1,722,415 research outputs found

    Combining individual and aggregated data to investigate the role of socioeconomic disparities on cancer burden in Italy

    No full text
    Quantifying socioeconomic disparities and understanding the roots of inequalities are growing topics in cancer research. However, socioeconomic differences are challenging to investigate mainly due to the lack of accurate data at individual-level, while aggregate indicators are only partially informative. We implemented a multiple imputation algorithm within a statistical matching framework that combines diverse sources of data to estimate individual-level associations between income and risk of breast and lung cancer, adjusting for potential confounding factors in Italy. The framework is computationally flexible and can be adapted to similar contexts

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    A serologic survey of Helicobacter pylori infection in 3281 Italian patients endoscoped for upper gastrointestinal symptoms

    No full text
    Aim: To assess the seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a large series of patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms referred for their first upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and to evaluate any association with disease. Methods: A large survey of 3281 dyspeptic patients undergoing their first endoscopic examination was undertaken, involving 93 centres in Italy. A blood sample was taken from each participant, for measuring IgG antibodies against H. pylori using a commercially available kit, and two biopsies of the antral gastric mucosa were obtained for evaluating a Giemsa-stained specimen. Results: Endoscopic macroscopic diagnoses included normal mucosa (25.3%), gastroduodenitis (51.6%), gastric and duodenal ulcers (3.7 and 14.9%, respectively) and other conditions, including gastric cancer (0.8%). Overall, the seroprevalence result was 71.3% with a strong positive association with increasing age and male sex and a negative one with educational level. According to endoscopic diagnoses, the association with H. pylori seropositivity was highest for duodenal and gastric ulcer (multivariate odds ratio: 6.1 and 2.2) and lowest for carcinoma. The comparison between the results of serology and the single Giemsa-stained specimen showed good reliability of H. pylori IgG, particularly in a subgroup (n = 2056) for which the interpretation was performed by a single dedicated pathologist: sensitivity and specificity were 92 and 78%, respectively. Conclusion: Commercial IgG serology is a reliable tool for the assessment of H. pylori infection in large-scale multicentre surveys. A very high seroprevalence among dyspeptic patients was confirmed, particularly in the presence of peptic disease. Factors associated with the infection were very similar to those usually reported in the general population, but male patients showed a significantly higher prevalence

    Age, Helicobacter pylori and/or CagA antibodies as a pre-endoscopic screening policy

    No full text
    Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has become the investigation of choice for dyspeptic patients, and this means prolonged waiting lists and large health care costs. For these reasons, over the past few years several pre-endoscopic screenings policies have been proposed in an attempt to reduce the number of patients referred to endoscopy, without missing important disease

    Nab-paclitaxel after docetaxel hypersensitivity reaction: case report and literature review

    No full text
    Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are one of the most active cytotoxic agents in breast cancer  treatment  including  Her-2  positive  subtype characterized  by  aggressive  clinical  and pathological features since the early stage. However, their use is sometimes limited by the occurrence of hypersensivity reactions (HSRs) characterized by erythematous rashes, bronchospasm, respiratory distress, hypotension, and pulmonary edema. Cross-reactions between paclitaxel and docetaxel are described in literature with a rate ranging from 49% to 90%. Abraxane (nab-paclitaxel), an albumin-bound form of paclitaxel, has a different toxicity profile from solvent-based paclitaxel and a lower rate of HSRs. Interestingly, several authors have recently reported cases of patients who developed HSRs to taxanes, principally paclitaxel, and were then safety treated with Abraxane, suggesting the absence of cross-reactivity between these drugs. Based on these considerations, we report our clinical experience and perform a literature review on this topic with the aim to investigate the cross-reactivity between nab-paclitaxel and other taxanes, in particular with docetaxel
    corecore