1,720,963 research outputs found

    Muhammad Nashirudin Al-Bani's Perspective on Takfir Hadith

    Get PDF
    The Wahhabi Salafi group often quotes the opinion of Sheikh Nahsirudin Albani in matters of religious teachings. Meanwhile, Salafi-Wahhabi groups often disapprove of their fellow believers and religions. Of course Syekh Muhammad Nahsirudin Albani was indirectly accused of being the embryo of takfir teachings, while what the author found from Syekh Muhammad Nashirudin Albani's thoughts is that it is not that easy to disbelieve fellow Muslims, so it is interesting to examine more deeply how Muhamman Nashirudin Albani's understanding of the hadiths of Takfir. The research methodology is descriptive qualitative, using a library research approach which is not field research, but works with books and scientific works related to Shaykh Nashirudin Albani. The data analysis technique is collecting data, reading it, analyzing it, then drawing conclusions objectively. The findings show that a person cannot be said to be a disbeliever if he has never clearly stated and is believed by heart that someone is really against the law of Allah SWT, or considers the law of Allah SWT to be irrelevant. As for those who commit big or small sins, as long as they do not openly oppose the law of Allah SWT, they are fasiq and immoral

    Hukum memakai niqab (cadar) menurut Syaikh Muhammad Nashirudin Al-Albani dan Syaikh Muhammad bin Shalih Al-Utsaimin

    Get PDF
    Penelitian ini berawal dari banyaknya pendapat-pendapat tentang Niqab (cadar). Sebagaian Masyarakat ada yang berpendapat bahwa memakai Niqab adalah suatu ibadah yang menjadi keharusan bagi wanita muslim, bahkan sebagai tren semata dan ada sebagaian masyarakat lain yang menganggap bahwa penggunaan niqab merupakan identitas teroris. Pada penelitian ini penulis ingin memaparkan pendapat Muhammad Nashirudin Al-Albani dan Muhammad bin Shalih Al-Utsaimin mengenai hukum memakai niqab. Tujuan penulisan skripsi ini adalah 1) Untuk mengetahui pendapat Syaikh Al-Albani dan Syaikh Al-Utsaimin tentang hukum memakai Niqab, 2) Untuk mengetahui Metode Istinbat Hukum Syaikh Muhammad Nashiruddin Al-Albani dan Syaikh Muhammad bin Shalih Al-Utsaimin mengenai hukum memakai Niqab, 3) Untuk mengetahui persamaan dan perbedaan pendapat Syaikh Al-Albani dan Syaikh Al-Utsaimin tentang hukum memakai Niqab. Dalam menjawab permasalahan ini, penelitian yang dilakukan berdasarkan kepustakaan dengan menggunakan metode penyajian secara deskriptif analisis, dengan studi komparatif. Pengumpulan data yang digunakan meliputi data primer yaitu kitab Risalatul Hijab dan kitab jilbab Al-mar’ah muslimah fi kitabi as-Sunnah, serta data sekunder yang berasal dari buku-buku sebagai penunjang pnelitian. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan 1) Bahwa Syaikh Al-Albani menyatakan bahwa wanita wajib menutup seluruh tubuhnya dan tidak boleh menampakkan sedikit perhiasannya, kecuali wajah dan telapak tangan, Dan dalam masalah menutup wajah bagi wanita muslim untuk menjaga dirinya adalah perkara sunnah dan mustahab, sedangkan Syaikh Al-Utsaimin secara tegas mewajibkan wanita menutup wajah karena makna jilbab adalah menutup seluruh tubuh,. 2) Metode istinbath hukum yang ditempuh oleh Syaikh Al-Albani dalam menentukan hukum memakai niqab yaitu menggunakan metode tekstual dan kontekstual terlihat dari cara pemahaman beliau dengan memberi argumentasinya ketika istri-istri sahabat dan Nabi juga mengenakan niqab ditambah dengan pernyataaanya dalam memberikan bantahan terhadap mereka yang menyatakan bahwa memakai niqab itu bida’ah, sedangkan metode istinbath hukum Syaikh AL-Utsaimin yaitu saddu dariah, karena wajah merupakan sumber fitnah maka wajib ditutup. 3) Kedua Ulama ini memiliki Perbedaan yang terletak pada pendapat mereka dalam menghukumi penggunaan niqab. Yang kedunya memiliki hujjah dalam memberikan hukum dalam masalah niqab itu sendiri. Persamaan antara Syaikh Al-Albani dan Syaikh Al-Utsaimin adalah keduanya sependapat pada pemberian makna atau defenisi tentang jilbab dan khimar

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore