1,720,989 research outputs found

    Corrigendum to “Spinal dural tenting sutures in intradural tumor surgery: A technical insight” [J Clin Neurosci 61 (2019) 322–323] (Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (2019) 61 (322–323), (S0967586818315510), (10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.085))

    No full text
    The authors regret for the incorrect affiliation format for author Alessandro Frati. The corrected affiliation is shown above. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused

    Hemopatch® with fibrin glue as a dural sealant in cranial and spinal surgery. A technical note with a review of the literature

    No full text
    A major complication in cranial and spinal surgery is the post-operative occurrence of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Here we reported a technical note firstly describing the use of Hemopatch® with fibrin glue as a dural sealant in cranial and spinal neurosurgical procedures. Moreover we carried out a review of the literature. Further to the best of our knowledge this was the first series including patients submitted to different spinal surgeries in whom Hemopatch® was used as dural sealant. We prospectively collected the data of 22 patients. In all procedures, fibrin glue was applied after Hemopatch®. The mean age was 59.68 ± 10.79 years and the mean follow-up (FU) was 3.63 ± 1.46 months, respectively. Overall, Hemopatch® with fibrin glue was used in 8 cranial procedures (36.36%; all were retrosigmoid craniotomies) and 14 spinal procedures (63.64%). 9/14 spinal cases (64.28%) were incidental durotomies during a spinal decompression procedure. No CSF leak, no postoperative infection, no adverse reaction were observed during the FU in all cases. The literature search revealed only two retrospective series, reporting only patients submitted to cranial surgery for a total of 56 patients and a CSF leak occurring in 3 patients (5.35%). In conclusion, we firstly reported the feasibility and the safety of using Hemopatch® with fibrin glue as dural sealant in cranial surgery and different spinal procedures. Further larger comparative studies are needed to confirm our initial encouraging results

    Spinal cordectomy for the management of thoracic malignant intraspinal tumors in paraplegic or irreversibly, severely paraparetic patients. A technical remark

    No full text
    Background: Malignant Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor are a relatively uncommon entity affecting patients whose prognosis is quickly and relentlessly dismal. Since the ‘50s Spinal Cordectomy’ has been advocated for the surgical management of these conditions, but to date, no standard operative protocol has been reported yet. Objective: Although apparently “easy”, burdened by virtually no further risk for the neurological function in paraplegic or severely paraparetic patients, SCt conceals notable pitfalls and surgical problems that are to date not yet completely discussed. The objective of the present paper is therefore to report a detailed stepwise description of the surgical technique. Methods and results: SCt addresses the problem of reaching a surgical radicality in patients whom neurological preoperative conditions have already irreversibly declined to a deep nonfunctional motor impairment and whose preoperative Brain MRI scan rules out intracranial seeding. The dural sac along with the radicular pouches must be considered as possible seeding and recurrence locations therefore such structure should be “en-bloc” removed. The cranial medullary end of the resection should be identified on the ground of the preoperative MRI and intraoperatively confirmed with fresh histological examinations ruling out the presence of tumor cells above the cordectomy. Due to the topographic and functional medullary arterial anatomy, no SCt should be performed above T3. The risk of postoperative sagittal imbalance is high and therefore a concurrent posterior vertebral stabilization is required. Conclusion: Spinal Cordectomy is a safe and feasible “last chance” treatment to prolong survival in paraplegic or severely paraparetic patients

    The role of non-rigid cervical collar in pain relief and functional restoration after whiplash injury. a systematic review and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials

    No full text
    Purpose: Whiplash injury (WI) represents a common diagnosis at every emergency department. Several investigations have been conducted to compare the different medical managements for non-surgical cases. However, the role of the immobilization with a non-rigid cervical collar (nRCC) for pain management and range of motion (RoM) preservation has not been completely clarified. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the randomized control trials (RCTs) and a pooled analysis in order to investigate the role of the nRCC for pain management, scored through the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the RoM, by comparing the use of a nRCC (for 1–2 weeks) with a non-immobilization protocols, regardless of the association with physical therapy (PhT). Only patients with whiplash-associated disorders grade I–II were included. Due to a certain heterogeneity across the RCTs, follow-up period time range resetting was necessary in order to pool the data. Results: A total of 141 papers were reviewed; 6 of them matched the inclusion criteria and were admitted to the final study. Pooled analysis showed that nRCC does not improve the outcome in terms of VAS score and RoM trends along the follow-up. Moreover, VAS and RoM trends seem to further improve at long-term follow-up in non-immobilization associated with PhT group. Conclusions: This pooled analysis of the available RCTs shows the absence of an advantage of the immobilization protocol with a nRCC after a WI. On the contrary, non-immobilization protocols show an overall better trend of pain relief and neck mobility recovery, regardless of the association of PhT. Graphic abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Clinical Outcomes of Shunting in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

