1,720,961 research outputs found
Biologic and pharmacologic therapies in clinical development for the inflammatory response in COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive and debilitating condition with declining lung function associated with airway inflammation, mucus hypersecretion and remodeling. Inflammatory cells contribute to the disease processes via the production of proteases, fibrotic or mitogenic growth factors, cytokines, chemokines and their receptors. Particularly newer agents that treat the underlying inflammation and remodeling. Here, we briefly review current understanding of the inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of COPD. This understanding has enabled the identification of several therapeutic targets that might have great potential for the development of novel anti-inflammatory and anti-remodeling biologic therapies with considerable clinical advantage for COPD. Some of these molecules have been assessed, and others are in the early stages of being assessed. This article gives an up-to-date summary of these novel therapies and their status of clinical development in targeting the various inflammatory pathways of COPD
Differential pharmacology and clinical utility of emerging combination treatments in the management of COPD – role of umeclidinium/vilanterol
Mario Malerba,1 Jaymin Bhagwanji Morjaria,2 Alessandro Radaeli3 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 2Department of Academic Respiratory Medicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, United Kingdom; 3Department of Emergency, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy Abstract: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. Bronchodilator therapy is the cornerstone in COPD treatment. Bronchodilation in COPD is mainly achieved via administration of long- and ultralong-acting β2-agonists and with long-acting muscarinic antagonists. New combinations of bronchodilators with dual-acting muscarinic antagonist and β2-agonist properties have been licensed, and others are currently being developed with the aim of achieving once-daily dosing, and therefore may improve the likelihood of treatment compliance. These combination bronchodilators include glycopyrronium bromide/indacaterol maleate, umeclidinium (UMEC) bromide/vilanterol trifenatate (VI), aclidinium bromide/formoterol and tiotropium bromide/olodaterol (Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany). This review will focus mainly on studies and clinical trials involving the novel fixed-dose combination of UMEC/VI at doses of 125/25 µg and 62.5/25 µg in patients with COPD. Data from large clinical trials involving more than 4,500 COPD patients indicate that UMEC/VI is an effective once-daily treatment in COPD with improved pulmonary function. Future studies assessing the impact of this combination on exacerbations, delay in disease progression, and health status in patients with COPD are warranted. Keywords: COPD treatment, umeclidinium, vilanterol, bronchodilators combination, long acting beta2-agonists, long acting muscarinic receptor antagonist
Vilanterol trifenatate for the treatment of COPD
INTRODUCTION: Currently the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has limited effectiveness and there is a need to develop new drugs. International guidelines recommend the use of long-acting bronchodilators (β2 agonists and anti-cholinergics/muscarinics), inhaled steroids and associations between these drugs in the maintenance treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD.
AREA COVERED:
Vilanterol trifenate is a new once-daily highly selective β2-agonist available in USA and Europe in association with umeclidinium bromide (a long-acting anti-muscarnic agent) and fluticasone furoate (an inhaled corticosteroid) for the once-daily maintenance treatment of COPD. Vilanterol combined in fixed-dose treatments has been tested in numerous clinical trials involving thousands of patients. Expert commentary: These new once-daily formulations have the potential to improve compliance to long-term inhaled therapy. This paper will review the clinical and experimental data regarding vilanterol use in the regular treatment of COPD as well as provide a critical discussion of possible future treatment settings
Changes in breathomics from a 1-year randomized smoking cessation trial of electronic cigarettes.
Background: Electronic cigarette (EC) use is an emerging behaviour that has been shown to help smokers to reduce cigarette consumption. The aim of this study was to illustrate long-term changes in exhaled breath measurements and respiratory symptoms in smokers invited to quit or reduce their cigarette consumption by switching to ECs. Materials and methods: Prospective evaluation of cigarette consumption, fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO), exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and symptom scores was performed in a 1-year randomized, controlled trial of ‘healthy’ smokers receiving 2·4% nicotine, 1·8% nicotine or no nicotine ECs. FeNO and eCO data are presented on the basis of participants’ pooled continuous smoking phenotype classification (failures, reducers and quitters). Results: A significant effect of quitting classification was found on FeNo and eCO at all time points (P < 0·0001). Among quitters, FeNO (medians and interquartile range) rose from 5·5 (4·5–6·9) ppb to 17·7 (13·3–18·9) ppb by week 52. Baseline eCO (medians and interquartile range) decreased from 17 (12–20) ppm to 3 (1–4) ppm by week 52. No significant changes in FeNO and eCO levels were observed in failures and reducers. Improvements in FeNO and eCO levels were correlated with attenuations in symptom scores. Conclusions: Smokers invited to switch to electronic cigarettes who completely abstained from smoking showed steady progressive improvements in their exhaled breath measurements and symptom scores. FeNo and eCO normalization is highly supportive of improved respiratory health outcomes and adds to the notion that quitting from tobacco smoking can reverse harm in the lung
Effect of acute exacerbations on circulating endothelial, clotting and fibrinolytic markers in COPD patients.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prone to clinical exacerbations that are associated with increased airway inflammation, a potent pro-thrombotic stimulus. Limited information is available on the mechanisms underlying the putative alterations of the endothelial-coagulative system during acute exacerbations. The aim was to investigate whether the activation of the endothelial-coagulative system occurs in association with the acute inflammatory response of COPD exacerbation. We monitored the blood levels of surrogate markers of inflammation: interleukin-6 (IL-6); endothelium damage: von Willebrand's factor (vWF); clotting activation: D-dimer (D-D), and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2); fibrinolytic response: plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), in COPD subjects, during hospital admission and after clinical resolution. In 30 COPD subjects, IL-6, vWF, D-D and F1+2 levels were elevated during exacerbation and decreased significantly at clinical stability (IL-6, p = 0.005; vWF, p < 0.001; D-D, p < 0.001; F1+2, p < 0.001). PAI-1 levels did not change at exacerbation compared to clinically stable situations. Positive correlations were observed between several of the markers measured. Elevation of IL-6, vWF, D-D and F1+2 levels during COPD exacerbations implies a strict association between acute inflammation, endothelial activation and clotting initiation. This was not associated with a change in PAI-1, implying an increase in the fibrinolytic response to inflammation. The pro-thrombotic nature of COPD exacerbations sustained by enhanced clotting activation appears to be mitigated by excessive fibrinolysis
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
