures ont instituées entre gestionnaires des réseaux et exploitants de transport, entre le secteur des transports et les pouvoirs nationaux, régionaux ou locaux. Après une introduction historique assurée par Michèle Merger, chargée de recherche au CNRS, qui rappelle la directive 91/440 et ses quatre recommandations – séparation juridique et comptable de l’infrastructure des réseaux et de leur exploitation, indépendance de gestion des entreprises ferroviaires, leur assainissement financier et le libre accès de nouvelles entreprises exploitantes à l’infrastructure –, qui ont conduit à une évolution très rapide du secteur en quinze ans, quatre questions sont posées aux participants : quels sont les pays et les acteurs européens les plus réfractaires et les plus favorables à cette évolution, et quels sont leurs arguments respectifs ? Existe-t-il une typologie des réformes entreprises, conduisant à des modèles plus u moins largement diffusés ? Quel type de service ferroviaire attendons-nous et pouvons-nous attendre de cette réforme, en d’autres termes, quel est le devenir du concept de service public ferroviaire ? Qu’en est-il de la revitalisation du fret ferroviaire au lendemain de l’ouverture des corridors de fret favorisés par ces directives, quelle est la nouvelle Europe du fret ferroviaire ? Patrice Leroy, directeur honoraire de la SNCF, ancien secrétaire général adjoint du CEEP, président délégué de l’AHICF anime ensuite le débat qui réunit Yves Crozet, professeur à l’université Lumière-Lyon 2, Michel Lebœuf, directeur Développement à Voyageurs France Europe, SNCF, Hubert du Mesnil, président de RFF et Émile Quinet, professeur émérite à l’École nationale des Ponts et Chaussées.ROUND TABLE with Yves CROZET, Michel LEBŒUF, Patrice LEROY, Michèle MERGER, Hubert du MESNIL and Emile QUINET The purpose of the round table discussion of “The liberalization of European railways from a historical perspective: progress, risk, or regression?” was to put the liberalization of European railways into a historical perspective: the discussants’ goal was to define the place and evolution of this trend in an open-ended history, its results, and the new relationships that such measures have brought about between network managers and transportation operators, as well as between the transportation sector and national, regional, and local authorities. After an historical introduction provided by Michèle Merger, a researcher at the CNRS, who reminded us of the 91/440 directive and its four recommendations—the legal and accounting separation of network infrastructures and their operations, the independent management of the railway companies and their financial streamlining, and open access to the infrastructure for new operating companies—led to a very rapid evolution of the sector in fifteen years, the participants were asked four questions: which European countries and players are the most opposed to and the most in favor of this evolution, and what are their respective arguments? Is there a typology of business reform that leads to more or less widespread models? What kind of railway service is in store for us and what should we expect from such reforms? In other words, what is the future of the concept of public railway service? What will be the impact of the revitalization of rail freight in the aftermath of the opening of freight corridors advantaged by these directives? What will the new Europe of rail freight look like? Patrice Leroy, honorary director of the SNCF, former adjunct secretary general of the CEEP, and Deputy Chairman of the AHICF, then moderated the debate that brought together Yves Crozet, professor at the university Lumière-Lyon 2, Michel Leboeuf, developmental director of Voyageurs France Europe, SNCF, Hubert du Mesnil, President of the RFF, and Emile Quinet, professor emeritus at the Ecole nationale des Ponts et Chaussées
Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example
No full textAn earlier draft of 6th October 2010 by Gaudry and Quinet, entitled Optimisation de l’entretien et de la régénération d’une infrastructure: exploration d’hypothèses, benefitted from comments by Bernard Caillaud and Matthieu de Lapparent and was presented without econometric tests at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Stockholm on 1st July 2011 under the title “Joint optimization of continuous maintenance and periodic renewal”. The authors thank Marc Antoni, Richard Arnott, David Meunier and Yves Puttalaz for discussions or comments, Cong-Liem Tran for computing assistance and are grateful to Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) for financial support and for allowing inclusion in this version of estimates based on databases constructed by Michel Ikonomov and Pascaline Boyer. Exploratory estimates obtained from fixed form regression specifications were presented at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Berlin on 21st June 2012 through David Meunier’s good offices
Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example
