1,720,991 research outputs found

    Adrenergic regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone in calf digital artery

    No full text
    Radioligand binding studies and functional assays on isolated smooth muscle preparations were performed in order to obtain a biochemical and functional characterization of the b-adrenoceptor (b-AR) subtypes involved in regulation of the smooth muscle relaxation of the calf’s common digital artery. The results indicate that the common digital artery possesses two b-AR populations (40% b1 and 60% b2) and the b2-subtype appears to predominate as far as function is concerned. Only the b2-AR agonists clenbuterol and fenoterol caused doserelated relaxant effects, antagonized by propranolol, when tested in preparations precontracted both with PGF2a (1.4 · 10)5 M) and noradrenaline (1.2 · 10)6 M). In noradrenaline precontracted preparations the b1-AR selective agonists dobutamine and xamoterol caused vasodilation which was not antagonized by (±)propranolol. While the functional relaxant effects of dobutamine may be attributed to its potent competitive a-AR blocking activity, further investigations are required to explain the effect of xamoterol. The vasodilator effect of (±)isoproterenol was irregular. The recorded contractile effects, mainly at dosages greater than 10)6 M, suggest the loss of drug selectivity for b-AR and a-AR activation. Indirect evidence indicates that the aadrenoceptor (a-AR) population in this tissue which produces a strong contraction is functionally dominant over the b-AR, suggesting limited therapeutic benefit for b-AR drugs to control blood flow disorders in the calf’s distal limb

    Caratterizzazione funzionale dei sottotipi recettoriali α-adrenergici del miometrio di bovino

    No full text
    (selezionato per pubblicazione nel Volume: Annual Meeting Selected Abstracts, 2001; Anno III; pp. 114-115; lingua Inglese: "Functional characterization of α-adrenoceptor subtypes in isolated bovine myometrium"

    Are veterinary students using technologies and online learning resources for didactic training? A mini-meta analysis.

    No full text
    Over the last years, there has been an increase in online educational resources and media de-vice use for educational purposes in veterinary settings. However, an overall analysis of these studies providing measurements of the use of learning resources and media devices could be particularly useful for veterinary teachers. The evolution of technology, coupled with the ad-vent of pandemic-related restrictions in person lessons, has made it imperative that educa-tors consider how students may access educational material, as well as what type of educa-tional material may be available to them. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, CAB Ab-stracts, and Web of Sciences were searched for relevant studies from January 2012 to June 2022. A mini-meta-analysis for proportions was performed using RStudio. Results highlight a high use of portable media devices with differences among countries, continued good use of traditional textbooks, moderate use of online tools, and low use of research papers. The re-sults suggest that despite living in a technologically advanced world, veterinary students have attitudes towards digital resources that cannot be assume

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore