1,722,477 research outputs found
FIGURE 5 in Taxonomic and morphological revision of butterfly rays of the Gymnura micrura (Bloch & Schneider 1801) species complex, with the description of two new species (Myliobatiformes: Gymnuridae)
No full textFIGURE 5. Varying degrees of development of the dorsal fin in Gymnura micrura (A– H: from smallest to largest dorsal fin); I) Radiograph of base of tail region showing the internal skeletal support of the dorsal fin. Arrows indicate the dorsal fin.Published as part of Carvalho, Marcelo Rodrigues De, 2017, Taxonomic and morphological revision of butterfly rays of the Gymnura micrura (Bloch & Schneider 1801) species complex, with the description of two new species (Myliobatiformes: Gymnuridae), pp. 1-74 in Zootaxa 4332 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4332.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/105204
FIGURE 43. Scapulocoracoid, lateral view. A in Taxonomic and morphological revision of butterfly rays of the Gymnura micrura (Bloch & Schneider 1801) species complex, with the description of two new species (Myliobatiformes: Gymnuridae)
No full textFIGURE 43. Scapulocoracoid, lateral view. A) Gymnura micrura; B) Gymnura lessae, sp. nov. C) Gymnura sereti, sp. nov. (BMNH 1930.3.24.4, 236 mm DW, CT-Scan image); D) Gymnura sereti, sp. nov. (BMNH 1963.8.9.3, 337 mm DW, CT- Scan image). Abbreviations: adf, anterodorsal fenestra; avf, anteroventral fenestra; fo, foramina; msc, mesocondyle; mtc, metacondyle; pc, procondyle; pdf, postdorsal fenestra; pvf, postventral fenestra.Published as part of Carvalho, Marcelo Rodrigues De, 2017, Taxonomic and morphological revision of butterfly rays of the Gymnura micrura (Bloch & Schneider 1801) species complex, with the description of two new species (Myliobatiformes: Gymnuridae), pp. 1-74 in Zootaxa 4332 (1) on page 59, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4332.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/105204
FIGURE 2 in A long-hidden pigmy shows itself again after almost a century: the rediscovery and lectotypification of Pygmaeorchis brasiliensis (Laeliinae, Orchidaceae)
No full textFIGURE 2. Illustration of Pygmaeorchis brasiliensis. A. General view of the plant. B. Detail of the flower. By S. G. Furtado based on Miranda & Hatakeyama 263.Published as part of Miranda, Marcelo Rodrigues, Furtado, Samyra Gomes & Neto, Luiz Menini, 2021, A long-hidden pigmy shows itself again after almost a century: the rediscovery and lectotypification of Pygmaeorchis brasiliensis (Laeliinae, Orchidaceae), pp. 297-300 in Phytotaxa 496 (3) on page 298, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.496.3.9, http://zenodo.org/record/542374
Temas relevantes sobre o direito das famílias
Get PDF- Divulgação dos SUMÁRIOS das obras recentemente incorporadas ao acervo da Biblioteca Ministro Oscar Saraiva do STJ. Em respeito à Lei de Direitos Autorais, não disponibilizamos a obra na íntegra.- Localização na estante: 347.6(81) T278r- Organizado por: César Fiuza.- Coordenado por: Edwirges Elaine Rodrigues, Marcelo Rodrigues da Silva e Roberto Alves de Oliveira Filho
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