No full textAn earlier draft of 6th October 2010 by Gaudry and Quinet, entitled Optimisation de l’entretien et de la régénération d’une infrastructure: exploration d’hypothèses, benefitted from comments by Bernard Caillaud and Matthieu de Lapparent and was presented without econometric tests at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Stockholm on 1st July 2011 under the title “Joint optimization of continuous maintenance and periodic renewal”. The authors thank Marc Antoni, Richard Arnott, David Meunier and Yves Puttalaz for discussions or comments, Cong-Liem Tran for computing assistance and are grateful to Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) for financial support and for allowing inclusion in this version of estimates based on databases constructed by Michel Ikonomov and Pascaline Boyer. Exploratory estimates obtained from fixed form regression specifications were presented at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Berlin on 21st June 2012 through David Meunier’s good offices
Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example
No full textAn earlier draft of 6th October 2010 by Gaudry and Quinet, entitled Optimisation de l’entretien et de la régénération d’une infrastructure: exploration d’hypothèses, benefitted from comments by Bernard Caillaud and Matthieu de Lapparent and was presented without econometric tests at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Stockholm on 1st July 2011 under the title “Joint optimization of continuous maintenance and periodic renewal”. The authors thank Marc Antoni, Richard Arnott, David Meunier and Yves Puttalaz for discussions or comments, Cong-Liem Tran for computing assistance and are grateful to Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) for financial support and for allowing inclusion in this version of estimates based on databases constructed by Michel Ikonomov and Pascaline Boyer. Exploratory estimates obtained from fixed form regression specifications were presented at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Berlin on 21st June 2012 through David Meunier’s good offices
Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example
No full textAn earlier draft of 6th October 2010 by Gaudry and Quinet, entitled Optimisation de l’entretien et de la régénération d’une infrastructure: exploration d’hypothèses, benefitted from comments by Bernard Caillaud and Matthieu de Lapparent and was presented without econometric tests at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Stockholm on 1st July 2011 under the title “Joint optimization of continuous maintenance and periodic renewal”. The authors thank Marc Antoni, Richard Arnott, David Meunier and Yves Puttalaz for discussions or comments, Cong-Liem Tran for computing assistance and are grateful to Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) for financial support and for allowing inclusion in this version of estimates based on databases constructed by Michel Ikonomov and Pascaline Boyer. Exploratory estimates obtained from fixed form regression specifications were presented at the Kuhmo Nectar Conference on Transportation Economics in Berlin on 21st June 2012 through David Meunier’s good offices
The question of empire today
No full textY.C. Zarka, tomando como referencia la política exterior de Estados Unidos, presenta una reflexión en perspectiva histórica, política y filosófica sobre la idea contemporánea de imperio. Los modelos del imperio romano y del imperio colonial han sido abandonados. El imperialismo contemporáneo impone su hegemonía por las vías económica y cultural. Partiendo de la dialéctica imperio-imperialismo, desde los conceptos de soberanía y democracia, el autor muestra las contradicciones internas y externas de lo que denomina repúblicas imperiales. Desde la primera perspectiva, la hegemonía imperial puede ser interpretada al mismo tiempo como la expresión y la crisis de la soberanía. Desde la segunda, la contradicción se encuentra en la justificación de una política internacional intervencionista en nombre de las ideas de libertad, república y democracia.Y.C. Zarka, has taking the foreign policy of the United States as a reference, presenting a reflection on the contemporary idea of empire in historical, political and philosophical perspective. The models of the Roman Empire and the colonial empire have been left behind. The contemporary imperialism enforces its hegemony by economy and culture. Due the empire-imperialism dialectic, the author shows the internal and external contradictions of what he names "imperial republics". For instance: the imperial hegemony can be interpreted as expression and crisis of the idea sovereignty; the interventionist international policy is justified on behalf of freedom, republic and democracy ideas.Publicad
Presentazione dell’edizione italiana di storia della Sicilia da Odisseo ai giorni nostri di Jean-Yves Frétigné
No full textPublished for the first time in 2009, for the Fayard types, and re-edited in 2018 in a "pocket" format, this History of Sicily by Jean-Yves Frétigné, with the subtitle from Odysseus to the present day, presented to the French public as an easy consultation, a "Compagnon de voyage" destined to have an excellent editorial success with over 8,000 copies sold.The Italian translation presented here does not have the presumption of concurring with the monumental works of the history of Sicily which constitute an essential reference by the same Author, as the rich bibliography in the appendix to the volume clearly testifies. Rather, it intends to offer, in just over 400 pages, the “external” look on Sicily of a French historian, as Finley, Mack Smith, Duggan or Norwich have done in the past
- …
