1,721,077 research outputs found
Avaliação da toxicidade causada pela exposição a IONPS utilizando zebrafish como organismo modelo
Full text linkHuman amyloidogenic light chain proteins result in cardiac dysfunction, cell death, and early mortality in zebrafish
No full textCharacterization and natural history of patients with LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy in the phase 3 REALM-DCM trial
Full text linkAIMS: LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a rare disease with an incompletely defined phenotype. The phase 3 REALM-DCM trial evaluated a potential disease-modifying therapy for LMNA-related DCM but was terminated due to futility without safety concern. This study utilized pooled data from REALM-DCM to descriptively characterize the phenotype and progression of LMNA-related DCM in a contemporary cohort of patients using common heart failure (HF) measures. METHODS: REALM-DCM enrolled patients with stable LMNA-related DCM, an implanted cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II/III HF symptoms. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2022, 77 patients took part in REALM-DCM. The median patient age was 53 years (range: 23-72), and 57% were male. Overall, 88% of patients had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic LMNA variant, and 12% had a variant of uncertain significance with a concordant phenotype. Among patients with confirmed sequencing, 55% had a missense variant. Atrial fibrillation was present in 60% of patients; 79% of all patients had NYHA Class II and 21% had NYHA Class III HF symptoms at baseline. Median (range) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration at baseline were 42% (23-62), 403 m (173-481), 67 (18-97) and 866 pg/mL (57-5248), respectively. LVEF, 6MWT distance and KCCQ-OS score were numerically lower in patients who had NYHA Class III versus II symptoms at baseline (LVEF: 38% vs. 43%; 6MWT distance: 326 vs. 413 m; and KCCQ-OS score: 43 vs. 70), whereas NT-proBNP concentration was higher (1216 vs. 799 pg/mL). Median follow-up was 73 weeks (range: 0.4-218; 73 in NYHA Class II and 75 in NYHA Class III). Patients displayed variable change from baseline in 6MWT, KCCQ-OS and NT-proBNP values during follow-up. Overall, 25% of patients experienced ventricular tachycardia, and 8% had ventricular fibrillation. Ten (13%) patients met the composite endpoint of worsening HF (adjudicated HF-related hospitalization or urgent care visit) or all-cause death; six had NYHA Class II and four had NYHA Class III at baseline. All-cause mortality occurred in 6 (8%) patients; three had NYHA Class II and three had NYHA Class III symptoms at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirm the significant morbidity and mortality associated with LMNA-related DCM despite the standard of care management. Typical measures of HF, including 6MWT distance, KCCQ-OS score and NT-proBNP concentration, were variable but correlated with NYHA class. An unmet treatment need remains among patients with LMNA-related DCM. NCT03439514
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
