130,459 research outputs found
Riethia pantera Trivinho-Strixino & Shimabukuro 2018, sp. n.
No full textRiethia pantera sp. n. (Fig. 8) Type material. Holotype: Male, slide mounted in Euparal, Brazil, AM, Presidente Figueiredo, Estrada de Balbina, Recanto da Pantera, 0 2 0 00’41”S, 60 0 01’32”W, 22.iii.2008, leg. Dantas, G.P.S. (I1-10, LEIA-UFSCar). Paratypes: 2 males, Brazil, AM, Manaus, RF Ducke, Igarapé Ipiranga, 05.iv.2017, leg. Dantas GPS ((I1-12 ND 13, LEIA- UFSCar). Derivatio nominis. Refers to the name of the type-locality: Recanto da Pantera. The specific epithet is treated as a noun in apposition. Diagnostic characters. Riethia pantera sp. n. differs from other species of the genus by the combination of the following characters. Male: hypopygium with superior volsella hooklike, basally pubescent and with two large setae; distal internal margin with four long simple setae. Median volsella present. Inferior volsella with seven internal marginal large scales and numerous dorsal apically pectinate and non-pectinate setae. Transverse sternapodeme with oral projections. Description. Male (n = 1) Total length near 5.30 mm. Wing length 2.40–2.46 mm. Colouration. Thorax and abdomen brown. Legs light brown. Head. Temporal with 20–21 setae. Eye with broad dorsomedial extension. Clypeus with 25–31 setae. Antenna 1.57 mm long; AR 1.97 (1). Palpomere 2–5 (1) lengths: 62, 181, 169, 238 µm. Thorax (Fig. 8a). 1.46 mm long. Ac presents; Dc 10–11; Pa 4; Supra 1; Scts 11–14. Wings (Fig. 8b). Width 0.65 mm. VR 1.14–1.20. Brachiolum with two setae. Veins setae on R with 19, R1 with 16, and R4+5 with 18 setae. Squama with 14–20 setae. Legs. Spur of fore tibia 75 µm. Tibial combs of mid and hind legs partially fused; mid tibial spur anterior, 87– 89 µm, posterior 94–103 µm long; hind tibial spur anterior, 89–106 µm, posterior 118–119 µm long. Lengths and proportions of legs as in Table IV. TABLE IV. Lengths (in µm) and proportions of legs of Riethia pantera sp. n. male (2). Hypopygium (Fig. 8c, d). Anal point absent. Laterosternite with two setae. Transverse sternapodeme 105 µm long, with weak oral projections. Phallapodeme 91 µm long. Gonocoxite 138 µm long. Superior volsella hooklike basally pubescent, with four preapical simple setae and two basal larger setae (Fig. 8e). Median volsella short with two simple setae. Inferior volsella pubescent with seven marginal broad scales (Fig. 8f) and numerous simple and apically pectinate dorsal setae (Fig. 8g). Gonostylus 203 µm long. HR 0.68.Published as part of Trivinho-Strixino, Susana & Shimabukuro, Erika Mayumi, 2018, Brazilian Pseudochironomini (Diptera: Chironomidae) Part 2. New Pseudochironomus and Riethia species, pp. 245-260 in Zootaxa 4403 (2) on pages 254-255, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4403.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/121214
MeSH term explosion and author rank improve expert recommendations
No full textInformation overload is an often-cited phenomenon that reduces the productivity, efficiency and efficacy of scientists. One challenge for scientists is to find appropriate collaborators in their research. The literature describes various solutions to the problem of expertise location, but most current approaches do not appear to be very suitable for expert recommendations in biomedical research. In this study, we present the development and initial evaluation of a vector space model-based algorithm to calculate researcher similarity using four inputs: 1) MeSH terms of publications; 2) MeSH terms and author rank; 3) exploded MeSH terms; and 4) exploded MeSH terms and author rank. We developed and evaluated the algorithm using a data set of 17,525 authors and their 22,542 papers. On average, our algorithms correctly predicted 2.5 of the top 5/10 coauthors of individual scientists. Exploded MeSH and author rank outperformed all other algorithms in accuracy, followed closely by MeSH and author rank. Our results show that the accuracy of MeSH term-based matching can be enhanced with other metadata such as author rank
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
"Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"
No full textBoth spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Scholarly Communication and Publishing Lunch and Learn Talk #11: The ULS Open Access Author Fee Fund
No full textAt the May 2014 talk, you will learn about the ULS Open Access Author Fee Fund--what it is, why we do it, how it works, and how the program is going so far
The R&D Tax Incentives
No full textThis article sets out some background information and reflections of the author on the R&D tax incentive schemes included in the Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) Proposal. In particular the author analyzes the stimulus to private R&D through ad hoc tax incentives included in the CCTB Proposal and dives into the actual provisions included in the Proposal highlighting the most relevant issues connected with their design and interpretation. Moreover, the author explores the interaction between the CCTB Proposal and the granting by Member States of domestic R&D tax incentives
- …
