117,411 research outputs found
3D structure of the phytotoxin cerato-platanin from the ascomicete fungus Ceratocystis fimbriata
No full text1H, 15N and 13C Resonance Assignments of Cerato-platanin, a Phytotoxic Protein from Ceratocystis fimbriata
No full textNMR structural studies of the cerato-platanin, a phytotoxic protein from Ceratocystis fimbriata
No full textRendimiento y calidad del grano de las variedades de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) Pantera Inia clearfield® y Pandora Inia con diferentes herbicidas.
No full textTesis presentada para optar al título de Ingeniero Agrónomo.Pantera – INIA Clearfield® corresponde a una variedad de trigo primaveral, cuya única diferencia con Pandora – INIA consiste en la introgresión de dos genes de resistencia a la familia de herbicidas Imidazolinonas (IMI). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el rendimiento y calidad industrial de Pantera – INIA Clearfield® y Pandora – INIA usando distintos tipos de herbicidas. Así, se aplicaron los tratamientos: (T1) Testigo sin herbicidas; (T2) herbicida pre emergente (Artist®) para ambas variedades; (T3) herbicida pre emergente y post emergente (Eurolightning® + MCPA) para Pantera – INIA Clearfield® y (Hussar®) para Pantera – INIA; (T4) herbicida post emergente (Eurolightning® + MCPA) para Pantera – INIA Clearfield® y (Hussar®) para Pantera – INIA y (T5) herbicida post emergente (Hussar®) para ambas variedades. Los resultados indicaron que no hubo diferencias al comparar el rendimiento entre variedades. El rendimiento más bajo fue de 8,04 T ha-1 y el mayor fue de 9,51 T ha-1. En cuanto a la calidad, no se encontraron diferencias para las variables sedimentación y peso hectolitro. Sin embargo, para la variable gluten húmedo, Pandora – INIA presentó un mayor porcentaje que la variedad Pantera –INIA Clearfield®, cuyas medias fueron de 30,07 % y 26,57 %, respectivamente.Facultad de AgronomíaDepartamento de Producción VegetalChillá
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Cerato-platanin, a Phytotoxic Protein from Ceratocystis fimbriata: Expression in Pichia pastoris, Purification and Characterization
No full textThe NMR-derived Structure of Cerato-Ulmin, a Phytotoxic Hydrophobin, in the Monomeric Form
No full textStructural and Functional Characterization of Cerato-Platanin, a Fungal Phytotoxic Protein
No full text
- …
