1,720,960 research outputs found
Policy instruments from the Mexican STPI Team
A collection of policy instruments from the Mexican team for the Science and Techology Policy Instruments (STPI) Projec
Technological policy of a state enterprise : the case of the oil monopoly “Petroleos Mexicanos”; summary
“Presented by the Mexican STPI team to the Buenos Aires Meeting on State Firms
Characteristic of Mexico's scientific and technological system in 1973
Spanish version available in IDRC Digital Library: Características del sístema científico y tecnológico de Mexico en 1973."Report corresponding to phase 1 of the project on Science and Technology Policy Instruments, presented by the Mexican STPI Team, May, 1974
Historical background of Mexico's scientific and technological system
"Report on phase one of the research project on science and technology policy instruments. Presented by the Mexican STPI Team, May 1974"Spanish version available in IDRC Digital Library: Antecedentes del sístema científico y tecnológico de Mexic
Progress report from the Mexican STPI team (Cairo)
Meeting: Meeting of the Coordinating Committee of the Science and Technology Policy Instruments (STPI) Project, 3rd, 24 November-3 December, 1974, Cairo, E
Progress report from the Mexican STPI Team (New Delhi)
Meeting: Meeting of the Coordinating Committee of the Science and Technology Policy Instruments (STPI) Project, 5th, 31 January-10 February, 1976, New Delhi, I
Progress report from the Mexican STPI team (Seoul)
Meeting: Meeting of the Coordinating Committee of the Science and Technology Policy Instruments (STPI) Project, 4th, 7-16 July, 1975, Seoul, K
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
