1,720,960 research outputs found

    Reinterpretasi Makna Jihad Dan Teroris

    Full text link
    This paper aims to find a very clear distinction between jihad and terrorism. The concept of jihad is often regarded as the source of the proliferation of terrorism because of misunderstanding in understanding religion. The very hard thought of religion or radicalism with certain genes can has increasingly strong role for the growth of extremism, terrorism which finally will act of terror on the pretext of jihad fi sabilillah. The situation and the opportunity was used by the enemy to continue claimed that “Islam is terrorism”. The data presented in this paper is sourced from some literatures. The results of this paper, that jihad is the real struggle whether with the soul, materials, verbal acts and thoughts in order to up hold the religion and Islamic values peacefully. Instead of terrorists is an act of terrorizing, threatening, frightening the masses with certain motives and goals

    Islam dan Pluralisme Dalam Pembangunan Politik di Indonesia (Perspektif Pemikiran Abdurrahman Wahid)

    No full text
    This paper aims to explore the thoughts of Abdurrahman Wahid about Islam and plurarism in political development in Indonesia, referring to the condition of the Indonesian nation that is difficult to live amid a climate of religious plurality, then he voiced the call for peaceful coexistence in the social life of religious communities in Indonesia. For Abdurrahman, with his keen thoughts on religion and nationalism, he directed his thoughts on inclusiveness in religious life. This paper is presented in the literature review. The results can be drawn from this paper, that the plurarism according to Gus Dur, namely the existence of awareness to know each other and dialogue sincerely so that one group with each other take and give. Islam as the majority religion in Indonesia, continued Gus Dur, has important values in creating harmony among peoples and achieve political stability in Indonesia. This idea can be glimpsed in terms of indigenous Islam, democratic values and human rights, humanitarian principles in the plurality of society, the principle of justice, egalitarian</jats:p

    Urgensi Talak Di Depan Sidang Pengadilan Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah

    Full text link
    This paper aims to find the urgency of the divorce that must be imposed in front of the court as stipulated in article 115 Compilation of Islamic Law based on the review of maslahah mursalah. This was done because there was a controversy about the talak provisions in classical fiqh with the provisions of the divorce contained in the Marriage Law in Indonesia. The data presented in this paper are sourced from the literature. The results of this paper indicate that the review of Maslahah Mursalah against the imposition of divorce which must be done in front of the court is that the divorce has legal certainty for both husband and wife if they are to remarry, in addition to guaranteeing the child's livelihood and living for his wife, and the wife can claim the right to share property without this. In addition, the Religious Court is one of the institutions that can narrow divorce and at the same time can abort talak habits that are arbitrary

    Reconstruction of the Makar and Relevance with the concept of al-Baghyu in the Fikih Jinayah

    No full text
    The 2019 General Election (Pemilu, Indonesia) divided Indonesian society into two sides, namely the #2019GantiPresiden and the #Jokowi2Periode. The situation between the two sides was tense, which could potentially cause a commotion and worsen the public's situation. Supporters of Jokowi's camp describe the #2019GantiPresiden movement as an attempt to commit makar (treason) against the legitimate government, while the government's opposing side describes the accusation of treason as a violation of democratic freedoms. Based on the foregoing, the question arises as to whether going against the government can be considered makar, which is a criminal act. This study is a type of normative research that uses library research to collect data. This study concludes that opposing the government (Oposisi) or criticizing the government is not makar, but rather the right to free expression. Makar as a negative brand image should not exist in a democratic post-reform environment. It should be used sparingly so that there is no arbitrariness that violates human rights. This corresponds to the definition of al-bughah in Islamic criminal law. Pemilihan umum (Pemilu) pada tahun 2019 telah memecahkan masyarakat dengan dua kubu/ dua gerakan, yaitu gerakan #2019GantiPresiden dan gerakan #Jokowi2Periode. Situasi pun mencekam antara kedua belah pihak yang berpotensi mengarah kepada keributan, dan menyebabkan kondisi masyarakat semakin memanas. Pendukung kubu Jokowi menyebut gerakan #2019GantiPresiden merupakan upaya makar terhadap pemerintahan yang sah, sementara kubu diseberang pemerintah (oposisi) menyebut tuduhan makar tersebut merupakan pelanggaran terhadap kebebasan demokrasi. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas timbul pertanyaan apakah bersebrangan dengan pemerintah dapat dikatakan sebagai makar yang merupakan tindak pidana? Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian normatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelusuran kepustakaan (method of library). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa bersebrangan dengan pemerintah (oposisi) atau mengkritik pemerintah belum bisa dimaknai sebagai makar melainkan hak kebebasan berpendapat. Makar sebagai brand image negative tidak sewajarnya muncul dalam suasana berdemokrasi pasca reformasi. Seharusnya makar dimakanai  secara limitative agar tidak ada kesewenang-wenangan yang merugikan hak asasi manusia. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan makna al-bughah dalam hikum pidana Islam.

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore