1,720,956 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SECARA BERSAMA DAN BERLANJUT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 97/PID.SUS-TPK/2019/PN JKT.PST)
No full textRecently, corruption has been increasingly discussed, both in print and electronic media, as well as in seminars, workshops, discussions, and so on. Corruption has become a serious problem for the Indonesian people, because corruption in Indonesia occurs systemically, massively and structured so that it is not only detrimental to the state's financial condition, but also violates the social and economic rights of the community at large. The research method used is a normative research method that focuses on library research to obtain secondary data from legal materials. The normative approach is carried out by reviewing the provisions or applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study indicate that the provisions regarding criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia are regulated in Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes and Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. In the consideration of the Panel of Judges, that in the public's view - the Defendant's actions were a disgraceful act, and during the examination process at the trial the Tribunal did not obtain justifying facts which could erase the unlawful nature of the Defendant's actions, nor the facts of forgiving reasons which could erase the guilt of the Defendant. Therefore, the defendant must be held accountable for his actions
DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SECARA BERSAMA DAN BERLANJUT
No full textAkhir-akhir ini korupsi semakin ramai diperbincangkan, baik di media cetak maupun elektronik, maupun dalam seminar, workshop, diskusi, dan lain sebagainya. Korupsi telah menjadi masalah serius bagi bangsa Indonesia, karena korupsi di Indonesia terjadi secara sistemik, masif dan terstruktur sehingga tidak hanya merugikan kondisi keuangan negara, tetapi juga melanggar hak-hak sosial dan ekonomi masyarakat secara luas. Permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana pertanggungjawaban hukum bagi pelaku korupsi? Dan apa dasar pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat nomor 97/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Jkt.Pst?. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang menitikberatkan pada penelitian kepustakaan untuk mendapatkan data sekunder dari bahan hukum. Pendekatan normatif dilakukan dengan meninjau ketentuan atau peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan mengenai tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia diatur dalam UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Dalam pertimbangan Majelis Hakim, bahwa menurut pandangan masyarakat - perbuatan Terdakwa merupakan perbuatan tercela, dan selama proses pemeriksaan di persidangan Majelis tidak memperoleh fakta-fakta yang membenarkan yang dapat menghapus perbuatan melawan hukum Terdakwa, maupun fakta-fakta alasan pemaaf yang dapat menghapus kesalahan Tergugat. Oleh karena itu, terdakwa harus mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya
DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SECARA BERSAMA DAN BERLANJUT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 97/PID.SUS-TPK/2019/PN JKT.PST)
No full textRecently, corruption has been increasingly discussed, both in print and electronic media, as well as in seminars, workshops, discussions, and so on. Corruption has become a serious problem for the Indonesian people, because corruption in Indonesia occurs systemically, massively and structured so that it is not only detrimental to the state\u27s financial condition, but also violates the social and economic rights of the community at large. The research method used is a normative research method that focuses on library research to obtain secondary data from legal materials. The normative approach is carried out by reviewing the provisions or applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study indicate that the provisions regarding criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia are regulated in Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes and Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. In the consideration of the Panel of Judges, that in the public\u27s view - the Defendant\u27s actions were a disgraceful act, and during the examination process at the trial the Tribunal did not obtain justifying facts which could erase the unlawful nature of the Defendant\u27s actions, nor the facts of forgiving reasons which could erase the guilt of the Defendant. Therefore, the defendant must be held accountable for his actions
DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SECARA BERSAMA DAN BERLANJUT
No full textAkhir-akhir ini korupsi semakin ramai diperbincangkan, baik di media cetak maupun elektronik, maupun dalam seminar, workshop, diskusi, dan lain sebagainya. Korupsi telah menjadi masalah serius bagi bangsa Indonesia, karena korupsi di Indonesia terjadi secara sistemik, masif dan terstruktur sehingga tidak hanya merugikan kondisi keuangan negara, tetapi juga melanggar hak-hak sosial dan ekonomi masyarakat secara luas. Permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana pertanggungjawaban hukum bagi pelaku korupsi? Dan apa dasar pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat nomor 97/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Jkt.Pst?. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang menitikberatkan pada penelitian kepustakaan untuk mendapatkan data sekunder dari bahan hukum. Pendekatan normatif dilakukan dengan meninjau ketentuan atau peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan mengenai tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia diatur dalam UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Dalam pertimbangan Majelis Hakim, bahwa menurut pandangan masyarakat - perbuatan Terdakwa merupakan perbuatan tercela, dan selama proses pemeriksaan di persidangan Majelis tidak memperoleh fakta-fakta yang membenarkan yang dapat menghapus perbuatan melawan hukum Terdakwa, maupun fakta-fakta alasan pemaaf yang dapat menghapus kesalahan Tergugat. Oleh karena itu, terdakwa harus mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya
- …
