186,329 research outputs found
Encountering Terra Australis: The Australian voyages of Nicolas Baudin and Matthew Flinders
Revised editionJean Fornasiero; Peter Monteath and John West-Soob
Evidence for distal transport of reworked Andean tephra: extending the cryptotephra framework from the Austral volcanic zone
Cryptotephra deposits (non-visible volcanic ash beds) may extend thousands of kilometres and provide valuable chronological isochrons. Here, we present a Lateglacial-early Holocene (c. 16,500 cal yr BP-6000 cal yr BP) tephrostratigraphy from Hooker's Point, East Falkland, South Atlantic. This period spans the last glacial termination across the southern mid-latitudes, a time period during which the palaeoenvironmental record is poorly resolved in southern South America and the South Atlantic. The development of a regional tephrostratigraphy will provide chronological constraint for palaeoenvironmental records from this period. Two cryptotephra deposits from Hooker's Point are linked with Mt. Burney, including the early-Holocene MB
1
tephra, while a third is likely to be derived from the R
1
eruption of Reclus volcano. The high shard abundance of these cryptotephra deposits suggests they extend further into the Southern Ocean, and may act as regional stratigraphic markers during the Lateglacial. Further peaks in shard abundance are composed of detrital glass (tephra not derived from primary air fall events), with mixed shard morphologies and geochemically heterogeneous glass populations. This detrital glass is likely to have been repeatedly reworked by wind action in the Patagonian Steppe before final deposition in the Falkland Islands. The high abundance of detrital glass in the Hooker's Point sequence suggests long distance transport of reworked tephra is common in this region, and highlights the need to carefully analyse cryptotephra deposits in order to avoid incorrectly describing reworked tephra as new isochrons. A temporal pattern of shard abundance is apparent in the Hooker's Point sequence with a reduction/absence of shards between 14,300–10,500 cal yr BP.
</p
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
This video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
Author Rights and Scholarly Publishing
Originally posted at
http://blog.library.gsu.edu/2014/10/24/author-rights-and-scholarly-publishing/</p
- …
