3,847 research outputs found
Mathematics, Logic, and their Philosophies:Essays in Honour of Mohammad Ardeshir
No full textThis volume is a collection of essays in honour of Professor Mohammad Ardeshir. It examines topics which, in one way or another, are connected to the various aspects of his multidisciplinary research interests. Based on this criterion, the book is divided into three general categories. The first category includes papers on non-classical logics, including intuitionistic logic, constructive logic, basic logic, and substructural logic. The second category is made up of papers discussing issues in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics and logic. The third category contains papers on Avicenna’s logic and philosophy.Mohammad Ardeshir is a full professor of mathematical logic at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, where he has taught generations of students for around a quarter century. Mohammad Ardeshir is known in the first place for his prominent works in basic logic and constructive mathematics. His areas of interest are however much broader and include topics in intuitionistic philosophy of mathematics and Arabic philosophy of logic and mathematics. In addition to numerous research articles in leading international journals, Ardeshir is the author of a highly praised Persian textbook in mathematical logic. Partly through his writings and translations, the school of mathematical intuitionism was introduced to the Iranian academic community
Mathematics, Logic, and their Philosophies:Essays in Honour of Mohammad Ardeshir
No full textThis volume is a collection of essays in honour of Professor Mohammad Ardeshir. It examines topics which, in one way or another, are connected to the various aspects of his multidisciplinary research interests. Based on this criterion, the book is divided into three general categories. The first category includes papers on non-classical logics, including intuitionistic logic, constructive logic, basic logic, and substructural logic. The second category is made up of papers discussing issues in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics and logic. The third category contains papers on Avicenna’s logic and philosophy.Mohammad Ardeshir is a full professor of mathematical logic at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, where he has taught generations of students for around a quarter century. Mohammad Ardeshir is known in the first place for his prominent works in basic logic and constructive mathematics. His areas of interest are however much broader and include topics in intuitionistic philosophy of mathematics and Arabic philosophy of logic and mathematics. In addition to numerous research articles in leading international journals, Ardeshir is the author of a highly praised Persian textbook in mathematical logic. Partly through his writings and translations, the school of mathematical intuitionism was introduced to the Iranian academic community
Rhetoric of the old Arab prose text :The principles and components
No full textتروم هذه المداخلة اقتراح مقاربة للنص النثري العربي القديم، تستند إلى الأساس النظري الذي أقامه أرسطو في نظريته البلاغية، والمتمثل في أن النص يشكّل بلاغته معتمدًا أطراف التواصل الأساس (المتكلم والخطاب والمخاطَب)؛ فالمتكلم يسعى إلى تشكيل صورة عن ذاته في الخطاب لكي يجعله مقبولا لدى المتلقي (الإيتوس)، على نحو ما يسعى إلى إثارة نوازع المخاطَب وأهوائه، للتأثير فيه (الباتوس)، ويسعى إلى أن يصوغ خطابه بشكل يقبله العقل، مستخدما في ذلك تقنيات ومواضع حجاجية (اللوجوس) بيد ان هذا الإطار النظري المعتمد في المقاربة، ليس إلّا منطلقا عاما يكيّف التوجه البلاغي للمقاربة التي ستجد نفسها وهي تقتحم عالم النصوص والخطابات، مجبرة على الانفتاح على حقول غير بلاغية بالمعنى المدرسي المألوف؛ فنقل النظرية البلاغية الأرسطية إلى حيّز الممارسة، واستثمارها في تأويل الخطابات، يجعل هذه المقاربة تواجه مشكلاتٍ حقيقية لا يمكن الخروج منها إلّا بالانتفاع بمفهومات وأدوات صيغت في نظريات نصية من قبيل "الشعرية" و"اللسانيات التداولية" و"النقد الإيديولوجي" و"تحليل الخطاب" وغيرها.This study suggests an approach to old Arab texts in prose based on the Aristotle basic
rhetoric theory. The rhetoric text came from main communication parts (speaker, discourse
and Addressee). The speaker is trying to structure his own image in the discourse in order
to become acceptable from the receiver (Ethos). In a manner raises the whims of addressee
to influence him (Pathos) in addition to shape the discourse in order to be acceptable from
the mind using Argumentation tools (Logos). Despite this theoretical frame approach, it
is just trying to adapt rhetoric trends to the approach that find itself breaking the texts and
discourses and forced to obtain a more open mind against unrhetorical fields. Moving
the rhetoric Aristotle from the theory to practice the approach for the interpretation, the
discourses cause some problems, and this is required to apply concepts and tools that
come from text theory such as a poetic, linguistics, deliberative, ideological criticism,
discourse analysis, and so on
Mathematics, Logic, and their Philosophies:Essays in Honour of Mohammad Ardeshir
No full textThis volume is a collection of essays in honour of Professor Mohammad Ardeshir. It examines topics which, in one way or another, are connected to the various aspects of his multidisciplinary research interests. Based on this criterion, the book is divided into three general categories. The first category includes papers on non-classical logics, including intuitionistic logic, constructive logic, basic logic, and substructural logic. The second category is made up of papers discussing issues in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics and logic. The third category contains papers on Avicenna’s logic and philosophy.Mohammad Ardeshir is a full professor of mathematical logic at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, where he has taught generations of students for around a quarter century. Mohammad Ardeshir is known in the first place for his prominent works in basic logic and constructive mathematics. His areas of interest are however much broader and include topics in intuitionistic philosophy of mathematics and Arabic philosophy of logic and mathematics. In addition to numerous research articles in leading international journals, Ardeshir is the author of a highly praised Persian textbook in mathematical logic. Partly through his writings and translations, the school of mathematical intuitionism was introduced to the Iranian academic community
Mathematics, Logic, and their Philosophies:Essays in Honour of Mohammad Ardeshir
No full textThis volume is a collection of essays in honour of Professor Mohammad Ardeshir. It examines topics which, in one way or another, are connected to the various aspects of his multidisciplinary research interests. Based on this criterion, the book is divided into three general categories. The first category includes papers on non-classical logics, including intuitionistic logic, constructive logic, basic logic, and substructural logic. The second category is made up of papers discussing issues in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics and logic. The third category contains papers on Avicenna’s logic and philosophy.Mohammad Ardeshir is a full professor of mathematical logic at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, where he has taught generations of students for around a quarter century. Mohammad Ardeshir is known in the first place for his prominent works in basic logic and constructive mathematics. His areas of interest are however much broader and include topics in intuitionistic philosophy of mathematics and Arabic philosophy of logic and mathematics. In addition to numerous research articles in leading international journals, Ardeshir is the author of a highly praised Persian textbook in mathematical logic. Partly through his writings and translations, the school of mathematical intuitionism was introduced to the Iranian academic community
Mathematics, Logic, and their Philosophies:Essays in Honour of Mohammad Ardeshir
No full textThis volume is a collection of essays in honour of Professor Mohammad Ardeshir. It examines topics which, in one way or another, are connected to the various aspects of his multidisciplinary research interests. Based on this criterion, the book is divided into three general categories. The first category includes papers on non-classical logics, including intuitionistic logic, constructive logic, basic logic, and substructural logic. The second category is made up of papers discussing issues in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics and logic. The third category contains papers on Avicenna’s logic and philosophy.Mohammad Ardeshir is a full professor of mathematical logic at the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, where he has taught generations of students for around a quarter century. Mohammad Ardeshir is known in the first place for his prominent works in basic logic and constructive mathematics. His areas of interest are however much broader and include topics in intuitionistic philosophy of mathematics and Arabic philosophy of logic and mathematics. In addition to numerous research articles in leading international journals, Ardeshir is the author of a highly praised Persian textbook in mathematical logic. Partly through his writings and translations, the school of mathematical intuitionism was introduced to the Iranian academic community
'Fatherless' of Mohammad Mosavat: The cultural event of the Iranian spring
