635 research outputs found
Bourdieu y Luhmann: Diferencias, similitudes, sinergias
No full textA compilation of articles edited by Nassehi and Nollmann (2004) and a paper published by Pokol (2002) inaugurate a discussion about similarities in the theories of Pierre Bourdieu and Niklas Luhmann in spite of the fact that the differences are more likely visible. This paper unifies the discussion which until now has been developed from various authors independently and introduces the arguments in the Spanish speaking academic sphere. readopting and accentuating the comparative idea, this text defends that using simultaneously, previously justified, the theories of Bourdieu and Luhmann is an interesting possibility of epistemological synthesis. developing a systematic comparison of similarities and differences in core concepts from each author, their relation with classical and contemporary sociological theory, their epistemological axioms, views on agency/structure and subjacent ethics, the paper finally summarizes the synergetic effects which a perspective based on both theoretical sources offers for social investigation.Una compilación de artículos editada por Nassehi y Nollmann (2004) y un texto de Pokol (2002) inauguran una discusión sobre las similitudes entre las teorías de Pierre Bourdieu y Niklas Luhmann a pesar de su aparente discrepancia. el presente artículo aglutina el debate sobre la cuestión que hasta el momento ha sido desarrollada aisladamente por varios autores y la introduce en el ámbito académico hispanohablante. retomando y profundizando en la idea comparativa, el artículo argumenta que el uso en paralelo, previamente justificado, de las teorías de Bourdieu y Luhmann supone una posibilidad interesante de síntesis epistemológica. Se desarrolla una comparación sistemática de similitudes y diferencias de los conceptos clave de ambos autores, sus relaciones con la teoría sociológica clásica y contemporánea, sus axiomas epistémicos, visiones sobre agente/estructura y éticas subyacentes, para finalmente concluir en las sinergias que sugieren para la investigación social una mirada teórica que se nutre de ambas fuentes
¿Contingencia o justicia trascendental: Luhmann o Höffe?
No full textThe author presents the central arguments developed by both Höffe and Luhmann regarding
the foundations of an institutional normative order to ensure political and non-metaphysical justice.
Thus, presents the contributions of both philosophers; in the first section, he explains the Luhmanian
ethics, and afterwards describes the criticism of Höffe to Luhmannian positivism. Finally, the author
highlights the contributions of Luhmann and Höffe and statuses them as the most important ideas in
recent decades in philosophy of German lawEl autor expone los argumentos centrales desarrollados tanto por Höffe como por
Luhmann respecto de los fundamentos de un orden normativo institucional que garanticen
una justicia política y no-metafísica. Así, presenta las contribuciones de ambos pensadores;
explica -en la primera sección- la ética luhmaniana, y más adelante describe la crítica de
Höffe al positivismo luhmanniano. Finalmente, el autor rescata las contribuciones de
Luhmann y Höffe y las ubica como las más relevantes de las últimas décadas en materia de
filosofía del derecho alemán
Del primer al segundo Niklas Luhmann: las consecuencias del giro autopoiético
No full text82 páginasLa presente tesis nace la idea de continuidad y perfeccionamiento en el pensamiento de Niklas Luhmann. En vez de explicar el paso de una primera etapa, previa al giro autopoiético, a otra posterior a dicho giro, como un salto producido por el descubrimiento de conceptos como autopoiesis, se intenta demostrar que ya el primer Luhmann tienen nociones asimilables a los desarrollos conceptuales que logra el segundo Luhmann, a pesar del cambio en su punto de partida. De esta manera, se pretende trazar puentes entre la primera y la segunda etapa del autor para facilitar la comprensión de esta última, teniendo en cuenta que el primer Luhmann, al todavía utilizar conceptos cercanos a la sociología tradicional, resulta de más fácil lectura que el segundo Luhmann.This thesis is conceived with the idea of continuity and refinement in the ideas of Niklas Luhmann. lnstead of explaining the transition from one phase, preceding the "autopoietic turn", to another following this turn, as a leap produced by the development of concepts as autopoiesis, it aims to demonstrate that the first Luhmann has notions similar to the concepts achieved by the second Luhmann, despite his shift in his starting point. In this sense, it aims to create bridges between the first and the second phase of the author to ease the comprehension of the later phase, taking into account that the first Luhmann, by using concepts more akin to traditional sociology, is easier to read than the second Luhmann.PregradoAbogado(a
Contingency or trascendental justice : Luhmann or Höffe
No full textResumen: El autor expone los argumentos centrales desarrollados tanto por Höffe como por Luhmann respecto de los fundamentos de un orden normativo institucional que garanticen una justicia política y no-metafísica. Así, presenta las contribuciones de ambos pensadores; explica -en la primera sección- la ética luhmaniana, y más adelante describe la crítica de Höffe al positivismo luhmanniano. Finalmente, el autor rescata las contribuciones de Luhmann y Höffe y las ubica como las más relevantes de las últimas décadas en materia de filosofía del derecho alemán.Abstract: The author presents the central arguments developed by both Höffe and Luhmann regarding the foundations of an institutional normative order to ensure political and non-metaphysical justice. Thus, presents the contributions of both philosophers; in the first section, he explains the Luhmanian ethics, and afterwards describes the criticism of Höffe to Luhmannian positivism. Finally, the author highlights the contributions of Luhmann and Höffe and statuses them as the most important ideas in recent decades in philosophy of German law
Contingency or trascendental justice : Luhmann or Höffe
No full textResumen: El autor expone los argumentos centrales desarrollados tanto por Höffe como por Luhmann respecto de los fundamentos de un orden normativo institucional que garanticen una justicia política y no-metafísica. Así, presenta las contribuciones de ambos pensadores; explica -en la primera sección- la ética luhmaniana, y más adelante describe la crítica de Höffe al positivismo luhmanniano. Finalmente, el autor rescata las contribuciones de Luhmann y Höffe y las ubica como las más relevantes de las últimas décadas en materia de filosofía del derecho alemán.Abstract: The author presents the central arguments developed by both Höffe and Luhmann regarding the foundations of an institutional normative order to ensure political and non-metaphysical justice. Thus, presents the contributions of both philosophers; in the first section, he explains the Luhmanian ethics, and afterwards describes the criticism of Höffe to Luhmannian positivism. Finally, the author highlights the contributions of Luhmann and Höffe and statuses them as the most important ideas in recent decades in philosophy of German law
Theorizing culture, or reading Luhmann against Luhmann
No full textThis article tries to counter Niklas Luhmann's outspoken theoretical scepticism about the notion of culture. In the first part, it is argued that Luhmann devised at least three culture-related concepts: memory, semantics or semantic structures, and knowledge. After a short presentation of Luhmann's explicit considerations on the notion of culture, these conceptual equivalents are briefly clarified and discussed. In the second section, the interrelationships between Luhmann's culture-related notions are analyzed. More particularly, it is shown that they all point to the double process of condensation and confirmation of meaning or Sinn (in the phenomenological sense). Within communicative or social systems, this process explains the unintended production of what Luhmann terms meaning kernels, symbolic generalizations, schemes or identities. As Luhmann himself admits, communication cannot do without symbolic generalizations or meaning-identities. This necessitates a re-evaluation of the notion of culture from a systems theoretical point of view. The closing section offers a first step in this direction. It is argued that condensed and therefore typified forms or meaning-identities can be regarded as the elements of culture considered as a medium. According to this view, culture is a more specific articulation of the overall medium of meaning or Sinn and has a temporal, factual and social dimension. The primary function of the medium of culture is to ensure the structural coupling between social and psychic systems. Social systems therefore presuppose that condensed forms, or cultural elements, are always already known by all participating psychic systems. In order to underline this assumptive nature, the author proposes the notion of operative fiction.status: Publishe
Art as a Social System
No full textThrough an interdisciplinary approach, Luhmann clarifies the context and contingency of art while elaborating his theory of society. Returning to 18th century aesthetics, the author argues that art is communication that uses perception instead of language. Maintaining that perception and communication are incommensurable, he nonetheless claims that art operates in the boundary between the social system and consciousness, profoundly irritating communication while remaining internal to the social. Circa 860 bibl. ref. Index 20 p
Luhmann, Jakobs y el derecho penal del enemigo
No full textEl autor retoma el tema del Derecho penal del enemigo a partir de los postulados de Günther Jakobs y Niklas Luhmann, abordando diversos conceptos de la teoría de los sistemas sociales, para llegar al funcionalismo penal y de esa manera hacer una crítica a la postura de Jakobs respecto del Derecho penal del enemigo.O autor retoma o tema do Direito penal do inimigo a partir dos postulados de Günther Jakobs e Niklas Luhmann, abordando diversos conceitos da teoria dos sistemas sociais, para che- gar ao funcionalismo penal e dessa maneira fazer uma crítica à postura de Jakobs respeito do Direito penal do inimigo.The author takes up again the topic of the Criminal law of the enemy starting from postulates of Günther Jakobs and Niklas Luhmann, dealing with several concepts of the social systems theory, to arrive at the penal funcionalism and that way to do a critic to the posture of Jakobs with regard to the Criminal law of the enemy
Autopoiesis, la unidad de una diferencia: Luhmann y Maturana Autopoiesis, the unity of a difference: Luhmann and Maturana
No full textEl artículo ofrece una reseña de la fructífera relación teórica entre Niklas Luhmann y Humberto Maturana. La teoría luhmanniana es un edificio conceptual cuyas dimensiones abarcan la comprensión de todo lo social. Pese al fallecimiento del autor en 1998, todavía hoy se continúan publicando escritos póstumos y la influencia de su pensamiento se extiende paulatinamente a diversos ámbitos de las ciencias sociales. Parte central de este complejo pensamiento se desarrolla con la ayuda de conceptos que Luhmann adaptó de la biología de Humberto Maturana. En este trabajo se explica el modo de esta vinculación y los alcances que tiene para la comprensión de la sociedad globalizada moderna.The article presents a synopsis of the fruitful relationship between Niklas Luhmann and Humberto Maturana. The Luhmannian theory is a conceptual structure whose dimensions include the understanding of the social as a whole. Notwithstanding the passing of the author in 1998, his posthumous writings are still being published and the influence of his thinking is gradually extended to several domains within social sciences. A core part of that complex thinking was developed with the benefit of concepts that Luhmann adapted from Humberto Maturana's biology. This study explains the workings of such tie and its reach for understanding modern globalized society
- …
