1,720,955 research outputs found
Persistence of Abdominal Pain: Did You Check for Mesenteric Vessels?
The incidence of abnormalities regarding the celiac-mesenteric trunk (CMT) has been reported to be between 1% and 2.7%, whereas for visceral aneurysms the incidence is between 0.1% and 0.2% of the general population. Anatomical variations in the CMT may be the result of abnormal embryogenesis of the primitive segmental splanchnic arteries that supply the bowel and several abdominal organs. The clinical presentation may range from vague abdominal symptoms to aneurysm rupture with a significant mortality risk. In this case, we describe the clinical history of a 37-year-old man with postprandial abdominal pain likely related to the celiac-mesenteric trunk enlargement, associated with high resistance flow in the proximal site. Postprandial symptoms improved by avoiding large meals and surveillance for the CMT anomalies was recommended by cross-imaging including the echo-color-Doppler to assess blood flow modification
A Simplified Low-Dose 10-Day Quadruple Therapy with a Galenic Formulation of Bismuth Salicylate Is Highly Effective for Helicobacter pylori Eradication
Background: Earlier studies have shown that a modified low-dose bismuth quadruple therapy given for 10 to 14 days is highly effective for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Sardinia. However, bismuth is not universally available. Aim: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a simplified low-dose 10-day quadruple therapy containing a galenic formulation of bismuth salicylate for H. pylori infection. Patients and Methods: Adult patients positive for H. pylori infection were assigned to a quadruple therapy containing a galenic formulation of bismuth salicylate (200 mg) plus tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg, given twice a day with the midday and evening meals for 10 days. A negative stool antigen test or 13C-Urea Breath Test defined successful eradication. Compliance and adverse events were recorded 30–40 days after the end of treatment. Results: In this open-label pilot study, 42 patients were enrolled (mean age 54.1 ± 12.0 years; 64% female). Among the study participants, 35 were naïve to H. pylori treatment. The treatment regimen was completed by 41 patients, with an overall success rate of 95.1%. More specifically, the eradication rate was 95.1% PP; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 86.6–100 and 92.9% by ITT; 95%CI = 85.1–100%, respectively. For naïve patients, the cure rate was 97.1%. Compliance was excellent. Side effects were absent or mild overall. Conclusions: The modified low-dose 10-day quadruple therapy provided high eradication rates of H. pylori infection, despite the replacement of colloidal bismuth subcitrate with bismuth salicylate. In regions where bismuth is unavailable in the market, the galenic formulation should be a valid option
Association of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Results from a Case-Control Study
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
