1,720,960 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
The human element in judicial decision-making:The role of personal attitudes
Get PDFThe dissertation aims to gain insight into the role personal attitudes play in the professional judicial decision-making process. It builds on (i) insights from legal theory on the human element of judicial decision-making and on judicial impartiality, and (ii) what is known from psychological research about the role personal attitudes play in daily decision-making. Based on these theoretical perspectives it can be argued that empirical research on what role judges’ personal attitudes have in their decision-making is lacking. 77 semi-structured interviews were held with Dutch first instance court judges from three different district courts and from all areas of law. The results of these interviews provided insight into whether judges think personal attitudes play a role in their decision-making, and if so, how, and into whether judges experience a conflict between their personal attitudes and their impartiality. Additionally, an experimental vignette study was conducted to explore if, in an experimental setting, attitudes would be present when judges rule in a fictitious case and whether this has a direct effect on the decisional outcome. This dissertation underlines the importance of personal attitudes in the judicial decision-making while at the same time presenting a more intricate picture of their role. It opens a critical conversation about acknowledging and addressing the human element within judicial reasoning, aiming to foster a judicial process that is as fair and unbiased as humanly possible
The human element in judicial decision-making:The role of personal attitudes
Get PDFThe dissertation aims to gain insight into the role personal attitudes play in the professional judicial decision-making process. It builds on (i) insights from legal theory on the human element of judicial decision-making and on judicial impartiality, and (ii) what is known from psychological research about the role personal attitudes play in daily decision-making. Based on these theoretical perspectives it can be argued that empirical research on what role judges’ personal attitudes have in their decision-making is lacking. 77 semi-structured interviews were held with Dutch first instance court judges from three different district courts and from all areas of law. The results of these interviews provided insight into whether judges think personal attitudes play a role in their decision-making, and if so, how, and into whether judges experience a conflict between their personal attitudes and their impartiality. Additionally, an experimental vignette study was conducted to explore if, in an experimental setting, attitudes would be present when judges rule in a fictitious case and whether this has a direct effect on the decisional outcome. This dissertation underlines the importance of personal attitudes in the judicial decision-making while at the same time presenting a more intricate picture of their role. It opens a critical conversation about acknowledging and addressing the human element within judicial reasoning, aiming to foster a judicial process that is as fair and unbiased as humanly possible
The human element in judicial decision-making:The role of personal attitudes
No full textThe dissertation aims to gain insight into the role personal attitudes play in the professional judicial decision-making process. It builds on (i) insights from legal theory on the human element of judicial decision-making and on judicial impartiality, and (ii) what is known from psychological research about the role personal attitudes play in daily decision-making. Based on these theoretical perspectives it can be argued that empirical research on what role judges’ personal attitudes have in their decision-making is lacking. 77 semi-structured interviews were held with Dutch first instance court judges from three different district courts and from all areas of law. The results of these interviews provided insight into whether judges think personal attitudes play a role in their decision-making, and if so, how, and into whether judges experience a conflict between their personal attitudes and their impartiality. Additionally, an experimental vignette study was conducted to explore if, in an experimental setting, attitudes would be present when judges rule in a fictitious case and whether this has a direct effect on the decisional outcome. This dissertation underlines the importance of personal attitudes in the judicial decision-making while at the same time presenting a more intricate picture of their role. It opens a critical conversation about acknowledging and addressing the human element within judicial reasoning, aiming to foster a judicial process that is as fair and unbiased as humanly possible
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
