1,721,024 research outputs found
The role of sex and gender in hypertension
Hypertension (HTN) is a critical primary modifiable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases, with recognized sex-based differences. While sex refers to one's biological genetic makeup and attributes, gender encompasses the individual's psycho-socio-cultural characteristics, including their environment and living conditions. The impact of each gendered variable may differ amongst men and women with respect to HTN. Applying a sex and gender-based lenses to inform our understanding of HTN has the potential to unveil important contributors of HTN-related cardiovascular outcomes. For instance, increased life stressors, work related anxiety and depression, typically have more pronounced effect on women than men with HTN. The impact of social surrounding including marital status and social support on HTN also differs amongst men and women. While married men are less likely to have higher blood pressure, single women, and those who never married are less likely to have HTN. Additionally, the beneficial role of social support is more pronounced in more historically marginalized cultural groups compared to majority. Finally, socioeconomic status, including education level and income have a linear and inverse relationship in blood pressure control in more resource-rich countries. The aim of this review is to summarize how sex and gender interact in shaping the clinical course of HTN demonstrating the importance of both sex and gender in HTN risk and its treatment. Hence, when investigating the role of gendered factors in HTN it is imperative to consider cultural, and social settings. In this narrative we found that employment and education play a significant role in manifestation and control of HTN particularly in women
Demystifying How to Incorporate Sex and Gender Into Cardiovascular Research: A Practical Guide
Understanding the role of biological sex and sociocultural
gender in cardiovascular medicine is one of the first steps
toward personalized medicine. Sex- and gender-based
analysis (SGBA) seeks to systematically incorporate sex
and gender-related variables as well as the intersectionality with other factors in medical research, with the goal
of providing evidence for equitable cardiovascular clinical
practice. This article outlines simple steps that summarize
an approach to SGBA that may ultimately be a game
changer in cardiovascular research and practic
Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in men and women worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing. Management of AF is guided by evidence-based clinical practice guidelines which provide recommendations based on available evidence. The extent of sex-specific data in the AF literature used to provide guideline recommendations has not been investigated. Therefore, using the 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) AF management guidelines as an example, the purpose of this study was to review female representation and the reporting of sex-disaggregated data in the studies referenced in AF guidelines.Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective cohorts were screened to calculate the proportion of study participants who were female and to establish whether studies provided sex-disaggregated analyses. The participant-prevalence ratio (PPR), a quotient of the female participant rate and the prevalence of women in the AF population, was calculated for each study.Results: A total of 885 studies included in the CCS guidelines were considered. Of those, 467 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, women represented 39.1% of the population over all of the studies and RCTs had the lowest proportions of women (33.8%, PPR 0.70). Of studies with sex-disaggregated analyses (n = 140; 29.9%), single-centre RCTs and retrospective cohorts had the lowest and highest rates of sex-specific analyses, respectively (11.5% and 32.5%).Conclusions: The evidence used to derive guideline recommendations may be inadequate for sex-specific recommendations. Until enough data can support women-specific guidelines, increased inclusion of females in AF studies, may aid in the precision of recommendations
Impact of Sex‐ and Gender‐Related Factors on Length of Stay Following Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicountry Analysis
Background Gender‐related factors are psycho‐socio‐cultural characteristics and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction, independent of sex. Whether sex‐ and gender‐related factors contribute to the substantial heterogeneity in hospital length of stay (LOS) among patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction remains unknown. Methods and Results This observational cohort study combined and analyzed data from the GENESIS‐PRAXY (Gender and Sex Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Beyond Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome study), EVA (Endocrine Vascular Disease Approach study), and VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI [Acute Myocardial Infarction] Patients study) cohorts of adults hospitalized across Canada, the United States, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, and Australia for non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. In total, 5219 participants were assessed for eligibility. Sixty‐three patients were excluded for missing LOS, and 2938 were excluded because of no non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis. In total, 2218 participants were analyzed (66% women; mean±SD age, 48.5±7.9 years; 67.8% in the United States). Individuals with longer LOS (51%) were more likely to be White race, were more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, and a lower income, and were less likely to be employed and have completed secondary education. No univariate association between sex and LOS was observed. In the adjusted multivariable model, age (0.62 d/10 y; P<0.001), unemployment (0.63 days; P=0.01), and some of countries included relative to Canada (Italy, 4.1 days; Spain, 1.7 days; and the United States, −1.0 days; all P<0.001) were independently associated with longer LOS. Medical history mediated the effect of employment on LOS. No interaction between sex and employment was observed. Longer LOS was associated with increased 12‐month all‐cause mortality. Conclusions Older age, unemployment, and country of hospitalization were independent predictors of LOS, regardless of sex. Individuals employed with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction were more likely to experience shorter LOS. Sociocultural factors represent a potential target for improvement in health care expenditure and resource allocation
Impact of Sex and Gender on Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study From the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network
Objective: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of 5 interconnected factors, is the main contributor to cardiovascular disease. Although sex- and gender-related elements have been linked to MetS and its components, this association has not been explored among Canadians with or without MetS. In this study, we aimed to identify sex and gender differences in characteristics of MetS in the Canadian population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) database. The CPCSSN contains de-identified electronic health records of >1.5 million Canadians (2010-2019). Individuals 35 to 75 years of age who had a primary care encounter formed the study sample (N=37,813). Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios for sex and gender differences among Canadians with and without MetS, which was the primary outcome variable. Results: The estimated prevalence of MetS was 41.9%. The risk of developing MetS was significantly lower among females compared with males (odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.76). However, the risk was higher in females who used antidepressants (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 1.65). An equal distribution of deprivation indexes was observed between males and females with MetS, with risk slightly higher for those with material deprivation. Females were found to be the most socially deprived. Conclusions: This study provides important sex- and gender-specific differences in MetS among Canadians. Targeting sex- and gender-specific risk factors could assist in reversing the trend of adverse cardiovascular outcomes associated with MetS
Sex and Gender Determinants of Vascular Disease in the Global Context
: Globally, vascular diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Many of the most significant risk factors for vascular disease have a gendered dimension, and sex differences in vascular diseases incidence are apparent, worldwide. In this narrative review, we provide a contemporary picture of sex- and gender-related determinants of vascular disease. We illustrate key factors underlying sex-specific risk stratification, consider similarities and sex differences in vascular disease risk and outcomes with comparisons of data from the global North (ie, developed high-income countries in the Northern hemisphere and Australia) and the global South (ie, regions outside Europe and North America), and explore the relationship between country-level gendered inequities in vascular disease risk and the United Nation's gender inequality index. Review findings suggest that the rising incidence of vascular disease in women is partly explained by an increase in the prevalence of traditional risk factors linked to gender-related determinants such as shifting roles and relations related to the double burden of employment and caregiving responsibilities, lower educational attainment, lower socioeconomic status, and higher psychosocial stress. Social isolation partly explained the higher incidence of vascular disease in men. These patterns were apparent across the global North and South. Study findings emphasize the necessity of taking into account sex differences and gender-related factors in the determination of the vascular disease risk profiles and management strategies. As we move toward the era of precision medicine, future research is needed that identifies, validates, and measures gender-related determinants and risk factors in the global South
Sex and Gender Influence on Cardiovascular Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Findings from Ghana, Gambia, Mali, Guinea, and Botswana
BACKGROUND: There is an upsurge of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Irrespective of biological sex, gender-related factors could be the precursor of these conditions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between biological sex, gender-related variables, and cardiovascular health (CVH) risk factors in SSA countries. METHODS: We used data from the STEPwise approach to surveillance of risk factors for non-communicable disease survey, conducted in adults from Ghana, Gambia, Mali, Guinea, and Botswana. The main outcome was CVH, measured through the health index with values ranging from 0 (worst) to 5 (best or ideal) CVH. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to determine the gender-related factors related to poorer CVH (index less than 4). RESULTS: Data included 15,356 adults (61.4% females, mean age 36.9 years). The prevalence of hypertension (21.6% vs. 13.8%) and overweight/obesity (48.3% vs. 27.5%) was higher among females as compared to males. Females were more likely to be unemployed (17.3% vs. 9.7%) or reported unpaid work (36.8% vs. 15.2%). Overall, females showed worse CVH than males (OR(female) = 0.95, 95% CI:0.91–0.99). Being married was associated with better CVH compared with being single, more so for males (OR(male) = 1.09, 95% CI:0.96–1.24, p(interaction) < 0.01). Males with unpaid work (OR(male) = 1.28, 95% CI:1.12–1.47) had better CVH than their unpaid female counterparts (OR(female) = 1.08, 95% CI:1.01–1.17). CONCLUSION: In SSA populations, being female was associated with poorer CVH given the disproportionate burden of hypertension and overweight/obesity. Gender-related factors such as marital status and unpaid work were associated with better CVH in males compared to females
