1,722,790 research outputs found
Don't Ever Discuss Rust v. Sullivan With a Lady in a Grocery Line.
Full text linkMitchell, John B.. (1992). Don't Ever Discuss Rust v. Sullivan With a Lady in a Grocery Line.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/166197
Another Chat With the Lady in the Grocery Line: Clinton v. Jones
Full text linkMitchell, John B.. (1998). Another Chat With the Lady in the Grocery Line: Clinton v. Jones. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/167779
Enabling Energy Efficiency in Rental Housing: Overcoming the Split Incentives Barrier
No full textMitchell, John; Nissen, Will. (2011). Enabling Energy Efficiency in Rental Housing: Overcoming the Split Incentives Barrier. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107532
Land Grant Application- Mitchell, John (Hampton)
Full text linkLand grant application submitted to the Maine Land Office for John Mitchell for service in the Revolutionary War.https://digitalmaine.com/revolutionary_war_me_land_office/1652/thumbnail.jp
A Word on Ornament and its Uses
No full textMitchell John. A Word on Ornament and its Uses. In: Le rôle de l’ornement dans la peinture murale du Moyen Âge [Actes du colloque international tenu à Saint-Lizier, 1er – 4 juin 1995] Poitiers : Centre d'études supérieures de civilisation médiévale, 1997. pp. 213-215. (Civilisation Médiévale, 4
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
