1,721,034 research outputs found

    Transcriptional Wiring of Cell Wall-Related Genes in Arabidopsis

    No full text
    Transcriptional coordination, or co-expression, of genes may signify functional relatedness of the corresponding proteins. For example, several genes involved in secondary cell wall cellulose biosynthesis are co-expressed with genes engaged in the synthesis of xylan, which is a major component of the secondary cell wall. To extend these types of analyses, we investigated the co-expression relationships of all Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes (CAZy)-related genes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Thus, the intention was to transcriptionally link different cell wall-related processes to each other, and also to other biological functions. To facilitate easy manual inspection, we have displayed these interactions as networks and matrices, and created a web-based interface (http://aranet.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/corecarb) containing downloadable files for all the transcriptional associations

    In-vitro characterization of promiscuous biotinylation by biotin ligase

    No full text
    Protein-protein interaction networks represent useful system to better understand the organisation of the proteome and, moreover, provide a support for identifying protein functions. Thus, identification of these interactions would help to reach an improved comprehension of the entire cell. Most popular methods for detecting protein interactions are either in vitro assays or are based on heterologous systems, both of which do not represent true cellular environment. Thus, a lot of research is directed towards development of new methods that detect interactions under in vivo conditions, so as to preserve the spatio-temporal integrity of these interactions. One of such methods involve the biotin protein ligase (BirA) from Escherichia coli, which is responsible for catalysing transfer of a small molecule, biotin, to a specific lysine residue (within a specific conserved sequence) of acceptor proteins. This reaction is highly specific, with only one protein in E.coli capable of being biotinylated in vivo. A mutation in BirA (R118G; BirA*), however, reduces this specificity such that the intermediate of reaction (biotinoyl-AMP) is released from the active site of the protein and can biotinylate any protein that it encounters. Based on this principle, if we fuse a protein with BirA*, the proteins that come in proximity of the fusion construct should be biotinylated and could further be identified by a streptavidin pull-down. In order to develop this technique in plants, the enzymatic properties of BirA* need to be characterized. The current project was focused on purifying BirA* (codon optimized for expression in Arabidopsis thaliana) from bacteria and assessing its enzymatic properties under different physiological conditions. To this end, GST-6X Histidine fused BirA* was purified using inducible bacterial overexpression system and checked for promiscuous biotinylation of non-native target, i,e., free GST protein. Further, the substrate concentration, temperature, reaction time and pH conditions for the progress of reaction were optimised. The results generated by the current study verify that BirA* can catalyse promiscuous biotinylation, therefore it would be worthwhile to extend this system in plants for detection of protein-protein interactions. Moreover, if BirA* is selectively overexpressed in a specific cellular compartment, it has potential to biotinylate most of the proteins within this compartment. As different cellular compartments differ in pH, the present study also helped to short-list the compartments whose proteome could be deciphered using BirA*. To summarize, the present study verified that BirA* based proximity-biotinylation technique could be used to develop an in vivo assay for detecting protein interactions and to decipher organellar proteome. Also, we were able to optimize the reaction conditions at which the enzyme is most active

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Integrative Ansätze zur Analyse von Koexpressionsnetzwerken in Pflanzen

    No full text
    It is well documented that transcriptionally coordinated genes tend to be functionally related, and that such relationships may be conserved across different species, and even kingdoms. (Ihmels et al., 2004). Such relationships was initially utilized to reveal functional gene modules in yeast and mammals (Ihmels et al., 2004), and to explore orthologous gene functions between different species and kingdoms (Stuart et al., 2003; Bergmann et al., 2004). Model organisms, such as Arabidopsis, are readily used in basic research due to resource availability and relative speed of data acquisition. A major goal is to transfer the acquired knowledge from these model organisms to species that are of greater importance to our society. However, due to large gene families in plants, the identification of functional equivalents of well characterized Arabidopsis genes in other plants is a non-trivial task, which often returns erroneous or inconclusive results. In this thesis, concepts of utilizing co-expression networks to help infer (i) gene function, (ii) organization of biological processes and (iii) knowledge transfer between species are introduced. An often overlooked fact by bioinformaticians is that a bioinformatic method is as useful as its accessibility. Therefore, majority of the work presented in this thesis was directed on developing freely available, user-friendly web-tools accessible for any biologist.Es ist bereits ausgiebig gezeigt worden, dass Gene, deren Expression auf Transkriptionsebene koordiniert ist, häufig auch funktional in verwandten Stoffwechselwegen vorkommen, und dass sich dies wahrscheinlich auch Spezies- und sogar Reichübergreifend sagen lässt (Ihmels et al., 2004). Anfänglich wurden solche Beziehungen verwendet, um sogenannte Genfunktionsmodule in Hefe und Säugern aufzudecken (Ihmels et al., 2004), um dann orthologe Genfunktionen zwischen verschiedene Spezies und Reichen zu entdecken (Stuart et al., 2003; Bergmann et al., 2004). Modellorganismen wie Arabidopsis werden bevorzugt in der Forschung verwendet, weil man durch die schnelle Generationszeit in kurzer Zeit viele Daten erheben kann und aufgrund dessen die Ressourcen- und Informationsvielfalt um ein Vielfaches größer ist. Ein Hauptziel ist der Wissenstransfer von Modellorganismen auf Spezies, die gesellschaftlich von höherer Bedeutung sind wie z.B. Getreidearten oder andere Feldfrüchte. Pflanzen besitzen oft große Genfamilien und die eindeutige Identifizierung von gut charakterisierten Arabidopsisorthologen in besagten Nutzpflanzen ist kein triviales Vorhaben. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden Konzepte zur Nutzung von Co-expressionsnetzwerken beschrieben, die helfen sollen (i) Genfunktionen zu identifizieren, (ii) die Organisation von biologischen Prozessen aufzuklären und (iii) das erworbene Wissen auf andere Spezies übertragbar zu machen. Ein häufig von Bioinformatikern übersehender Umstand ist, dass bioinformatische Methoden nur so sinnvoll sind wie ihre Zugänglichkeit. Deshalb basiert der Großteil dieser Arbeit auf freiverfügbaren und vor allem für Biologen nutzerfreundlichen Webtools

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore