4 research outputs found
عدالة الصحابة ومصادرية تفسيرهم: دراسة نقدية لشبهات الحداثية وأثرها على أصول الاستدلال: The integrity of the Prophet's Companions and their sources in interpreting the Qur'an: A Critical Study of Modernist Misconceptions and their impact on the principles of argumentation
No full textAbstract
Many verses in which Allah praises the Prophet's Companions affirm their high status and position in Islam, considering them sources for interpreting the Quran and its sciences. Their application of the teachings of the Noble Quran was instrumental in building an Islamic civilization with a significant scientific impact on Islamic history. This study sought to cover the integrity of the Prophet's Companions (PBUH) and their primary sources in interpreting the Qur'an, and to analyze and critique the impact of Modernist Misconceptions about the Companions' interpretations of the Quran. The researcher employed an inductive methodology, examining and analyzing literature pertinent to the subject and sources associated with Tafsir (Quranic interpretation). One of the conclusions is that Allah and His Messenger's commendation of the Prophet's Companions in the Quran and Sunnah attests to their integrity. Considering the Companions to be the best people after the Prophet. Righteous predecessors unanimously agreed that any transgression against them is an offence against the core principles of Islam. Modernism is regarded as a deviant intellectual and rational tendency that aims to cause people to question the sources of the Quranic interpretation and undermine confidence in Shaba’s (Companions) Tafsir. It also attempts to interpret the Qur'an with reason and logic without adhering to the established principles of the righteous predecessors. The most prominent modernist criticisms of the Companions' Tafsir came from an attempt to cast doubt on the sources of their interpretation, a call to adopt independent opinions other than the Companions', their failure to transmit the interpretation accurately, and insulting the integrity of the great Qur'anic interpreters among the Companions, accusing them of being influenced by the fictional narratives of the People of the Book. It has been demonstrated that the main effects of modernist doubts on the sources of the Companions' interpretation include undermining trust in the Companions' Tafsir, weakening the accepted sources and principles of Qur'anic interpretation, attempting to abolish methodological controls in proving facts, opening the field of Qur'anic interpretation with an independent opinion. The study also showed that the Companions' integrity does not imply that they were perfect or blameless; they may have made mistakes. Instead, their integrity indicates that they did not purposefully fabricate information about the Prophet or in their testimony or transmission. Their lack of infallibility does not necessarily mean that their integrity was compromised. The best strategy for criticizing modernist opponents, it is to focus on demonstrating the consensus of Islamic scholars on the integrity of the Companions of the Prophet, as well as what is explicitly stated in the texts. It's also critical to demonstrate the fallacies of their ideas and deviations, as well as their genuine motivations in their plot to discredit religious sources and authorities by disseminating doubts and misconceptions
AKAD NIKAH TANPA WALI (STUDI KOMPARATIF IJTIHAD HUKUM SYEKH ZAINUDDIN AL-MALIBARI DAN IBNU MAUDUD ALMAUSILY)
No full textThe marriage contract without a guardian has become
controversial among ulama, especially because the Hanafi School
allows marriage without a guardian, which is different from the other
three schools of thought. For this reason, the author compares the two
views of scholars from the Syafi'iyah and Hanafiyah schools through
their respective books, namely "Fath Mu'in" by Sheikh Zainuddin al-
Malibari (Syafi'iyah) and "Al -Ikhtiyar Li al-Ta'lil al-Mukhtar" by Ibn
Maudud (Hanafiyah). The aim of this research is: First, to understand
the views of Sheikh Zainuddin al-Malibari regarding guardians in
marriage contracts and legal ijtihad in "Fath Mu'in". Second, knowing
Ibn Maudu's view regarding guardians in marriage contracts and legal
ijtihad in "Al-Ikhtiyar Li al-Ta'lil al-Mukhtar".
The type of research used in this research is qualitative research
combined with library research in its data collection method which
refers to primary, secondary data sources and also other sources that
support this research. This research is a comparative analysis, namely
describing, analyzing and comparing marriage contracts without
guardians according to the opinions of Sheikh Zainuddin al-Malibari
and Ibnu Maudud. the theory used by Maqasid asy-Syari'ah and bayani
epistemology.
