1,720,969 research outputs found
Replication Data for: Elusive indeed – The mechanical versus psychological effects of electoral rules at the district level
No full textdata and replication files for:
*2018. Philipp Harfst, Sarah C. Dingler, Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, Julian Noseck & Sven Kosanke. “Elusive Indeed – The Mechanical versus Psychological Effects of Electoral Rules at the District Level.” Electoral Studies. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.00
Replication Data for: Elusive indeed – The mechanical versus psychological effects of electoral rules at the district level
No full textdata and replication files for:
*2018. Philipp Harfst, Sarah C. Dingler, Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, Julian Noseck & Sven Kosanke. “Elusive Indeed – The Mechanical versus Psychological Effects of Electoral Rules at the District Level.” Electoral Studies. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.00
Parsing Science - Electoral Systems and Female Candidates
No full textIn this episode we talk with Laura Stephenson from the University of Western Ontario about her research into how the structures of electoral systems can shape support for female political candidates. She co-authored "Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates" with Sona N. Golder, Karine Van der Straeten, André Blais, Damien Bol, Philipp Harfst, and Jean-Francois Laslier. The article was published in the March 2017 issue of Politics & Gender
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Replication Data for: The Costs of Electoral Fraud. Establishing the Link between Degrees of Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy
No full textThese files contain the data (derivate of CSES and other data sources docuemnted in the paper) and stata do file to replicate the tables and figures in the article:
Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, Philipp Harfst & Sarah C. Dingler. 2017. “The Costs of Electoral Fraud. Establishing the Link between Degrees of Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. Vol 27(3): 350-368 . DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111.
In addition the file contain a series of robustness check
Good news: fielding women candidates doesn’t put parties at a disadvantage in elections
Get PDFWe know women are more likely to be elected under proportional representation, but it hasn’t been clear which aspects of PR benefit them. Sona N. Golder, Laura B. Stephenson, Karine van der Straeten, André Blais, Damien Bol, Philipp Harfst and Jean-François Laslier designed an experiment in which people could cast (fake) votes for (real) European Parliament candidates in three different ways. They found that having more women on the ballot does not – as some fear – put off voters
Replication Data for: The Costs of Electoral Fraud. Establishing the Link between Degrees of Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy
No full textThese files contain the data (derivate of CSES and other data sources docuemnted in the paper) and stata do file to replicate the tables and figures in the article:
Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, Philipp Harfst & Sarah C. Dingler. 2017. “The Costs of Electoral Fraud. Establishing the Link between Degrees of Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. Vol 27(3): 350-368 . DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111.
In addition the file contain a series of robustness check
- …
