1,721,243 research outputs found
sj-docx-1-chi-10.1177_17423953231153337 - Supplemental material for Contextual factors for the successful implementation of self-management interventions for chronic diseases: A qualitative review of reviews
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-chi-10.1177_17423953231153337 for Contextual factors for the successful implementation of self-management interventions for chronic diseases: A qualitative review of reviews by Janneke Noordman, Maaike Meurs, Rune Poortvliet, Tamara Rusman, Carola Orrego-Villagran, Marta Ballester, Lyudmil Ninov, Ena Niño de Guzmán, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Oliver Groene, Rosa Suñol, Monique Heijmans and Cordula Wagner in Chronic Illness</p
Comparison of the quality of the guidelines studied in this report with those studied by Chen (Chinese CPG) and Alonso-Coello (world CPG).
No full text<p>This graph depicts AGREE scores: (A) Mean domain scores as reported in this study. (B) Mean domain scores evaluated on clinical guidelines in China by ChenYL. (C) Mean domain scores as reported by Pablo Alonso-Coello.</p
Author Correction: AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions: appraisal instrument (Surgical Endoscopy, (2022), 36, 8, (5547-5558), 10.1007/s00464-022-09354-z)
No full textThis article was updated to correct Alessandro Montedori’s name. Collaborative authorship: The GAP Consortium: Yasser Sami Abdel Dayem, Luca Bertolaccini, Pablo Alonso- Coello, Elie Akl, Manish Chand, John J. Como, Gert J. de Borst, Salomone Di Saverio, Sameh Emile, Bang Wool Eom, Ramon Gorter, George Hanna, Kaisa Immonen, Quirino Lai, Nicolaas Lumen, Joseph L. Mathew, Alessandro Montendori, Martin Moya, Gianluca Pellino, Alvaro Sanabria, Athanasios Saratzis, Neil Smart, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Giovanni Zaninotto
Author Correction: AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions: appraisal instrument (Surgical Endoscopy, (2022), 36, 8, (5547-5558), 10.1007/s00464-022-09354-z)
No full textThis article was updated to correct Alessandro Montedori’s name. Collaborative authorship: The GAP Consortium: Yasser Sami Abdel Dayem, Luca Bertolaccini, Pablo Alonso- Coello, Elie Akl, Manish Chand, John J. Como, Gert J. de Borst, Salomone Di Saverio, Sameh Emile, Bang Wool Eom, Ramon Gorter, George Hanna, Kaisa Immonen, Quirino Lai, Nicolaas Lumen, Joseph L. Mathew, Alessandro Montendori, Martin Moya, Gianluca Pellino, Alvaro Sanabria, Athanasios Saratzis, Neil Smart, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Giovanni Zaninotto
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Un investigador Miguel Servet entra en la lista de los científicos más citados del mundo
No full textNota de prensa sobre Pablo Alonso Coello, investigador del Programa Miguel Servet del Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano figura como uno de los científicos más citados del mundo. El programa Miguel Servet del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII ) posibilita la incorporación de investigadores a tiempo completo en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Este programa se convoca desde el año 1998, es una de las subvenciones de recursos humanos más veteranas del ISCIII y hasta la fecha han formado parte del mismo un total de 758 profesionale
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
