1,723,917 research outputs found
Book review: Brandeis and America. Edited by Nelson L. Dawson.
Full text linkBook review: Brandeis and America. Edited by Nelson L. Dawson. Lexington, Ky: University Press of Kentucky. 1989.
Pp. 163. Reviewed by: Thomas K. McCraw.McCraw, Thomas K.. (1990). Book review: Brandeis and America. Edited by Nelson L. Dawson.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/165788
Study of phase transitions by means of nuclear magnetic resonance phenomena
Full text link"July 31, 1948." "Condensation of a thesis."Includes bibliographical references.Army Signal Corps No. W-36-039 sc-32037.Nelson L. Alpert
Nelson L., Seager J. (dir) A Companion to feminist geography
No full textClout Hugh. Nelson L., Seager J. (dir) A Companion to feminist geography. In: Annales de Géographie, t. 115, n°649, 2006. Wilderness. La nature en amérique du nord, sous la direction de Paul Arnould et Éric Glon. pp. 330-331
Haggerson, Nelson L., Jr., Expanding Curriculum Research and Understanding: A Mytho-Poetic Perspective. New York: Peter Lang, 2000.
No full textPresents 16 essays by the author spanning the years 1982-2000 related to the topic; the introduction and chapter 16 give autobiographical information about the author
Nelson L., Seager J. (dir) A Companion to feminist geography
No full textClout Hugh. Nelson L., Seager J. (dir) A Companion to feminist geography. In: Annales de Géographie, t. 115, n°649, 2006. Wilderness. La nature en amérique du nord, sous la direction de Paul Arnould et Éric Glon. pp. 330-331
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
