1,721,002 research outputs found
楚辭 = Chu ci
No full textAnnotation of Chu Ci (Verses of Chu or Songs of Chu), which is an ancient anthology of Chinese poetry traditionally attributed mainly to Qu Yuan (c.340 BC-c.278 BC) and Song Yu (c.298 BC-c.222 BC) from the Warring States period (475 BC-221 BC)Fu "Qu Yuan lie zhuan" deng封面鐫"楚辭新註", "乾隆戊午年", "居易堂藏板"框20.8 x 14.9公分, 9行20字, 白口, 四周雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心上鐫"楚辭", 中鐫卷次及篇名附"屈原列傳"
楚辭 = Chu ci
No full textAnnotation of Chu Ci (Verses of Chu or Songs of Chu), which is an ancient anthology of Chinese poetry traditionally attributed mainly to Qu Yuan (c.340 BC-c.278 BC) and Song Yu (c.298 BC-c.222 BC) from the Warring States period (475 BC-221 BC)Fu "Qu Yuan lie zhuan" deng封面鐫"楚辭新註", "乾隆戊午年", "居易堂藏板"框20.8 x 14.9公分, 9行20字, 白口, 四周雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心上鐫"楚辭", 中鐫卷次及篇名附"屈原列傳"
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
A Study on the In-depth Development of World Cultural Heritage Tourism——Taking Qu Fu as An Example
No full text本文以旅游者问卷调查为基础,对曲阜世界文化遗产旅游深度开发进行了研究。认为文化遗产旅游的深度开发应该有两个纬度的内容基于遗产特性的产品体系的深化与扩展以及旅游产品质量的提升。用因子聚类归纳了曲阜文化遗产内涵的产品表现形式,分析了产品体系开发的路径;通过满意度分析,明确了完善旅游服务质量的对策,进而提出了文化遗产旅游深度开发的基本框架模型。The paper makes a demonstrative research on the in-depth development of Qu Fu world cultural heritage tourism based on questionnaires from tourists. The authors believe that there should be two latitudes in terms of in-depth development: one is expanding the product system based on heritage features and the other is upgrading the quality of tourism products. The authors conclude the product forms of the connotation of Qu Fu cultural heritages with the method of factor clustering and analyze the path for developing product system. Through the analysis of satisfactory degree, the authors make clear the countermeasures for perfecting service quality and furthermore put forward the basic framework model for the in-depth development of cultural heritage tourism.山东省社会科学规划研究基地重点项目(批准号:05JDW13)阶段性成
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
