1,720,958 research outputs found
Cosmological Applications of Extended Theories of Gravity
This work investigates the cosmological applications of higher-order theories of gravity in four dimensions. In particular, we begin dealing with the possibility to obtain massive modes in the framework of effective field theories recovered by extending General Relativity and taking into account generic functions of the curvature invariants. In particular, adopting the minimal extension of f(R) gravity, an effective field theory with massive modes is straightforwardly recovered. This approach allows to evade shortcomings like ghosts and discontinuities if a suitable choice of expansion parameters is performed. Next, we stress one of the most important problem related to Extended Theories of Gravity that is the lack of a definitive, unique theory able to address the different shortcomings of General Relativity. In fact, several models have been proposed in order to address the dark side problem in cosmology and these models should be constrained also at ultraviolet scales in order to achieve a correct fundamental interpretation. We proceed analyzing the possibility to constrain f(R) theories at UV scales comparing quantum vacuum states in given cosmological back- grounds. Specifically, we compare Bogolubov transformations associated to different vacuum states for some f(R) models. The procedure consists in fixing the f(R) free parameters by requiring that the Bogolubov coefficients can be correspondingly mini- mized to be in agreement with both high redshift observations and quantum field theory predictions. In such a way, the particle production is related to the value of the Hubble parameter and then to the given f (R) model. The approach is developed in both metric and Palatini formalism.
The second part of this thesis is devoted to the search for exact solutions for Ex- tended Theories of Gravity that is very useful in order to control the physical meaning of these theories. To this goal, useful tools are Noether and Hojman approaches. The application of Hojman conservation theorem is presented in the framework of scalar-tensor cosmologies allowing to fix the form of the coupling F (φ), of the potential V (φ)
and to find out exact solutions for related cosmological models. Afterwards, Noether point symmetries are applied to metric-Palatini hybrid gravity in order to select the f(R) functional form, to find analytical solutions for the field equations and for the related Wheeler-DeWitt equation and finally to Gauss-Bonnet cosmological models,
where F is a generic function of the curvature scalar R and the Gauss-Bonnet topological invariant G, showing that the functional form of the F(R,G) function can be determined by the presence of symmetries. Exact solutions for some specific cosmological models are found out. Finally, cosmological inflation is discussed in the framework of F(R,G) gravity. In principle, this theory can exhaust all the curvature
budget related to curvature invariants. Cosmological dynamics is analysed resulting driven by two effective scalar fields, specifically a R scalaron and a G scalaron, working respectively at early and very early epochs of cosmic evolution. In this sense, a double inflationary scenario naturally emerges
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
