1,721,287 research outputs found

    The current European debate on fiscal policy: Too much and too little

    Full text link
    In the last two weeks the European Central Bank (ECB) decided to launch new LTRO and T-LTRO programs to ensure liquidity to the banking sector as well as to small- and medium-sized firms (March 12, 2020) and to temporarily strengthen its ‘quantitative easing’ policy (March 18, 2020), which is centered on the purchases of government bonds and of a large set of private financial assets (including commercial papers). Moreover, the Single Supervisory Mechanism improved the positive impact of the ECB’s initiatives by temporarily weakening the capital requirements and the assessment of the non-performing exposures of the European banking sector. Finally, the European Commission (EC) decided to suspend the European coordination mechanism of the national fiscal policies, that is, the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). This last step was considered crucial, since it is commonly agreed that even a generous unconventional monetary policy cannot face the short- and medium-term economic impact of the current pandemic shock. The T-LTRO and the ‘quantitative easing’ may, at most, provide liquidity to different economic activities and flatten the structure of interest rates; they cannot absorb the ‘real’ shock on the supply side and transfer income to temporarily unemployed workers and to households. The latter are duties that pertain to fiscal policy

    A Schumpeterian Analysis of the Credit Market

    No full text
    Schumpeter shows that bank credit acts as money-­‐capital and, therefore, constitutes the necessary premise for the realization of the innovative processes planned by entrepreneurs. This makes it important to specify the debt contracts between each bank and entrepreneurs during the prosperity phase of Schumpeter’s cyclical development. The present paper aims to point out the achievements and the limits of Schumpeter’s monetary theory with respect to this point, that is the debt contract design. On the side of the limits, I maintain that Schumpeter’s approach, although representing one of the most stimulating contributions in the history of economic analysis, ask for refinements as regard to the objective-­‐function of the individual banks, the determination of the interest rates, and the usableness of the credit demand and supply curves. Schumpeter’s posthumous treatise on money provides stimulating insights for the definition of these refinements.Schumpeter shows that bank credit acts as money-­‐capital and, therefore, constitutes the necessary premise for the realization of the innovative processes planned by entrepreneurs. This makes it important to specify the debt contracts between each bank and entrepreneurs during the prosperity phase of Schumpeter’s cyclical development. The present paper aims to point out the achievements and the limits of Schumpeter’s monetary theory with respect to this point, that is the debt contract design. On the side of the limits, I maintain that Schumpeter’s approach, although representing one of the most stimulating contributions in the history of economic analysis, ask for refinements as regard to the objective-­‐function of the individual banks, the determination of the interest rates, and the usableness of the credit demand and supply curves. Schumpeter’s posthumous treatise on money provides stimulating insights for the definition of these refinements.Refereed Working Papers / of international relevanc
    corecore