1,721,121 research outputs found

    Changes of the main isoform of human apolipoprotein A-I following incubation of plasma.

    No full text
    AbstractThis study was aimed to ascertain whether the more acidic isoforms of plasma apo A-I (A-I-1 and A-I-2) could originate in vitro from the main plasma isoform (A-I0). Apo A-I isoforms were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis before and after a prolonged incubation of serum or EDTA-plasma at 37 degrees C. Incubated plasma there was a marked decrease of apo A-I0 and a concomitant linear increase of apo A-I-1 + and A-I-2. The relative content of the latter raised from 22 +/- 7% before the incubation to 60 +/- 7% after 48 h of incubation. This conversion of A-I0 was not inhibited by either pre-heating of plasma at 60 degrees C for 1 h or the addition of protease inhibitors, EDTA and p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonic acid. The conversion of apo A-I0 was not observed in isolated HDL, incubated either in the absence or in the presence of d less than 1.063 g/ml lipoproteins and lipoprotein deficient plasma, nor in plasma which had been dialyzed before being incubated at 37 degrees C. This suggests that plasma contains a low molecular weight factor capable of promoting the conversion of A-I0. The increase of the relative content of apo A-I-1 and apo A-I-2 in incubated plasma was not due to glucosylation or carbamylation of A-I0 as no radioactive glucose and urea were found to be bound to A-I. Since the conversion of apo A-I0 was prevented by the addition of an antioxidant (butylated hydroxytoluene, BHT) to the incubated plasma it is conceivable that some product of lipid peroxidation renders apo A-I0 more electronegative by reacting with some free amino groups of this peptid

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore