1,721,067 research outputs found
Improving cochlear implant rehabilitation
Leemans, C.R. [Promotor]Kramer, S.E. [Promotor]Smits, J.C.M. [Copromotor]Merkus, P. [Copromotor
Development and implementation of an ICF-based e-intake tool in clinical otology and audiology practice: viewing the patient from a biopsychosocial perspective
Kramer, S.E. [Promotor]Goverts, S.T. [Copromotor]Merkus, P. [Copromotor]Pronk, M. [Copromotor
Auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patients: results and review of the literature
Objective: Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) patients have multiple central nervous system tumors and, specifically, bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs) causing bilateral deafness. If the cochlear nerve is not preserved during tumor removal, the only hearing rehabilitation in these patients could be via an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Study Design: Retrospective case study and literature review. Setting: Tertiary referral cranial base center. Patients: In 24 NF2 patients, 25 ABIs were placed in the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle after VS surgery via a translabyrinthine approach. Results: In this series, a large range of results are observed: from open speech and use of the telephone to no ABI use, because of the poor sound identification ability. Of the 24 patients, 19 use their ABI on a daily basis, 4 are nonusers, and 1 died of NF2 progression. A multivariate analysis did not reveal a good predictor for ABI outcome. In literature, the results of ABI in NF2 are difficult to compare, and the overall outcome was poor compared with cochlear implantation results. Conclusion: Auditory brainstem implantation in NF2 patients directly after tumor removal is a safe procedure and the best means of hearing rehabilitation if the cochlear nerve is not preserved. The results in NF2 cases in the literature and these series are poor compared with cochlear implantation. If a cochlear implant is possible, it has the preference over an ABI, also in NF2. Nevertheless, the majority of the patients have benefit of the ABI during daily life particularly in combination with lip reading
Less than 1% cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 1,803 translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery cases.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the incidence rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery since the alteration of the surgical procedure. To compare with previous series and other series in literature.
STUDY DESIGN:
Database analysis.
SETTING:
Tertiary referral neurotologic private practice.
PATIENTS:
A series of 1,803 patients who underwent translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery between 1993 and 2009. The result of this group was compared with corresponding series.
INTERVENTION:
Translabyrinthine and extended translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Literature review and comparison.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Rates of CSF leak in this series and historical perspective of the outcome.
RESULTS:
Fifteen patients (0.8%) of 1,803 cases had CSF leaks. The method used since 1993 has shown a significant improvement compared with major case series of the last 10 years.
CONCLUSION:
The methods used in translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery in our center can reduce CSF leakage to an absolute minimum. Compared with all large series, this could be a new era of translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
