1,720,967 research outputs found
Government of Indonesia?s Battling Strategy to Cope With Pseudo-Cooperatives
No full textBy contesting the political spectrum versus the economic side of regulation, it is found that the Indonesian cooperative's performance is influenced more by the first approach. As Golkar's electoral vehicle to protect its ruling party's majority vote, the cooperative apex organization (Dekopin) became a parastatal. As a 'bureaucratic capitalist' with state budget support, Dekopin's 'holdup problem' creates the 'subsidy mentality' and increasing corruption perception that stimulated the formation of pseudo-cooperatives. A bottom-up petition to remove Dekopin's parastatal status failed. By calibrating the 2012-2014 panel data, the pseudo-cooperatives decrease when active cooperatives increase. From the 2015 cross-section exercise, pseudo-cooperatives' number rises along with the growing population. External funding to cooperatives is used as a means to spend it on leisure. Many islands show different tendencies of pseudo-cooperatives' creation. In 2016, a government's economic strategy to create healthy cooperatives was started by closing down 32,778 pseudo-cooperatives. This process continued until 2019
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Chapter IV. Interregional Development Cooperation in Indonesia
No full text/711.3/L11application/pdfASE002700_006boo
KOMPARASI IMPLEMENTASI EKONOMI KERAKYATAN DI SEKTOR KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN
Full text linkMakalah ini memuat evaluasi tentang implementasi berbagai kebijakan ekonomi kerakyatan di sektor kelautan dan perikanan di Indonesia, sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh TAP MPR Nomor XVI/MPR/1998. Meski tidak terdukung oleh ketersediaan data dan bersifat sangat umum, pencapaian ekonomi kerakyatan dalam sektor kelautan dan perikanan dapat diukur dan dirinci menurut analisis kurun waktu dengan penggunaan logika, pola dan metode perhitungan yang sama. Dalam penelitian ini, pengukuran pencapaian tersebut dilakukan dengan pendekatan keunggulan komparatif dari tren data pada setiap periode kebijakan menteri. Ada empat skenario evaluasi ekonomi kerakyatan yang diamati, yang diturunkan dari ketentuan TAP MPR tersebut di atas: (i) Skenario A, yang berorientasi pada masyarakat paling bawah dan koperasi melalui pendekatan nilai tukar nelayan dan jumlah ikan yang dijual di Tempat Pelelangan Ikan; (ii) Skenario B, yaitu skenario A yang ditambah dengan elemen perusahaan dalam negeri dan perusahaan lainnya; (iii) Skenario C, yaitu Skenario B yang ditambah dengan komparasi perusahaan asing; (iv) Skenario D, yaitu Skenario C yang ditambah dengan elemen ekspor impor. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa setiap skenario memiliki periode terbaiknya. Skenario A terbaik adalah terjadi pada periode kebijakan tahun 2011-2014. Skenario B dan C terbaik adalah terjadi pada periode kebijakan tahun 2014-2019. Sementara itu, Skenario D terbaik adalah terjadi pada periode kebijakan 2011-2014. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa apabila didukung ketersediaan data, pendekatan ini dapat direplikasi untuk terlaksananya implementasi ekonomi kerakyatan yang lebih baik di Indonesia. Tittle: Comparative Implementation of People’s Economy in the Marine and Fisheries SectorThis paper reports a bottom-up comparative evaluation of policy implementation on people’s economy in Indonesia as regulated in TAP MPR Number XVI/ MPR /1998. Albeit lack of data, this experiment shows that the achievement of people’s economy’s can be detailed in marine and fishery sector by using similiar time series analysis with the same logic and methodology. The trend’s comparative advantage of statistical data for each ministerial period is calculated. There are four scenarios to achieve multi-goals: (i) The A Scenario, the pro-poor implementation orientation is calculated using the exercise of exchange rate of fishers and the number of fish sold at the Fish Auction Center; (ii) The B Scenario, which is Scenario A added by elements of domestic companies and other companies; (iii) The C Scenario, which is the sum of the B scenario by including the comparison of foreign companies; (iv)The D Scenario, which is the C Scenario plus export and import activities. Each scenario has its best period. The best A scenario was in the 2011-2014 period. The best B and C scenarios were between 2014-2019, and the best D scenario was in the 2011-2014 period. The implication of this research is that if supported by the availability of data, this approach can be replicated for a better implementation of the people’s economy in Indonesia.
Advocacy Coalition Framework of Ultra Micro Loan Policymaking in Indonesia
Full text linkAdvocating the Ultra Micro-lending concept of Indonesia's Ministry of Finance in 2017 was a tumultuous nine-year process. The present paper aims to examine the Ultra Micro-lending (UMi) program conducted by the Ministry of Finance of Republic of Indonesia using Advocacy Coalition Framework. This paper showed that Advocacy Coalition Framework could moderate the interest groups' disagreement through seven steps as follows. First, relatively stable parameters of poverty need alleviation using better financial access with empowerment. Second, the external system is inspired by Grameen Bank as the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. Third, removing constraints and resources of subsystem actors from the internal Ministry of Finance and the Parliaments. Fourth, creating consensus for getting the Ministry of Bureaucratic Reform's permit. Fifth, policy subsystem that coalesces the need of market-rate and subsidized rate to cater to 46.7 million grassroots entrepreneurs as a 'win-win' arrangement to complement the bank-based People's Business Credit (KUR). Sixth, policy outputs as the legal product of the UMi with a 7 Trillion State budget. Seventh, policy impact's measurement after one year piloting before UMi's scaling up. This paper has a significant contribution to enhancing the efficacy of UMi program, and as a continuous effort to ensure the economic development of the country
- …
