1,721,216 research outputs found
Threats to Avifauna on Oceanic Islands Revisited
No full textTim M. Blackburn, Phillip Cassey, Richard P. Duncan, Karl L. Evans, and Kevin J. Gasto
Maturity matters for movement and metabolic rate: trait dynamics across the early adult life of red flour beetles
No full textAbstract not availablePieter A. Arnold, Phillip Cassey, Craig R. Whit
The evolutionary causes of egg rejection in European thrushes (Turdus spp.): a reply to M. Soler
Full text linkPeter Samas, Mark E Hauber, Phillip Cassey, and Tomas Gri
Foreword: The ecology and impact of non-indigenous birds
No full textDaniel Sol, Tim Blackburn, Phillip Cassey, Richard Duncan and Jordi Clavellhttp://trove.nla.gov.au/work/2287250
Targeting season and age for optimizing control of invasive rabbits
Full text linkAbstract not availableKonstans Wells, Phillip Cassey, Ron G. Sinclair, Greg J. Mutze, David E. Peacock, Robert C. Lacy, Brian D. Cooke, Robert B. O’Hara, Barry W. Brook, Damien A. Fordha
Response to Comment on "Avian Extinction and Mammalian Introductions on Oceanic Islands"
No full textTim M. Blackburn, Phillip Cassey, Richard P. Duncan, Karl L. Evans and Kevin J. Gasto
Early life stress shapes female reproductive strategy through eggshell pigmentation in Japanese quail
No full textAbstract not availableCamille Duval, Cédric Zimmer, Ivan Mikšík, Phillip Cassey, Karen A. Spence
Prescribed burning impacts avian diversity and disadvantages woodland-specialist birds unless long-unburnt habitat is retained
No full textAbstract not availableThomas A.A. Prowse, Stuart J. Collard, Alice Blackwood, Patrick J. O'Connor Steven Delean, Megan Barnes, Phillip Cassey, Hugh P. Possingha
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