The results of this research show one of the Maqasid ash-
Syari'ah elements used in analyzing the opinions of Sheikh Zainuddin
Al-Malibari and Ibnu Maudud in marriage contracts without guardians.
The author found that the opinion of Sheikh Zainuddin al-Malibari
places greater emphasis on the presence of a guardian in the marriage
contract, because it aims to ensure that the bride's clear nasab (Hifz alnasl)
is maintained. Meanwhile, Ibn Maudu's opinion emphasizes that
women who have reached the age of puberty are considered to have
sufficient maturity and capacity to make decisions regarding their soul
mate and the course of their life without the need for the intervention
of a guardian. This goes into the aspect (Hifz nafs). In Bayani's
epistemological perspective, the results show that the two figures have
different perspectives regarding the texts of the Qur'an and Hadith
دراسة المقارنة عن الولى في عقد النكاح بين إبن قاسم في كتابه فتح القريب و إبن مودود في كتابه الإختيار لتعليل المختار
No full textARABIC :
النكاح بلا ولي يكون جدلًا بين العلماء ، خاصة عند الحنفي الذي يجوز النكاح بلا ولي محالفا بالمذاهب الثلاثة الأخرى. وهكذا يقارن الباحث آراء العلماء من الشافعية والحنفية في كل من كتابهما، فهما فتح القريب لابن قاسم (الشافعية) والاختيار لتعليل المختار لابن مودود (الحنفية). يستخدم الباحث كتاب فتح القريب لأنه مشهور في معظم المعاهد الإسلامية في إندونيسيا وكتاب الاختيار لتعليل المختار كمقارنه. و يستخدم الباحث أيضًا بالترجيح من حيث نظرية الحديث الذي يستخدمانه، أيهما ارجح في الرأي
و الأهداف من هذا البحث يعنى: الاول, لنعرف راي ابن قاسم عن الولى فى عقد النكاح فى كتابه فتح القريب و طريقة استدلال و استنباط حكم منه. الثاني, لنعرف راي مودود عن الولى فى عقد النكاح فى كتابه الأحتيار لتعليل المختار و طريقة استدلال و استنباط حكم منه.الثالث, لنعرف ايهما ارجح من جهة الحديث بين راي ابن قاسم عن الولى فى عقد النكاح فى كتابه فتح القريب و راي ابن مودود عن الولى فى عقد النكاح فى كتابه الأحتيار لتعليل المختار.
و نوع هذا البحث هو البحث المعياري يستخدم التحليل المقارن مع الأساليب الكمية. تم تقسيم مصادر البيانات المستخدمة في هذه الدراسة هو مصدرين وهما الاساسية والثانوية. اما مصادر البيانات الاساسية هى كتاب فتح القريب لابن قاسم والإختيار لتعليل المختار لابن مودود. وتستخدم طريقة عرض البحث هي التحرير والتصنيف والتحليل والاستنتاج. و اما مصادر البيانات الثانوية هم من الكتب والمفكرة والدراسة السابقة.
.و نتيجة هذا البحث: الأول، أن ابن قاسم في كتاب فتح القريب قال إن نكاح لا يصح بدون الولي. الثاني، قال ابن مودود في كتابه الإختيار لتعليل المختار أن عبارة النساء معتبرة في النكاح اي أن النساء بجوز ان تزوج نفسها. الثالث، و بعد أن ترجح الباحث أن رأي ابن قاسم في كتابه فتح القريب أن النكاح يجب أن يكون بإذن الولي لأن الحديث المستخدم ارجح من الحديث المستخدم ابن مودود من حيث سنده ومتنه.
