1,721,191 research outputs found

    Entire solutions of singular elliptic inequalities on complete manifolds

    Full text link
    We present some qualitative properties for solutions of singular quasilinear elliptic differential inequalities on complete Riemannian manifolds, such as the validity of the weak maximum principle at infinity, and non-existence results

    Existence results of radial solutions for quasilinear equations

    No full text
    Existence of nontrivial nonnegative radial solutions of quasilinear equations -\div(A(|\grad u|) \grad u)=f(u) in Rn\hbox{\bf R}^n is proved under general assumptions on the nonlinearity ff and the function AA, without requiring homogeneity

    The Data Shake: An Opportunity for Experiment-Driven Policy Making

    Full text link
    The wider availability of data and the growing technological advancements in data collection, management, and analysis introduce unprecedented opportunities, as well as complexity in policy making. This condition questions the very basis of the policy making process towards new interpretative models. Growing data availability, in fact, increasingly affects the way we analyse urban problems and make decisions for cities: data are a promising resource for more effective decisions, as well as for better interacting with the context where decisions are implemented. By dealing with the operative implications in the use of a growing amount of available data in policy making processes, this contribution starts discussing the chance offered by data in the design, implementation, and evaluation of a planning policy, with a critical review of the evidence-based policy making approaches; then it introduces the relevance of data in the policy design experiments and the conditions for its uses

    Turning Data into Actionable Policy Insights

    Full text link
    It is becoming clearer that data-supported input is essential in the policy making process. But at which point of the process, and in which format, can data aid policy making? And what does an organisation need to turn data into relevant insights? This paper explores the role of data from two perspectives. In the first part, data and data analysis are situated in the policy making process by mapping them onto the data supported policy making model and highlighting the different roles they can assume in each stage and step of the process. The second part discusses a practical framework for policy-oriented data activities, zooming in on the data-specific actions and the actors performing them in each data-supported step of the policy making process. We observe that a close collaboration between the policy maker and data scientist in the framework of an iterative approach permits to transform the policy question into a suited data analysis question and deliver relevant insights with the flexibility desired by decision makers. In conclusion, for data to be turned into actionable policy insights it is vital to set up structures that ensure the presence and the collaboration of policy-oriented and data-oriented competences

    On weak solutions of nonlinear weighted p-Laplacian elliptic inequalities

    No full text
    In this paper we give sufficient conditions for the nonexistence of nonnegative nontrivial entire weak solutions of class of p-Laplacian elliptic inequalities with possibly singular weights. In order to get the results a new Omori–Yau type principle is used. We complement our nonexistence results by establishing existence of infinitely many positive radial solutions each of which blows up at some finite R>0. Finally, a criterium for the existence of positive entire large radial solutions of class is also established

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore