1,720,982 research outputs found
Beta maṣāḥǝft - Pelagios Network Annotations
These is a dump of the annotations provided to the Pelagios Network from the Beta maṣāḥǝft: Manuscripts of Ethiopia and Eritrea (Schriftkultur des christlichen Äthiopiens und Eritreas: eine multimediale Forschungsumgebung project.
The latest version of the annotations can be obtained following links from the following VoID url: https://betamasaheft.eu/api/placeNames/void as documented on the Beta maṣāḥǝft: website.
The annotations follow the old Pelagios Annotations Cookbook now surpassed by Linked Places format and validated with http://peripleo.no5.at/validator
The references are to places in the Beta maṣāḥǝft: Gazetteer.
The annotations are produced by all Beta maṣāḥǝft: contributors, although the responsibility for the correctness of the present dataset is of Pietro Liuzzo
Beta maṣāḥǝft: Gazetteer
These is a dump of the Beta maṣāḥǝft: Gazetteer of places in Ethiopia provided to the Pelagios Network from the Beta maṣāḥǝft: Manuscripts of Ethiopia and Eritrea (Schriftkultur des christlichen Äthiopiens und Eritreas: eine multimediale Forschungsumgebung project.
Annotations in the Beta maṣāḥǝft - Pelagios Network Annotations point to resources which are described here.
The annotations follow the old Pelagios Gazetteer Interconnection format now surpassed by Linked Places format and are validated with http://peripleo.no5.at/validator
The entries in the Gazetteer are produced by all Beta maṣāḥǝft: contributors, although the responsibility for the correctness of the present dataset is of Pietro Liuzzo
Preface
Preface to the volume which collects the proceedings of the final conference of the European project EAGLE (Europeana network of Ancient Greek and Latin Epigraphy). The conference was held at the Sapienza University of Rome on January 28-30th 2016
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
The IGCyr project. Encoding Codes, Translating Rules, Communicating Stones in Ptolemaic Cyrene and in Contemporary Bologna.
The paper draws a parallel between the work of a bononiensis epigraphist involved in the international Inscriptions of Greek Cyrenaica project (IGCyr) – which is included in the broader Inscriptions of Libya project – and the historical patterns of (epigraphic) communication between central and local power in Ptolemaic Cyrene. In the first part, by Alice Bencivenni, the analogy of functions is used to introduce the project’s specifics; afterwards a brief survey of codes and rules adopted to shape stones for communication gives some suggestions concerning digital text transcription as a desired outcome. The second part, by Simone Agrimonti, presents HELLAS UniBo, a markup laboratory set up in Bologna in June 2013 and based on user engagement
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