INDONESIA :
Pernikahan tanpa seorang wali menjadi polemik dikalangan para ulama’, terutama pendapat madhab Hanafi membolehkan nikah tanpa wali membedai tiga madhab lainnya. Dengan demikian penulis mengkomparasikan dua pendapat ulama dari kalangan Syafi’iyah dan Hanafiyah dalam masing masing kitabnya yaitu Fathul Qarib karangan Ibnu Qasim (Syafi’iyah) dan Al-ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-mukhtar karangan Ibnu Maudud (Hanafiyah). Penulis menggunakan kitab Fathul Qarib karena kitab tersebut masyhur di kebanyakan pondok pesantren di Indonesia dan kitab Al-ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-mukhtar sebagai pembandingnya. Penulis juga melakukan tarjih dari segi dalil Hadist yang di gunakan oleh kedua ulama' tersebut, manakah yang lebih kuat pendapatnya.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah: Pertama, mengetahui pendapat Ibnu Qasim tentang wali dalam nikah dalam kitabnya “Farhul Qarib” serta istidlal dan istinbath-nya. Kedua, mengetahui pendapat Ibnu Maudud tentang wali dalam nikah dalam kitabnya “Al-Ikhtiyar Lita’lili Al-Mukhtar” serta istidlal dan istinbath-nya. Ketiga, mengetahui manakan yang lebih rojih diantara keduanya dilihatdari segi Hadist yang digunakan.
Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian Normatif yang menggunakan analisis komparatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini di bagi menjadi dua sumber data yaitu primer dan sekunder. Sumber data Primer diperoleh dari metode pengumpulan data yaitu dari kitab Fathul Qarib karangan Ibnu Qasim dan Al-ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-mukhtar karangan Ibnu Maudud. Metode pengolahan data peneliti menggunakan editing, classifiyying, analizying, dan concluding. Sedangkan Sumber Data sekunder diperoleh dari kitab-kitab, jurnal dan skripsi terdahulu.
Penelitian ini menghasilkan; pertama, bahwa Ibnu Qasim dalam kitab Fathul Qarib mengatakan bahawasanya tidak sah hukumnya menikah tanpa wali. kedua, Ibnu Maudud dalam kitabnya mengatakan bahwasanya uangkapan seorang perempuan dapat diakui dalam akad nikah, Artinya seorang perempuan boleh menikahkan dirinya sendiri. Ketiga, bahwasanya setelah dilakukan tarjih pendapat yang lebih unggul adalah pendapat Ibnu Qasim yang mengatakan bahwa pernikahan harus dengan izin dan hadirnya seorang wali karena hadis yang digunakan lebih kuat dari segi sanat maupun matannya.
ENGLISH :
A marriage without a guardian becomes a polemic among Islamic scholars. Those who follow Hanafi school of Islamic law allow marriage without a guardian, unlike those who follow the other three schools of Islamic law. The author compares opinions of two scholars from the Syafi'i and the Hanafi in their respective books: Fathul Qarib written by Ibn Qasim (Syafi'i) and Al-ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-mukhtar by Ibn Maudud (Hanafi). The author uses the book Fathul Qarib as it is well-known in most boarding schools in Indonesia, and the book Al-ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-mukhtar as the comparison. The author also draws the Hadith proposition used by the two scholars to find out which version is more powerful.
The purpose of this study is to (1) find out Ibn Qasim's opinion about the marriage guardian in his book "Farhul Qarib" including his istidlal and istinbath; (2) to find out what Ibn Maudud thinks about the marriage guardian in his book "Al-Ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-Mukhtar" including his istidlal and istinbath; and (3) to find out which is better between the two, as seen from the hadiths used.
This is a normative research which uses comparative analysis with the quantitative approach. The data sources used for this study are divided into two: primary and secondary data sources. The primary sources are the book Fathul Qarib written by Ibn Qasim and Al-ikhtiyar Lita'lili Al-mukhtar by Ibn Maudud. The author uses editing, classifiyying, analizying, and concluding methods to process the data. The secondary data sources, on the other hand, are relevant books, journals, and previous studies.
