1,720,960 research outputs found
Valtaistava ja yhteistyötä avaava haastattelumenetelmä perhelähtöisessä interventiossa
No full textTutkimuksen tarkoitus on kuvata, millainen on menetelmä ja työskentelytapa, joka perustuu vanhempien ja ammatti-ihmisten tasavertaiselle yhteistyölle. Tutkin myös, mitä menetelmän käyttäjiltä edellytetään, jotta interventio voisi tapahtua perhelähtöisesti, ja mikä merkitys perhelähtöisellä interventiolla on perheen lisäksi palvelujärjestelmälle. Tässä kahdeksasta erillisestä julkaisusta koostuvassa väitöskirjatyössä etsitään vastauksia näihin kysymyksiin.
Väitöskirja sisältää tämän yhteenvetoartikkelin lisäksi kirjallisuuskatsauksen tapausesimerkkeineen (1993), kaksi teoreettisia suuntauksia pohtivaa artikkelia (1994b, 1997), kaksi empiiriseen tutkimukseen perustuvaa artikkelia (1995, 2001a) ja opaskirjan tutkitun haastattelumenetelmän (HMI) käyttäjille (1994a, päivitetty 1999).
Tutkimustyön primaarivaiheen tuloksena on kehitetty perhelähtöinen työväline "Haastattelumenetelmä interventiona" (HMI) perheiden kanssa työskenteleville kuntoutuksen, varhaisvuosien erityiskasvatuksen ja lastensuojelun ammatti-ihmisille. Uuden toiminta tavan arviointi suoritetaan empiirisen tutkimuksen pohjalta julkaistun aineiston sekundaarianalyysilla. Suodattimena analyysissa käytetään käsitteitä valtaistaminen vs. valtaistuminen (empowerment), yhteistyön avaaminen (partnership) ja perhelähtöinen interventio. Taustateoria lähtee ekologisista teorioista, mutta perheen arjen ja perhekulttuurien huomioon ottaminen edellyttää lisäksi ekokulttuurista ajattelua.
Tutkimustulokset osoittavat, että 1) valtaistaminen ja valtaistuminen kuvaavat vallan ja vastuun jakamisen eri puolia, 2) auttamisesta ei ole aina apua, ellei erilaisia perhekulttuureja ja perheenjäsenten erilaisia rooleja oteta huomioon ja 3) jaettu asiantuntijuus perheiden, ammatti-ihmisten ja viranomaisten kesken saattaa antaa hyvinvointiyhteiskunnan palvelujärjestelmälle käyttökelpoisia toimintatapoja.The purpose of my study is to describe what kind of a working method is a method that is based on arentprofessional partnerships. Furthermore, I study what is presupposed from its users in order to implement familycentered intervention and what does it mean to the service system. This dissertation work consists of eight different publications where there are answers sought to these questions.
Besides this present article, my dissertation work includes a review with examples of a couple of cases (1993), two theoretical articles (1994b; 1997), two articles based on emprical study (1995; 2001a), and two manuals for the users of the method studied here (1994a; 1999).
The result of the primary study was a familycentered instrument called AInterview as intervention@ for professionals who work with families of children with special needs. The new working style has been evaluated by analysing formerly published material based on my empirical study. As a filter of the secondary analysis were used concepts of empowerment, partnership, and familycentered intervention. The theories in the background are ecological and ecocultural because of the need to consider daily life and different cultures of families.
The results of my study show that 1) empowerment means power as well as responsibility, 2) helpful helping equires that family cultures and different roles of family members are taken into consideration, and 3) shared expertise between families, professionals, and public authorities may give a useful policy to the service system of an affluent society.ei tietoa saavutettavuudest
Project "Hope" / Proekt "Nadežda":developing rehabilitation practices for children with disabilities in the Murmansk Area
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