Impact of biological sex and genderrelated factors on public engagement in protective health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic : cross-sectional analyses from a global survey
Given the main objective of this study was to examine whether sex and gender-related factors were associated with the public’s adherence to COVID-19-recommended protective health behaviours. Design This was a retrospective analysis of the survey that captured data on people’s awareness, attitudes and behaviours as they relate to the COVID-19 policies. Setting Data from the International COVID-19 Awareness and Responses Evaluation survey collected between March 2020 and February 2021 from 175 countries. Participants Convenience sample around the world.Fil: Dev, Rubee. University of Alberta; Canada.Fil: Raparelli, Valeria. University of Alberta; Canada.Fil: Raparelli, Valeria. University of Ferrara; Italy.Fil: Bacon, Simon L. Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre; Canada.Fil: Bacon, Simon L. Concordia University; Canada.Fil: Lavoie, Kim L. Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre; Canada.Fil: Lavoie, Kim L. Université du Québec à Montréal; Canada.Fil: Pilote, Louise. McGill University; Canada.Fil: Norris, Colleen M. University of Alberta; Canada.Fil: Losada, Analía Verónica. Universidad de Flores; Argentina
Sex, Gender, and Stroke Recovery: Functional Limitations and Inpatient Care Needs in Canadian and European Survivors
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability among survivors. Past literature already investigated the biological sex differences in stroke outcome, still limited work on gender differences is published. Therefore, the study aimed at investigating whether biological sex and sociocultural gender of survivors play a role as determinants of disability and quality of life among stroke survivors across Europe and Canada. Methods: Data were gathered from the European Health Information Survey (EHIS, n=316,333) and Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS, n=127,462) datasets. Main outcomes of interest were disability, assessed through evaluating the impairment of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), and inpatient care needs, such as hospitalization or institutionalization. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to identify factors independently associated with outcomes. Federated analysis was conducted for cross-country comparisons. Data were adjusted for the country-specific Gender Inequality Index (GII), with higher score corresponding to more gender inequality towards femalesResults: Female survivors showed greater impairments in iADL (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.53 - 1.96) and ADL (OR=1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44), without a corresponding increase in inpatient care needs. Socioeconomic factors such as marital status and income level were significant predictors of disability, with low income and being single/divorced associated with higher risks. The impact of sex was more pronounced in countries with higher GII, indicating the influence of gender inequality on stroke outcomes. Interpretation: The findings highlight the significant impact of biological sex and gender-related social determinants on post-stroke disability, with female sex and unfavorable socioeconomic conditions being associated with worse outcomes
Impact of biological sex and gender-related factors on public engagement in protective health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analyses from a global survey
OBJECTIVE: Given the role of sociocultural gender in shaping human behaviours, the main objective of this study was to examine whether sex and gender-related factors were associated with the public’s adherence to COVID-19-recommended protective health behaviours. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of the survey that captured data on people’s awareness, attitudes and behaviours as they relate to the COVID-19 policies. SETTING: Data from the International COVID-19 Awareness and Responses Evaluation survey collected between March 2020 and February 2021 from 175 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample around the world. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We examined the role of sex and gender-related factors in relation to non-adherence of protective health behaviours including: (1) hand washing; (2) mask wearing; and (3) physical distancing. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine the factors associated with non-adherence to behaviours. RESULTS: Among 48 668 respondents (mean age: 43 years; 71% female), 98.3% adopted hand washing, 68.5% mask wearing and 76.9% physical distancing. Compared with males, females were more likely to adopt hand washing (OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.71 to 2.28) and maintain physical distancing (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.34). However, in multivariable sex-stratified models, females in countries with higher Gender Inequality Indexes (GII) were less likely to report hand washing (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.47, 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.05). Females who reported being employed (aOR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.48) and in countries with low/medium GIIs (aOR=0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.51) were less likely to report mask wearing. Females who reported being employed were less likely to report physical distancing (aOR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.49). CONCLUSION: While females showed greater adherence to COVID-19 protective health behaviours, gender-related factors, including employment status and high country-wide gender inequality, were independently associated with non-adherence. These findings may inform public health and vaccination policies in current as well as future pandemics
- …