This research resulted, firstly, that Ibn Qasim in the book Fathul Qarib said that his law was not legal to marry without a guardian. secondly, Ibn Maudud in his book says that the arrest of a woman can be recognized in a contract of marriage, meaning that a woman may marry off herself. Third, that after a superior opinion was made, Ibn Qasim's opinion said that marriage must be with permission and the presence of a wali because the hadith used is stronger in terms of it's sanat and matan
PENDIDIKAN ANAK DALAM KELUARGA (Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Ibnu Qayyim Al Jauziyah dan Muhammad Nur Abdul Hafizh Suwaid)
No full textABSTRAK
Pendidikan anak yang pertama dan yang paling utama adalah
keluarga khususnya orang tua. Pendidikan dalam keluarga yang sesuai
pandangan Islam adalah pendidikan yang didasarkan pada tuntunan
agama Islam, pendidikan tersebut dimaksudkan untuk membentuk
anak agar menjadi anak yang beriman, bertakwa kepada Allah Swt
serta berakhlak mulia.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana hasil komparasi
dari pemikiran Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyah dan Muhammad Nur Abdul
Hafizh Suwaid mengenai pendidikan anak dalam keluarga dalam
bukunya yang berjudul Tuhfatul Maudud bi Ahkamil Maulud dan
Propertic Parenting cara Nabi Mendidik Anak.
Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian
pustaka atau kajian pustaka dengan sumber buku primer Tuhfatul
Maudud bi Ahkamil Maulud dan Propertic Parenting cara Nabi
Mendidik Anak. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis
isi dan pendekatan analisis komperatif yang biasa disebut studi
komparasi. Studi komparasi adalah penelitian yang bertujuan untuk
membandingkam dua variabel atau lebih, untuk mendapatkan jawaban
atau fakta, apakah ada perbandingan atau tidak dari objek yang sedang
diteliti.
Hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis terkait pendidikan
anak dalam keluarga menurut Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyah dan
Muhammad Nur Abdul Hafizh Suwaid diantaranya adalah
menentukan pasangan yang shalih/shalihah, mendidik atau adab pada
saat anak dalam kandungan (Prenatal), tanggung jawab orang tua
terhadap pendidikan anak dalam segi keimanan, moral, akal, sosial,
fisik, kejiwaan dan seks adapun perbedaan terdapat pada istilah
penyebutan jenis-jenis tanggung jawab pendidikan. Kemudian metode
yang digunakan dalam mendidik anak yaitu seperti keteladanan,
pembiasaan dan hukuman.
Kata kunci : Pendidikan Anak / Pendidikan dalam Keluarga /
Pemikiran Ibnu Qayyim / Pemikiran Muhammad Nur Abdul Hafiz
Suwaid
iii
ABSTRACT
The first and most important education of children is the family,
especially the parents. Education in the family that is in accordance
with Islamic views is education that is based on the guidance of the
Islamic religion. This education is intended to shape children to
become children who believe, are devoted to Allah SWT and have
noble character.
This research aims to find out how the comparative result of Ibnu
Qayyim Al-Jauziyah and Muhammad Nur Abdul Hafizh Suwaid
thoughts on the education of children in the family in their book
titledTuhfatul Maudud bi Ahkamil Maulud and Propertic Parenting
the way the Prophet educates children.
The method used in this research is library research or literature
review using the primary book sources Tuhfatul Maudud bi Ahkamil
Maulud and Propetic Parenting, the Prophet’s Way of Educating
Children. The data analysis techique used is content analysis and a
comparative analysis approach which is usually called a comparative
study. A comparative study is research that aims to comparetwo or
more variables, to get answer or facts, whether there is a comparison
or nor of the objects being studied.
The result of research conducted by the author regarding children’s
education in the family according to Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyah and
Muhammad Nur Abdul Hafizh Suwaid include determining a
pious/salihah partner, education or manners when the child is in the
prenatal, parents’ responsibility for education children in terms of
faith, morals, reason, social, physical, psychological and sexual. There
are differences in terms of the types of educational responsibilities.
Then the methods used in educating children are example, habituation
and punishment.
Keywords : Children’s Education / Education in the Family /
Thoughts of Ibnu Qayyim / The thoughts of Muhammad Nur Abdul
Hafizh Suwai
