1,720,955 research outputs found
The Integration-Interconnection Paradigm in Islamic Law: Al-Syatibi’s Thought in Al-Muwafaqat
Full text linkThe study of Islamic law has tend to focus on the textual approach and often neglects its interaction with rational sciences. Al-Syatibi’s thought in Al-Muwafaqat offers a new paradigm that combines textual analysis with social reality through the maqasid al-shari’ah approach. However, previous academic studies have not specifically explored how Al-Syatibi’s ideas can be a methodological foundation for the integration-interconnection paradigm. This research uses a text analysis method with a historical-critical and contextual approach to Al-Muwafaqat and related literature. The data is analyzed to understand the relationship between textual and rational epistemology in the study of Islamic law. Al-Syatibi emphasized the importance of the rational-empirical approach in the investigation of Islamic jurisprudence. According to him, the study of Islamic law must involve textual methodology (al-ijtihad fi al-nash) and rational-empirical methodology (al-ijtihad fi al-waqi’). The idea expressed by Al-Syatibi can be interpreted as legitimizing the importance of an integrated and interconnected paradigm in Islamic studies, which includes the field of Islamic law. This study emphasizes that integrating social science, economics, and science in the analysis of Islamic law can answer epistemological and contextual challenges.
Kajian hukum Islam selama ini cenderung terfokus pada pendekatan tekstual dan sering diabaikan integrasinya dengan ilmu-ilmu rasional. Pemikiran Al-Syatibi dalam Al-Muwafaqat menawarkan paradigma baru yang menggabungkan analisis teks dengan realitas sosial melalui pendekatan maqasid al-shari’ah. Namun, kajian akademik sebelumnya belum secara spesifik mengeksplorasi bagaimana gagasan Al-Syatibi dapat menjadi landasan metodologis untuk paradigma integrasi-interkoneksi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis teks dengan pendekatan historis-kritis dan kontekstual terhadap Al-Muwafaqat serta literatur terkait. Data dianalisis untuk memahami hubungan antara epistemologi tekstual dan rasional dalam studi hukum Islam. Al-Syatibi menekankan pentingnya pendekatan rasional-empiris dalam penyelidikan yurisprudensi Islam. Menurutnya, studi hukum Islam harus melibatkan metodologi tekstual (al-ijtihad fi al-nash) dan metodologi rasional-empiris (al-ijtihad fi al-waqi’). Gagasan yang diungkapkan oleh Al-Syatibi dapat diartikan sebagai legitimasi pentingnya paradigma yang terintegrasi dan terinterkoneksi dalam studi Islam, yang meliputi bidang hukum Islam. Studi ini menekankan bahwa pengintegrasian ilmu sosial, ekonomi, dan sains dalam analisis hukum Islam dapat menjawab tantangan epistemologis dan kontekstual
Khilafah Islamiyyah: dari Wahdah Al-Dawlah menuju Wahdah Al-Ummah
No full textPerdebatan tentang KhilÄfah IslÄmÄ«yyah belum menunjukkan tanda akan berakhir. Pada saat itu pula, perjuangan beberapa gerakan Islam untuk kembali menegakkan KhilÄfah IslÄmÄ«yyah semakin menguat saja. Upaya mengurai permasalahan KhilÄfah IslÄmÄ«yyah ibarat menyelam dalam banjir air bah di mana seseorang bisa saja selamat akan tetapi bisa saja tenggelam di dalamnya. Al-SanhÅ«rÄ«, salah satu pemikir Islam terkenal, menawarkan gagasan untuk mengubah konsep KhilÄfah IslÄmÄ«yyah sebagai wahÌ£dah al-dawlah yang mengandaikan peleburan negara-negara menuju wahÌ£dah al-`ummah (kesatuan umat) dengan mewujudkan suatu lembaga multi-nasional yang akan memperjuangkan prinsip-prinsip Islam di belahan dunia manapun
KONTRIBUSI HASAN HANAFI DALAM KAJIAN USHUL FIQH
Full text linkHasan Hanafi is an expert on Islamic law who had the idea of reconstruction usul fiqh. Min Al-Nash ila Al-Waqi, written by him as the reconstruction effort, continuing the spirit of creativity, Al-Risala, Al-Mushtashfā and Al-Muwāfaqāt. Min Al-Nash ila Al-Waqi' written to undermine the claims of Islamic law to disappear the public good (al-mashāliħ al-' ammah). The entire reconstruction project of Hanafi had been referred as a result of application of the phenomenological method. Hanafi called tahlil manhaj al-khabarāt, comparable to manāhij al-ta'wil, manāhij al-nazhar, manāhij al-żauq, manāhij al-tahlil al-lughawī and other methods of classical Islamic creations. Through the philosophy of phenomenology, hermeneutics Gadamerian, Hanafi appreciate the application of the themes and traditions of thought, but in the context of Al-Quran and Al-Sunnah. Hanafi recommends usul fiqh as sacra hermeneutica, the specific case of general hermeneutics. Hanafi, divides methodological-epistemological consciousness of usul fiqh into three-dimensional consciousness; historical consciousness (la conscience historique), eidetic consciousness (la conscience eidetique), and the active awareness (la conscience active). Hanafi finds methodological shift that can be read from configuration changes chapter and logical structure of usul fiqh texts shift. This changes was seen in Al-Mustashfa, work of al-Ghazali (d. 505 H) and Al-Muwāfaqā,t work of Al-Syatibi (d. 790 H)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