No full textThe following is a psychoanalytic commentary about a play recently performed in Tehran (Iran) followed by an interview with its author, Mohammad Mosavat. The co-signatories both attended a performance of this play. Invited by Shahid Behesti, Alzahra, and Shiraz Universities for many public lectures and supervisions, the French psychoanalyst Jean-Luc Vannier signs the commentary while the interview and the translation were conducted by the Iranian psychoanalyst in training at the Freudian Group of Tehran, Mahyar Ali Naghi
RoMEO Studies 4: An analysis of Journal publishers' Copyright Agreements
No full textThis article is the fourth in a series of six emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open archiving). It describes an analysis of 80 scholarly journal publishers’ copyright agreements with a particular view to their effect on author self-archiving. 90% of agreements asked for copyright transfer and 69% asked for it prior to refereeing the paper. 75% asked authors to warrant that their work had not been previously published although only two explicitly stated that they viewed self-archiving as prior publication. 28.5% of agreements provided authors with no usage rights over their own paper. Although 42.5% allowed self-archiving in some format, there was no consensus on the conditions under which self-archiving could take place. The article concludes that author-publisher copyright agreements should be reconsidered by a working party representing the needs of both partie
Rhetoric of the old Arab prose text :The principles and components
No full textتروم هذه المداخلة اقتراح مقاربة للنص النثري العربي القديم، تستند إلى الأساس النظري الذي أقامه أرسطو في نظريته البلاغية، والمتمثل في أن النص يشكّل بلاغته معتمدًا أطراف التواصل الأساس (المتكلم والخطاب والمخاطَب)؛ فالمتكلم يسعى إلى تشكيل صورة عن ذاته في الخطاب لكي يجعله مقبولا لدى المتلقي (الإيتوس)، على نحو ما يسعى إلى إثارة نوازع المخاطَب وأهوائه، للتأثير فيه (الباتوس)، ويسعى إلى أن يصوغ خطابه بشكل يقبله العقل، مستخدما في ذلك تقنيات ومواضع حجاجية (اللوجوس) بيد ان هذا الإطار النظري المعتمد في المقاربة، ليس إلّا منطلقا عاما يكيّف التوجه البلاغي للمقاربة التي ستجد نفسها وهي تقتحم عالم النصوص والخطابات، مجبرة على الانفتاح على حقول غير بلاغية بالمعنى المدرسي المألوف؛ فنقل النظرية البلاغية الأرسطية إلى حيّز الممارسة، واستثمارها في تأويل الخطابات، يجعل هذه المقاربة تواجه مشكلاتٍ حقيقية لا يمكن الخروج منها إلّا بالانتفاع بمفهومات وأدوات صيغت في نظريات نصية من قبيل الشعرية و اللسانيات التداولية و النقد الإيديولوجي و تحليل الخطاب وغيرها.This study suggests an approach to old Arab texts in prose based on the Aristotle basic rhetoric theory. The rhetoric text came from main communication parts (speaker, discourse and Addressee). The speaker is trying to structure his own image in the discourse in order to become acceptable from the receiver (Ethos). In a manner raises the whims of addressee to influence him (Pathos) in addition to shape the discourse in order to be acceptable from the mind using Argumentation tools (Logos). Despite this theoretical frame approach, it is just trying to adapt rhetoric trends to the approach that find itself breaking the texts and discourses and forced to obtain a more open mind against unrhetorical fields. Moving the rhetoric Aristotle from the theory to practice the approach for the interpretation, the discourses cause some problems, and this is required to apply concepts and tools that come from text theory such as a poetic, linguistics, deliberative, ideological criticism, discourse analysis, and so on
Author Correction: Smartphone‑based device for point‑of‑care diagnostics of pulmonary infammation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs)
No full textCorrection to: Scientific Reportshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54939-4, published online 22 March 2024 The original version of this Article contained an error in the author name S. Mohammad-Reza Taheri which was incorrectly given as Seyed Mohammad Reza Taheri. In addition, an affiliation was omitted for S. Mohammad-Reza Taheri. The correct affiliations for S. Mohammad-Reza Taheri are listed below. Groningen University, University Medical Center groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713AW Groningen, the Netherlands. Condensed Matter National Laboratory, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran. Moreover, Hossein Simaee was incorrectly affiliated with ‘Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417614335, Iran’ and ‘Integrated Biophysics and Bioengineering Lab (iBL), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417614335, Iran’. The correct affiliation for Hossein Simaee is listed below. Cardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The original Article has been corrected.</p
- …