    Full text link
    Background: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is characterized by the triad of dementia, gait disturbance and urinary incontinence, all potentially reversible following a ventricu-loperitoneal shunt (VPS). This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus following a new standardized protocol. Methods: This study is designed according to the STROBE guidelines. Demographical, clinical, surgical and radiological data were collected from May 2015 to November 2019. Gait, balance and incontinence data based on the NPH European scale were collected before and after one, six and twelve months of treatment with a VPS. Clinical symptoms and changes of the stoke volume, measured on phase-contrast MRI, were used to evaluate improvement after VPS surgery. Results: One hundred and eighty-one consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 73.1 years (59–86) and mean follow-up was 38.3 months (13–50). The gait (58.5 ± 14.3 to 70.1 ± 13.4, p < 0.001), the balance (66.7 ± 21.5 to 71.7 ± 22.1, p = 0.001), continence domain (69.9 ± 20.5 to 76 ± 20, p = 0.002) scores and neuropsychological scales showed a statistically significant improvement over the follow-up. The overall improvement after 12 months was present in 91.2% of patients. An overall complication rate of 8.8% and a reoperation rate of 9.4% were recorded, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical treatment by VPS for NPH improves symptoms in most patients, when accurately selected. A standardized protocol and a multidisciplinary team dedicated to this disorder is needed to achieve an early and correct diagnosis of NPH. Follow-up with stroke volume measurement is a valuable tool for the early diagnosis of shunt malfunction or the need for valve adjustment

    Surgical approaches to the cervico-thoracic junction

    No full text
    The cervico-thoracic junction (CTJ) extends between the 7 th cervical and the 4 th thoracic vertebrae and comprehends the inferior portion of the brachial plexus and the parenchymatous, vascular and nervous structures of the upper mediastinum. The posterior surgical approaches, as the laminectomy or the arthro-pediclectomy, fail to expose the anterior spinal elements. Thus, further surgical approaches have been proposed: posterolateral, antero-lateral (thoracotomies) and purely anterior. The aim of this study was to discuss indications, key anatomical landmarks and risks of the main surgical approaches to the CTJ. Ten fresh cadavers from the Anatomical Laboratory of the University of Nantes (France) were used for the surgical dissection of the CTJ. The postero-lateral and the antero-lateral approaches were performed in 4 cadavers each and the anterior approaches were studied in 2. The postero-lateral extrapleural approach (PLEA) permits an excellent antero-lateral exposure of the T2-T4 segment, preserving the parascapular musculature integrity. The thoracotomies allow the exposure of the antero-lateral portion of the junctional vertebrae, with the limits of the intrapleural approaches. The anterior approaches, including the presternocleidomastoid cervicotomy eventually associated to the sterno-claviculotomy, expose the anterior portion of the cervical and the upper thoracic vertebrae up to T4. We believe that the PLEA performs the greater surgical exposure with minimal risk of vasculonervous damage. Among the anterior approaches, the simple cervicotomy is the most indicated procedure in case of patients with certain anatomical conditions

    Radiation-induced gliomas: Report of 10 cases and review of the literature

    No full text
    Background: Radiotherapy and more recently radiosurgery represent important therapeutic methods for the treatment of tumors and arterovenous malformations affecting the central nervous system, even though several significant side-effects have been described (radionecrosis, tumors, etc.). Gliomas induced by radiation therapy are decidedly unusual, and the first descriptions of this association only appeared in the 1960s. Methods: The pertinent literature was reviewed to yield 116 cases in which a glioma developed after radiotherapy for cranial pathologies (included 10 personal cases treated in our Institution). One of our patients had undergone radiosurgery for a cavernous angioma. Results: Patients who developed a radiation-induced glioma were younger, as a group, than those affected with so-called "spontaneous" gliomas. The tumor originated in the previously irradiated area, after average doses of 32 Gy and an average latency period of 9.6 years in accordance with the findings reported by the authors and in our experience as well. Radiotherapy had most frequently been performed for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Our Case 10 is the fourth case of intracranial tumor arising after radiosurgery to be described in the literature. Conclusions: Though rare, gliomas may represent a late complication of radiation treatment. The behavior of the radiation-induced variety of glioma does not seem to differ significantly from that of its "spontaneous" counterpart. Late complications of the radiosurgery are probably underestimated because of the relatively recent introduction of this technique. On the contrary, these should be scrupulously evaluated when deciding whether to employ this method for therapeutic purposes for relatively benign or congenital lesions (which generally affect young patients with a long life expectancy). © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
    corecore