1,721,398 research outputs found
Plan de gestion des données de l'Unité Expérimentale Forêt Pierroton (PGD UEFP)
Plan de gestion des données de l'Unité Expérimentale Forêt Pierroton (PGD UEFP)
L'UEFP est une unité expérimentale de l’Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), rattachée au département ECODIV (Ecologie et Diversité) (https://doi.org/10.15454/1.5483264699193726E12). Elle constitue un support aux recherches menées sur les écosystèmes forestiers.
L'UEFP génère une grande quantité de données, de nature variée et ayant une grande importance patrimoniale. Ces données sont organisées dans différents systèmes d'information.
Vous pouvez citer le DOI de ce PGD UEFP.</p
Rapport III.8. Modélisation appliquée au transfert des polluants dans le sous-sol
Allesandrello E., Pennequin Didier, Meredieu J. de, Guyonnet D. Rapport III.8. Modélisation appliquée au transfert des polluants dans le sous-sol. In: Les eaux souterraines et la gestion des eaux. Progrès - qualité - quantité. Vingt et unièmes journées de l'hydraulique. Sophia-Antipolis, 29-31 janvier1991. Tome 3, 1991
Measured and estimated tree dimensions of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) and birch (Betula pendula) in the tree diversity experiment ORPHEE at the end of 2014
The ORPHEE experiment is located 40km south of Bordeaux (44°440 N, 00° 460 W) and belongs to the worldwide Tree Diversity Network (TreeDivNet). The experimental plantation was established in January 2008 on a clear cut of former maritime pine stands on a sandy podzol. Eight blocks were established, with 32 plots in every block. Each plot contained 10 rows of 10 trees planted 2 m apart, resulting in 100 trees within a plot of 400 m². The total initial stand density was therefore 2500 trees per hectare in each plot. Each plot was planted with one to five species. Only maritime pine (Pinus pinaster/Ppin) and silver birch (Betula pendula/Bpen) were considered in this data set.
For this study, we have selected 14 plots per blocks. The present data set is composed by data collected in 2014 (7 years-old) on the target trees at the center of the plots in order to avoid edge effects (measured planting locations = 36).
The total height was measured on living trees using a graduate pole. We also measured circumferences at 1.30m height on 7 randomly chosen pines and 7 randomly chosen birches per plot. We estimated missing tree heights and circumferences and tree volumes by:
- Using height-circumference relationships to estimate the circumferences of trees that have not been measured in 2014 by mean of separate generalized additive models for each stand composition and tree density.
- Using the generic model developed by Deleuze et al. (2014) to aboveground tree volumes. We assigned a minimum volume of 0.01m3/ha to the few trees below 1.30m in height (corresponding to the minimum volume found in the data set).
- Eventually we estimated dimensions of dead trees by averaging diameter, height and volume of living trees in the plot
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
