1,721,119 research outputs found

    Long-term impact of acromegaly

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 222216.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 06 november 2020Promotores : Hermus, A.R.M.M., Smit, J.W.A. Co-promotor : Netea-Maier, R.T.237 p

    Acromegaly and Cushing's syndrome: life after cure

    Full text link
    Contains fulltext : 157680.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)RU Radboud Universiteit, 30 juni 2016Promotores : Hermus, A.R.M.M., Smit, J.W.A. Co-promotor : Netea-Maier, R.T

    The complex interplay between the immune system and thyroid function: translational studies in health and thyroid cancer

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 220343.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 25 september 2020Promotores : Smit, J.W.A., Netea, M.G. Co-promotor : Netea-Maier, R.T

    Towards an optimal TSH: different goals for different outcomes and for different populations?

    Full text link
    Contains fulltext : 150187.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 27 januari 2016Promotores : Heijer, M. den, Hermus, A.R.M.M. Co-promotor : Netea-Maier, R.T

    Long-term impact of acromegaly

    No full text

    Long term impact of endocrine tumors

    No full text

    Blood pressure measurement: we should all do it better!

    Full text link
    Contains fulltext : 57486.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore